Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies

MERDEKA BELAJAR DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INDONESIA Dwi Nur Fauziah Ahmad; Ahmad Arif fadilah; Dwi Citra Ningtyas; Sarah Nurmila Putri
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v2i1.4452

Abstract

Pendidikan merupakan alat untuk mencapai kebahagiaan dan kesejahteraan bagi seluruh umat manusia, pendidikan yang berkualitas akan mencerminkan masyarakat yang maju damai dan mengarah pada sifat-sifat yang konstruktif. Pendidikan juga menjadi roda penggerak sehingga kebudayaan dan kebiasaan dari tiap-tiap zaman menjadi berubah mengikuti perubahan yang di peroleh dari pendidikan itu sendiri. Maka ketika ingin mencapai kehidupan yang lebih baik tentunya pendidikanlah yang merupakan jawabannya, karena dari pendidikan melaihirkan hal-hal yang kreatif, inovatif dalam menapaki setiap perkembangan zaman.Merdeka belajar adalah program kebijakan baru Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia (Kemendikbud RI). Mendikbud telah menerbitkan Surat Edaran (SE) Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar dalam penentuan Kelulusan Peserta Didik dan Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021 yang ditujukan kepada Gubernur dan Bupati/Walikota Seluruh Indonesia. Merdeka Belajar merupakan konsep baru dalam Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Konsepnya ialah siswa maupun mahasiswa diberikan kebebasan dalam memilih aktivitas pembelajarannya.  Dibutuhkan kesiapan guru dan dosen dalam upaya merespon kebijakan tersebut
PUBLIC SPACE PARTICIPATION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST SERIOUS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN DISCOURSE PERSPECTIVE JÜRGEN HABERMAS Abdul Kadir; Fachri Aldifara Kurnia; Dwi Nur Fauziah Ahmad; Auliya Khasanofa; Ulil Albab
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol 3, No 1 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v3i1.6455

Abstract

This writing aims to analyze the background of the public sphere's participation in resolving cases of gross human rights violations by using the public sphere discourse of Jurgen Habermas. The method used in writing is a normative juridical approach. The point is that this research focuses more on literature studies and news studies, documentary studies on the provisions of laws and regulations. The results of this paper show that the factors that cause serious human rights cases cannot be legally resolved because of the very dominant political element in the settlement, such as this serious human rights case will be used as an advantage for practical political interests five years, and also the average perpetrators of gross human rights violations are currently an important element in the current Indonesian government. In this case, the element of public space should play an important role in resolving these gross human rights violations, in the theory of public space discus according to Jurgen Habermas, so that social problems such as legal problems can be resolved intersubjectively between the system and the public sphere, and the results obtained through consensus can be accepted. Intersubjectively without putting aside each opinion, Habermas proposes his concept of communicative discourse as a discourse that must be tested first in a communicative ratio. In the settlement of serious human rights cases, it is still possible to be resolved legally by involving the public sphere, because according to Habermas every social problem such as law can be resolved through communicative action. KEYWORDS: Communicative Ratio, Law, Serious Human Rights Cases, Public Space
The Support System Synergy on Working Productivity From The Perspective of Economic Sharia Law Farida Nurun Nazah; Saiful Bahri; Dwi Nur Fauziah Ahmad
Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies Vol 3, No 2 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/ijlp.v3i2.7495

Abstract

This study discusses the synergy of support systems on work productivity from the perspective of Islamic economic law. Support system or work productivity support system, is not only interpreted by the quality of human resources, but the whole system that supports each other for the implementation of effective and efficient performance. The research method uses qualitative research that focuses on literature study, including collecting bibliographical sources and processing data or citing references. Support systems that support work productivity include: the quality of human resources, efforts to provide motivation, technological excellence, availability of funds, completeness of facilities, and also infrastructure. Indicators of work productivity will be achieved in the ability to form good work professionalism, increase the results achieved from targets, high morale, self-development in increasing maximum performance, as well as quality as an output of performance results and work efficiency. Work productivity in accordance with Islamic economic law standards is one that reflects Islamic principles and ethics, including: good and useful, diligent at work and able to respect time, doing the best or better, working hard and optimally, competing and helping honest, consistent, has a high sense of belonging to work, responsibility, and is able to grow stronger and more solid human relations.