Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Indonesian Journal of Global Health research

A Time-Motion Study in Intensive Care Unit Using Direct Care Nursing Tool Arum Pratiwi; MH Dwi Nur Arif; Wisardoyo Wisardoyo; Abi Muhlisin; Dian Hudiyawati
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (194.522 KB) | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v4i2.1160

Abstract

In Nursing, direct care assessment is one of the significant components of nurse performance appraisal and workload identification. The study's purpose is to compare time-motion and the need for direct nursing action between junior and senior nurses in the intensive care unit. This study was conducted for three months in an intensive care unit for 30 nurses. Six investigators observed each nursing direct care action applied by the 34 nurses. Data were collected using the daily log form, then analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistic was independent t test. 35 types of natural care nursing were observed from 30 nurses listed in a nursing daily log. The longest mean time is personal hygiene, with an average time of 14.33 minutes. The shortest average time is respiratory therapy using a nebulizer with a mean of 1.43 minutes. The minimum nursing hours per patient day is 365 minutes (6.08 hours), and the maximum time is 542 minutes (9.03 hours) per day. Direct care means the score is 495 minutes (7.82 hours per day). This study found no significant differences in spending times between senior and junior nurses with t = 0.038, p = 0.970. This study found that the direct nursing action in the intensive care unit is related to nurse workload; this requires the same time for each type of nursing action.
A Time-Motion Study in Intensive Care Unit Using Direct Care Nursing Tool Arum Pratiwi; MH Dwi Nur Arif; Wisardoyo Wisardoyo; Abi Muhlisin; Dian Hudiyawati
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (194.522 KB) | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v4i2.1160

Abstract

In Nursing, direct care assessment is one of the significant components of nurse performance appraisal and workload identification. The study's purpose is to compare time-motion and the need for direct nursing action between junior and senior nurses in the intensive care unit. This study was conducted for three months in an intensive care unit for 30 nurses. Six investigators observed each nursing direct care action applied by the 34 nurses. Data were collected using the daily log form, then analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistic was independent t test. 35 types of natural care nursing were observed from 30 nurses listed in a nursing daily log. The longest mean time is personal hygiene, with an average time of 14.33 minutes. The shortest average time is respiratory therapy using a nebulizer with a mean of 1.43 minutes. The minimum nursing hours per patient day is 365 minutes (6.08 hours), and the maximum time is 542 minutes (9.03 hours) per day. Direct care means the score is 495 minutes (7.82 hours per day). This study found no significant differences in spending times between senior and junior nurses with t = 0.038, p = 0.970. This study found that the direct nursing action in the intensive care unit is related to nurse workload; this requires the same time for each type of nursing action.
Credential Method as A Measurement Tool for Nurses' Professionalism in A Hospital Sujiyanti Sujiyanti; Arum Pratiwi; Sugiharto Sugiharto
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v6i1.2913

Abstract

Credentials as an effort to maintain nurse competency and become the basis for granting clinical authority to nurses have not been implemented well. Implementation of processes for achieving goals varies across institutions. This research aims to identify the relationship between credentialing methods and the outcomes of the Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) by investigating differences in OPPE scores based on years of experience. This is a quantitative research study with a descriptive correlational and comparative approach, involving 66 respondents who meet the criteria: Nurse PK I; less than 5 years of experience. Data analysis was conducted using Rank Spearman correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The credentialing test method used a portfolio, interview, written test, and practical examination. The research results indicate that 48.48% of credentialing is done using these four methods. The majority of OPPE scores are rated as Good, accounting for 66.67%. The longer a nurse works, the better their performance rating. The Spearman rank test obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.353 with p= 0.004 (p<0.05), and the Kruskal-Wallis test obtained a Kruskal-Wallis value of 41.289 with p=0.000 (p<0.05). Conclusion: There is a relationship between credentialing methods and OPPE scores. The more credentialing methods used, the better the OPPE scores.