Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

West Papuan Teachers’ Perceptions on Translanguaging Practices in EFL Classroom Interaction Rahmawansyah Sahib; Najiba Nawing; Hamra Sari; Syamsir bin Ukka
ELT-Lectura Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020): ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching
Publisher : Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/elt-lectura.v7i2.4205

The belief that the West Papuan teachers applied translanguaging practice as strategy to enhance their students in ELT classroom. This study, investigated the West Papuan EFL teachers’ perceptions on translanguaging practices. It focused to explore the teachers’ knowledge and the teachers’ experience on translanguaging practice in EFL Classroom interaction in West Papuan. The participants of the study were three English language teachers (EFL) who work at state Islamic junior high school of Manokwari in West Papuan. The utterances of teachers’ interview were analyzed descriptive qualitatively using discourse analysis and the data gathered from classroom observations and semi-structured interviews were exposed to structural-coding analysis. The results showed that the EFL teachers have some perceptions about knowledge on translanguaging practice. There were translanguaging is a combination of Indonesian and English in the ELT Classroom, Translanguaging is a material transfer tool, Translanguaging is a safe and productive zone for students to do communication, Translanguaging is the moment for using mother tongue and local language in explaining material, Translanguaging is a strategy to improve and facilitate the understanding of material, Translanguaging is a strategy to enliven the classroom atmosphere. The EFL teachers also have experiences to apply translanguaging practice in ELT classroom. They used translanguaging to appreciate students in process of asking and answer the questions, to facilitate the transfer of material toward students, to assist the students in apply the target language, to respect the students’ questions that use the local language, and translanguaging as a challenge for teachers to master the local language of students.

ANALISIS KOMPARASI STRATEGI BELAJAR INDIVIDU PESERTA DIDIK TINGKAT SLTP (Dilihat Dari Perspektif Gender) Riska Yulianti; Syamsir Bin Ukka
e- Jurnal Mitra Pendidikan Vol 4 No 5 (2020): Jurnal Mitra Pendidikan Edisi Mei
Publisher : Kresna Bina Insan Prima

Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang strategi belajar individu tingkat SLTP dengan tujuan dari penelitian untuk mengetahui perbedaan strategi belajar individu peserta didik antara SLTP Keagamaan dan Umum dilihat dari perspektif gender pria, strategi belajar individu peserta didik antara SLTP Keagamaan dan umum dilihat dari perspektif gender wanita. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif komparasi dengan populasi seluruh peserta didik SLTP di wilayah kabupaten Jayapura. Sampel diambil dengan teknik purposive sampling berjumlah 230 orang yang berasal dari 2 sekolah yakni SLTP Keagamaan (MTs Negeri Jayapura) dan SLTP Umum (SMP Negeri 3 Nimboran). Data strategi belajar individu dikumpulkan dengan kuisioner yang kemudian dianalisis menggunakan uji beda untuk melihat perbedaan strategi belajar individu keduanya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan strategi belajar individu peserta didik antara SLTP Keagamaan dan Umum dilihat dari perspektif gender pria dan terdapat perbedaan strategi belajar individu peserta didik antara SLTP Keagamaan dan Umum dilihat dari perspektif gender wanita.

STUDENTS’ STRATEGIES IN ACADEMIC WRITING: A STUDY ON LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY HIGH-ACHIEVEMENT STUDENTS AT STKIP MUHAMMADIYAH BONE Syamsir Bin Ukka; Baso Jabu; Sukardi Weda
Transformasi : Jurnal Kepemimpinan & Pendidikan Islam Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Transformasi : Jurnal Kepemimpinan & Pendidikan islam
Publisher : Pascasarjana IAIN Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47945/transformasi.v2i2.320

This research aimed to find out the strategies used by the high-achievement students in academic writing and to find out the lecturers’ perception about the strategies applied by the students at STKIP Muhammadiyah Bone. This research is a descriptive qualitative research that applied two research questions. The data was collected from the subjects that consist of six students and one lecturer. The research subjects were chosen by purposive sampling technique. The researchers were the main instruments of the research and applied interview and taking research notes by using observation sheets. This research used interview and observation to collect the data. The writing class activities were observed and the respondents were interviewed. The results were analyzed descriptively. Based on the data analysis, it was found that students used different learning strategies in academic writing. Students A and C used cooperative learning strategy because they enjoyable in small group discussions before make decision while Students B and E used mapping strategy who like follow the structured writing stage of writing. Student D used spider web strategy that refers to arrange the ideas more structured and Student F used collaborative learning strategy that student who like giving and asking help. The lecturer’s perception indicated that students who learnt writing skill use different strategies based on their understanding level. The findings and conclusions noted that the learning strategies applied by the students in this research based on their achievement level and learning style. By these strategies, the students are capable to increase their writing skill by using the appropriate strategy.

SURFACE STRATEGY TAXONOMY: GRAMMATICAL ERRORS ANALYSIS IN THE THIRD-SEMESTER STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE ESSAY Annafi’in Nur Rixha; Idrus Alhamid; Siti Rokhmah; Syamsir Bin Ukka
KARIWARI SMART : Journal of Education Based on Local Wisdom Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): July 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Fattahul Muluk Papua

English and Indonesian are grammatically different. The difference proves that the rules and the application of grammar are the difficult problems in writing English. Based on previous preliminary research, many Third-Semester students of English Education Study Program had problems using grammar. This is supported by the results of unstructured interviews by researcher against students. Then students made mistakes they cannot correct called errors. As English Education students, they must have good competence in all language skills to become a good English teacher. In the future, students will teach writing effectively if they master the grammatical understanding.This research’s objectives were to find: (1) The the types of grammatical errors based on surface strategy taxonomy found in students’ descriptive essay,(2) The dominant grammatical error based on surface strategy taxonomy found in students’ descriptive essay,(3) The factors causing students made grammatical error in writing descriptive essays.To achieve the objectives, a qualitative method is used. Data collected by observation, interview and documentation from students’ descriptive essay worksheet then analyzed using error analysis.The findings of the research: (1) Grammatical errors are Misformation (3rd Person Singular, Plural, Auxiliary Verb, Dictionaries, Preposition, Conjunction, Pronoun, Singular, Simple Present Tense, Simple Past Tense), Omission (Simple Present Tense, Agreement, Auxiliary Verb, Plural, Article, Pronoun, Conjunction, Preposition, Adverb), Addition (Simple Additions, Double Marking), Misordering (Adjective, Pronoun, Auxiliary Verb). (2) The dominant grammatical error is Misformation with 47.05% from 170 errors. (3) The factors causing error are Interlingual and Intralingual.

ERROR ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC WRITING PAPERS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDENTS AT IAIN FATTAHUL MULUK PAPUA Syamsir Bin Ukka; Andi Miftahul Maulidil Mursyid; Erfin Wijayanti
JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program Vol 2 No 02 (2021): Volume 02 Nomor 02 Desember 2021
Publisher : LP2M Institut Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Sinjai

This research aims to identify the factors of writing errors and efforts to identify the resolution of errors in writing academic papers for English Education students at IAIN Fattahul Muluk Papua. The theory used to examine the research problem is standard and correct language, grammar theory, and error analysis as the leading theory. The research method is descriptive-qualitative. The results showed that the writing error factor was in morphological errors, lexicon errors, syntactic errors, and systematics of writing. First, morphological errors include punctuation errors, spelling errors, and vocabulary errors. Second, lexicon errors include grammatical errors and conciseness errors. Third, syntactic errors include unclear sentences, sentences that have ambiguous intentions and incomplete sentences. Fourth, systematic errors in writing include the thickness of letters, coherence, the distance between sub-chapters and incompleteness of sentences. Efforts to resolve writing errors, so that its do not happen again by realizing an English version of the academic paper writing module in simple language equipped with systematic explanations, formats, and substance of academic papers.

Exploring the Impact of Using Google Classroom on Speaking Virtual Class by Papuan EFL Students Rahmawansyah Sahib; Erfin Wijayanti; Anggit Prasetio Nugroho; Syamsir bin Ukka; Andi Miftahul Maulidil Mursyid
ELT-Lectura Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022): ELT-Lectura Studies and Perspective in English Language Teaching
Publisher : Universitas Lancang Kuning

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31849/elt-lectura.v9i2.9769

This study will delineate and complete prior research gaps in the context of Papuan EFL students developing speaking abilities using Google Classroom. The main objective of this study is to investigate the impact of utilizing Google Classroom to develop speaking skills digitally. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach, with data gathered through offline interviews and online observations of Tadris English students who developed speaking subjects. Then, interpretive thematic analysis is used to analyze the data throughout the process which consists of data collection, reduction, interpretation, presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that students experienced several impacts from the use of Google classroom in learning speaking skills. The impact of using Google classroom is to save time and money, train student discipline in managing study time, make students more independent and proactive in accessing learning resources, trigger vocabulary changes, make students more difficult to get corrective feedback, limit student interaction directly, make students feel insecure, confused, and anxious, affecting student learning outcomes, understanding of the material delivered is not maximum. As a consequence, instructors should think more on the numerous preparations and instructional tactics utilized in teaching virtual speaking abilities. Of course, further study on the usage of Google Classroom for language skills other than speaking is required to enhance the conclusions of existing research. So that the guide for utilizing the learning platform in English learning is more detailed.

ERROR ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC WRITING PAPERS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDENTS AT IAIN FATTAHUL MULUK PAPUA Syamsir Bin Ukka; Andi Miftahul Maulidil Mursyid; Erfin Wijayanti
JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program Vol 2 No 02 (2021): Volume 02 Nomor 02 Desember 2021
Publisher : LP2M Universitas Islam Ahmad Dahlan Sinjai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47435/jle.v2i2.729

This research aims to identify the factors of writing errors and efforts to identify the resolution of errors in writing academic papers for English Education students at IAIN Fattahul Muluk Papua. The theory used to examine the research problem is standard and correct language, grammar theory, and error analysis as the leading theory. The research method is descriptive-qualitative. The results showed that the writing error factor was in morphological errors, lexicon errors, syntactic errors, and systematics of writing. First, morphological errors include punctuation errors, spelling errors, and vocabulary errors. Second, lexicon errors include grammatical errors and conciseness errors. Third, syntactic errors include unclear sentences, sentences that have ambiguous intentions and incomplete sentences. Fourth, systematic errors in writing include the thickness of letters, coherence, the distance between sub-chapters and incompleteness of sentences. Efforts to resolve writing errors, so that its do not happen again by realizing an English version of the academic paper writing module in simple language equipped with systematic explanations, formats, and substance of academic papers.

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 7 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search