Faissal Malik
Dosen Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Kahirun

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte Dalam Tindak Pidana Pengeroyokan Pada Prespektif Asas Legalitas. M. Afdal Hi Anwar; Faissal Malik; Rusdin Alauddin
Khairun Law Journal Volume 3 Issue 2, March 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/ Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte, yang amar putusannya tidak mencantumkan perintah supaya terdakwa ditahan adalah putusan yang hanya didasarkan pada “kebiasaan hakim” dan dasar pertimbangan hakim tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan  hukum yang mengikat untuk dieksekusi oleh Jaksa selaku eksekotor sebagimana ketentuan Pasal 30 ayat (1) huruf b UU. No 16/2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Akibat hukum dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/ Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte, yang amar putusannya tidak mencantumkan perintah supaya terdakwa ditahan merupakan putusan yang lemah dan berakibat fatal secara hukum sehingga putusan tersebut dinyatakan batal demi hukum sebagaimana ketentuan hukum yang diatur dalam Pasal 197 Ayat (1)Huruf a-ldan ayat (2) KUHAP serta Putusan tersebut juga telah menyimpangi prinsip-prinsip pokok dalam asas legalitas. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah  teori asas legalitas, teori tentang putusan dan teori Pemidanaan, yaitu Teori Absolut/Retribusi,  Tujuan/Relatif dan teori Gabungan
Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Denda Sebagai Upaya Menekan Tingkat Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas di Kota Ternate M. Agus F Sudarsono; Faissal Malik; Anshar Anshar
Khairun Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 1, September 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The legal basis regulating traffic is Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2009 concerning "Road Traffic and Transportation" (hereinafter written UULAJ). Traffic procedures are regulated in Article 105 to Article 126 UULAJ. However, the current high number of traffic violations is one of the causes of the high number of traffic accidents that occur. With the increasing need for transportation for the community, there are also more vehicles in the traffic lane so that it cannot be denied that it will cause violations to be committed, especially by motorized vehicle drivers which results in quite difficult and complicated problems. Fines are a type of crime that is generally imposed on all violations. The fact is currently happening in Kota Ternate, although the ticket fines already exist, the number of traffic violations is always there and tends to increase. One of the causes is the low number of fines imposed by the District Court Judges of Ternate on traffic offenders so that traffic offenders feel that they are able to pay the sanctions given and the supervision of traffic officers is not proportional to the size of the area being supervised so that it causes unevenness and weakness. supervision of offendersSanctions; Criminal Fines; Traffic violations
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte Dalam Tindak Pidana Pengeroyokan Pada Prespektif Asas Legalitas. M. Afdal Hi Anwar; Faissal Malik; Rusdin Alauddin
Khairun Law Journal Volume 3 Issue 2, March 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (933.509 KB)

Abstract

Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/ Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte, yang amar putusannya tidak mencantumkan perintah supaya terdakwa ditahan adalah putusan yang hanya didasarkan pada “kebiasaan hakim” dan dasar pertimbangan hakim tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan  hukum yang mengikat untuk dieksekusi oleh Jaksa selaku eksekotor sebagimana ketentuan Pasal 30 ayat (1) huruf b UU. No 16/2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Akibat hukum dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor : 177/ Pid.B/2018/PN.Tte, yang amar putusannya tidak mencantumkan perintah supaya terdakwa ditahan merupakan putusan yang lemah dan berakibat fatal secara hukum sehingga putusan tersebut dinyatakan batal demi hukum sebagaimana ketentuan hukum yang diatur dalam Pasal 197 Ayat (1)Huruf a-ldan ayat (2) KUHAP serta Putusan tersebut juga telah menyimpangi prinsip-prinsip pokok dalam asas legalitas. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah  teori asas legalitas, teori tentang putusan dan teori Pemidanaan, yaitu Teori Absolut/Retribusi,  Tujuan/Relatif dan teori Gabungan
Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Denda Sebagai Upaya Menekan Tingkat Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas di Kota Ternate M. Agus F Sudarsono; Faissal Malik; Anshar Anshar
Khairun Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 1, September 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (966.28 KB)

Abstract

The legal basis regulating traffic is Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2009 concerning "Road Traffic and Transportation" (hereinafter written UULAJ). Traffic procedures are regulated in Article 105 to Article 126 UULAJ. However, the current high number of traffic violations is one of the causes of the high number of traffic accidents that occur. With the increasing need for transportation for the community, there are also more vehicles in the traffic lane so that it cannot be denied that it will cause violations to be committed, especially by motorized vehicle drivers which results in quite difficult and complicated problems. Fines are a type of crime that is generally imposed on all violations. The fact is currently happening in Kota Ternate, although the ticket fines already exist, the number of traffic violations is always there and tends to increase. One of the causes is the low number of fines imposed by the District Court Judges of Ternate on traffic offenders so that traffic offenders feel that they are able to pay the sanctions given and the supervision of traffic officers is not proportional to the size of the area being supervised so that it causes unevenness and weakness. supervision of offendersSanctions; Criminal Fines; Traffic violations