Supiah Supiah
IAIN Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Attitude of Non- English Major Student in Learning English Supiah Supiah
Tarbawy : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol 5 No 1 (2018): Tarbawy : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Publisher : IAIN Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/tarbawy.v5i1.830

Abstract

This paper analyzed the results from a survey of 116 non English major students from four majors at State College for Islamic Studies, Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung. It focused on some causes that may have hindered English learning in the past for students participating in the survey, and the students’ perspectives about English learning in State College for Islamic Studies, Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung.In the study reported here, a ready-made questionnaire from Hsiu-Ju Lin dan A. Clyde Warden about The English Learning Questionnaire was exposed, Factors of English learning for this population were analyzed descriptively.Results showed that most of the students had not either fear or unpleasant feelings about their past English learning experiences, and those students of different majors had different perspectives about English learning. Several suggestions are provided for future application in teaching English to non-English majors at State College for Islamic Studies, Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung..
Students’ Error in Transforming Active Voices into Passive Voices in Simple Past Tense Ratna Sari; Ihda Husnayaini; Supiah Supiah; Dody Sugiarto
EEdJ: English Education Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2022): Vol. 2, No. 1 (April 2022)
Publisher : English Education Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/eedj.v2i1.2520

Abstract

This study was carried out to analyze errors made by eleventh grade students in transforming active voices into passive voices. Specifically, it was carried out to identify common errors and obtaining the causes of errors made by the students in transforming active voices into passive voices. The research used descriptive qualitative method. The data were collected through tests and interviews with an English teacher and a number of students. The data test was identified, classified, and analyzed by using Dulay’s surface strategy taxonomy and the causes of errors were analyzed by using Petter Hubbard’s theory. The research revealed two major findings, (1) the most common errors made by students was misformation, which was most frequently produced by the students with a total error of 247 or 52%. It is followed by an error in omission with a total error of 115or 24%. Misordering with 98 errors or 20%, and the lowest is addition with 19 errors or 4%, (2) Based on Petter Hubbard’s theory, mother-tongue interferences, overgeneralization, and error was encouraged by the learning materials and methods used causing those errors.
Using Group Investigation (GI) Strategy to Improve Students’ Writing Skill Renada Puji Ayu; Supiah Supiah; Zulfikri B Rasuan; Atik Rahmaniyar
EEdJ: English Education Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2022): Vol. 2, No. 1 (April 2022)
Publisher : English Education Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/eedj.v2i1.2523

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out the effectiveness of Group Investigation Strategy in improving students’ writing skill This study is experimental and was conducted in Bangka, Bangka Belitung province. 50 students from two classes of middle school were taken as the sample. By using Paired Sample t-test and Independent Sample t-test, the result showed that the students who were taught by using Group Investigation Strategy got higher score than those who were not. The result of independent sample t-test stated that t-obtained (0.420) was lower than critical value of t- table (2.01) and the significant (2-tailed) was 0.670, higher than computation with significant level 0.005. In other words, there was a no significant difference between students who were taught by using Group Investigation Strategy and the students who were taught without using Group Investigation Strategy.