Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Notifikasi Akuisisi Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Florianus Yudhi Priyo Amboro; Hermanto Hermanto
Journal of Judicial Review Vol 20 No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The main goal of the notification of acquisition is as prevention effort of unfair business competition practice. This research was conducted to analyze implementation of notification on acquisition as an effort to prevention, analyzes role of Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha to assess and analyzes notification assessment standards was done with notification on acquisition. Case approach that used for this research is acquisition Axis by XL Axiata and acquisition Lafarge by Holcim. Research methodology used is juridical normative. Research normative juridical use of law primary, secondary and tertiary and using data primary. To obtain the data used method of literature study and interview. But the approach used in this research is the approach cases and statute approach. Based on the results of research that has been done so in reality the implementation of the notification is an effort to prevent monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. But the implementation of the acquisition notification is not currently reflecting the efforts to prevent, this can be seen from opinion of Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha related acquisition Axis by XL and acquisitions Lafarge by Holcim. A technical an appraisal that stipulated in the Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 3 Tahun 2012 has not given the head of house of the efforts to prevent.
Hak Waris Anak Adopsi Ditinjau dari Kuhperdata dan Hukum Waris Adat Tionghoa di Kota Tanjungpinang Florianus Yudhi Priyo Amboro; Suriani Suriani
Journal of Judicial Review Vol 20 No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pluralism Inheritance Law in Indonesia is recognized with different legal systems which are based on Indonesian Civil Code, Islamic Law and Customary Law. The implementation of the adoption with a difference rules raises different legal consequences in the case of inheritance. Chinese society basically applies Indonesian Civil Code meanwhile have the rights over the choice of law to apply the Customary Law. The issue was discussed regarding the setting up and implementation of child adoption observed from Indonesian Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek) and Chinese Customary Law. The purpose of this research was conducted to find out the rules and implementation inheritance for child adoption and directs the society in the determination of the appropriate law in the implementation of the inheritance distribution. The method of research conducted by the author is normative legal research by conducting data collection techniques by means of the study of librarianship and interviews. Furthermore, data analysis is done by descriptive qualitative way to solve those problems in research. The results of the research are the child adoption has the rights to inherit adoptive parents’ heritage with the same portion along with the other heirs based on Burgerlijk Wetboek. Inheritance of Chinese Customary Law applies the principle of semi-parental with child adoption get a part smaller than the other heirs except there is another provisions attached to each family depending on the decision of the deceased by observing the condition or the child adoption’s behavior in the family.
Implementasi Restrukturisasi Dalam Prosesi Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Di Indonesia Yudi Kornelis; Florianus Yudhi Priyo Amboro
Jurnal Selat Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Selat
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (933.033 KB) | DOI: 10.31629/selat.v7i2.1739

Abstract

Dalam rangka untuk melakukan penegakan hukum di bidang kepailitan, terdapat prosedur yang harus dilakukan oleh setiap pencari keadilan, yaitu prosedur kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang. Prosedur kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dimulai dengan permohonan, kemudian dilanjutkan dengan putusan pernyataan pailit maupun Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dan keseluruhan upaya hukumnya. Proses tersebut di dalamnya akan ditemukan restrukturisasi antara debitor untuk menghindari kepailitan, baik berupa restrukturisasi hutang maupun restrukturisasi perusahaan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendapatkan deskripsi restrukturisasi dalam praktik tentang prosedur kepailitan dan penangguhan pembayaran, dan juga menjadi panduan untuk mengoptimalkan rencana restrukturisasi yang diatur oleh debitor. Penelitian ini telah mencapai hasil bahwa restrukturisasi saat dalam proses kepailitan dan penangguhan pembayaran sebagian besar adalah restrukturisasi hutang dan dimulai dengan rencana penyelesaian. Rescheduling adalah model restrukturisasi kepailitan yang paling populer dan penangguhan pembayaran. Selain itu adalah kombinasi antara penjadwalan ulang dan penjualan aset, menemukan ekuitas baru, juga pertukaran utang ke ekuitas. Obsesi muncul dalam proses ketika debitor mengatur rencana restrukturisasi. Beberapa kasus menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman debitor terhadap penggunaan rencana restrukturisasi menjadi alasan utama kendala. Selain itu, pelaksanaan restrukturisasi mungkin gagal dalam beberapa kasus, dengan alasan kurangnya kemampuan dari debitur untuk menangani bisnis dan hutang.
A Analisis Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Tindakan Penyalahgunaan Data Pribadi oleh Penyelenggara Pinjaman Online Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Indonesia Novrianti Novri; Florianus Yudhi Priyo Amboro; Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2488

Abstract

The emergence of regulations regarding personal data in 2022 is eagerly awaited and anticipated by consumers who feel aggrieved by online service managers, especially in the field of online-based loan financial services. The rules that specifically regulate the protection of personal data are Law no. 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, prior to the existence of special regulations regarding personal data, the ITE Law and other similar legal regulations were used as a reference for consumer protection. Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection was formed so that it does not overlap with other regulations that guarantee the protection of personal data in the community. In addition to these regulations, there are still several regulations governing this matter, namely Law Number 11 of 2016 on amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning ITE, provisions of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) Number 1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection and OJK Provisions Number 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning Online-Based Loan Services. The research method used to write this article is a normative research method which is defined as research that has basic material from data in similar journals, articles, theses, theses, and so on. Consumers who are harmed can act legally with two choices, namely arbitration and litigation channels, if arbitration has been carried out then there is no agreement between the two parties for peace then they can pursue litigation channels by reporting this matter to the local police or can file lawsuits against the law to local District Court.