Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Notaris yang Diangkat Sebagai Pejabat Negara Safira Aulia Nisa; Bayu Dwi Anggono; Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas
Jurnal Syntax Transformation Vol 2 No 10 (2021): Jurnal Syntax Transformation
Publisher : CV. Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jst.v2i10.436

Abstract

The role of a notary is needed by the community in daily life in order to create certainty, discipline, and legal protection. In carrying out his duties and occupations, a notary must follow or obey the rules stated in the UUJN. However, there are some shortcomings found in the UUJN, one of the shortcomings is the procedures that must be carried out by a notary who is appointed as a state official. The shortcoming intended is the presence of a different understanding between the rules for dismissal for notaries who hold concurrent positions as state officials, namely Article 3 letter g juncto with Article 8 section (1) letter e and Article 17 section (1) letter d juncto with Article 17 section (2) letter c with articles that require leave for notaries who are appointed as state officials, namely Article 11 section (1) and Article 25 section (3) and Article 32 section (1) of the UUJN. Different understandings between articles in UUJN lead to concurrent positions between notary positions and state officials. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to know the meaning of the words resign and leave according to UUJN for notaries who are appointed as state officials, besides that knowing about the provisions for notaries who are appointed as state officials whether they can regain their position as notary. And it is also necessary to reevaluate the articles in UUJN related to future regulations for notaries who are appointed as state officials. In this paper, the type of empirical juridical research is used, which is not only guided by the scientific method but also by examining the real condition in the field, especially in the provisions for notaries who are appointed as state officials. The results of the research in this paper, namely based on the meaning of the words stop and leave for a notary who is appointed as a state official according to UUJN does not make a difference, a notary who is on leave because he is appointed as a state official can return to being a notary when his term of office is over but if he does not take leave procedures and is considered to have concurrent positions, it is not necessarily possible to become a notary again even though the term of office as a state official has ended, in the future two concepts should be given, namely applying leave without a substitute notary or the dismissal of a notary from his position when he prefers to become a state official
KEWENANGAN NOTARIS MENGESAHKAN PERJANJIAN KAWIN SEBAGAI AMANAT KONSTITUSI Firman Floranta Adonara; Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 11, No 1 (2022): Mei 2022
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v11i1.1864

Abstract

The regulation in the Marriage Law Chapter 29 Verse (1) after Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU/XII/2015 has been change into the process of marriage agreement. In the marriage agreement that legalized into Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU/XII/2015 can only be made before the marriage takes place. However, when the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU/XII/2015 arrives, a marriage agreement can be made as long as the marriage has taken place. The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU/XII/2015 also gives a new authority to the Notary to be able to ratify the marriage agreement. Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU/XII/2015 has provided changes after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU/XII/2015 regarding the form of the marriage agreement in the form of a written agreement and must be ratified by the employee The marriage registrar has often been misinterpreted as an authentic deed, resulting in disharmony of implementing regulations related to the form of the marriage agreement.
ROLE OF LAND DEED OFFICIALS IN LEGAL SATISFACTION GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETE SYSTEMATIC LAND REGISTRATION Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas; Rico Zubaidi
NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (337.808 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jn.5.1.1786.49-57

Abstract

Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) as an accelerated land registration program in Indonesia led directly by the President needs to provide assurance and legal protection of ownership of land rights. PTSL in this case is assigned to the Adjudication Committee which functions as the executor of PTSL according to the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian/Head of the National Land Agency. PPAT as a public official mandated by Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration in fact could not be found its role in the implementation of PTSL both outside and within the Adjudication Committee. This study aims to examine the role of PPAT that exists and should be present in the implementation of PTSL. The research methodology used is normative legal research with literature study in primary and secondary data collection. The results of the study found no role for PPAT in PTSL legislation. If referring to Government Regulation No. 24/1997, all transitions after the birth of this regulation require a PPAT deed as written evidence of ownership or transfer of land rights. The Adjudication Committee as the executor of PTSL should coordinate with PPAT to ensure that PTSL meets the legal data research stage so that an orderly, complete registration of land is achieved and provides legal certainty of ownership of land rights.
Decision on Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debt which Ended in Bankruptcy at PT Sarana Yeoman Sembada Edi Wahjuni; Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas; Jelita Darma
Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation Vol. 2 No. 5 (2022)
Publisher : PT Mattawang Mediatama Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (293.17 KB) | DOI: 10.35877/454RI.daengku1035

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out about the simple evidentiary regulations in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU. In addition, to find out the formal evidence as well as the judge's legal considerations in the decision to postpone the payment of debt obligations that ended in bankruptcy at PT. Sarana Yeoman Sembada. This research uses normative legal research. The results of this study are that the simple evidence referred to in the determination of bankruptcy is also contained in the PKPU arrangement in Article 222 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU. In addition, the Bilyet Giro submitted in the PKPU application against PT. Sarana Yeoman Sembada is invalid as evidence because it does not meet the formal requirements of the Bilyet Giro and violates the provisions contained in the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU, so that the bankruptcy decision given by the Panel of Judges to PT. Sarana Yeoman Sembada was declared wrong because the application which was granted by the Panel of Judges came from an application submitted by the Petitioner who had no legal standing.
Akta Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Alam Hukum Kepailitan Iqbal Tamrin; Ermanto Fahamsyah; Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas
Journal of Economic and Business Law Review Vol 1 No 2 (2021): Journal of Economic & Business Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Hukum Perbankan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (738.084 KB)

Abstract

Pada prinsipnya, akta perdamaian yang dibuat secara sah akan mengikat dan mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang sama dengan putusan pengadilan yang telah mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap dan tidak dapat dilakukan upaya banding. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Tujuan penelitian untuk menemukan makna akta perdamaian dalam penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang dan menemukan apakah akta perdamaian PKPU dapat dijadikan sebagai alat bukti otentik. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah akta yang dibuat dalam proses beracara di pengadilan yang disepakati oleh para pihak dapat dimaknai sebagai akta perdamaian. Akta perdamaian PKPU yang telah dihomologasi memiliki kekuatan eksekutorial sebagaimana putusan hakim yang mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap
Legal Protection For Aku Papua Song Writer That Has Been Cover At The Opening Of PON 2021 Ferdiansyah Putra Manggala; Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas; Arnendya Lania
Simbur Cahaya Volume 30 Nomor 1, Juni 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v30i1.2818

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan memahami perlindungan hukum bagi pencipta lagu Aku Papua yang di cover ulang dan digunakan oleh penyanyi tanpa izin pencipta di PON. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penulisan yuridis normatif dimana setiap persoalan yang diangkat, dibahas dan diuraikan dalam penelitian ini menitikberatkan pada kaidah dan norma hukum positif. Sedangkan dalam pendekatan masalah yang digunakan, penulis menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk perlindungan hukum yang diberikan oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta adalah perlindungan hukum internal yang diatur dalam Pasal 80-82 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan perlindungan hukum eksternal yang diatur dalam Pasal 112,113, dan 116. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Munculnya masalah bisa menjadi perselisihan. Sengketa yang terjadi harus diselesaikan oleh para pihak. Penyelesaian sengketa dapat diselesaikan melalui litigasi dan non litigasi. Penyelesaian sengketa litigasi merupakan penyelesaian sengketa melalui pengadilan, sedangkan penyelesaian sengketa non litigasi merupakan penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan di luar pengadilan.