Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Constitutional Review Jurnal Konstitusi
Mardian Wibowo
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
The Criticism on the Meaning of “Open Legal Policy” in Verdicts of Judicial Review at the Constitutional Court Mardian Wibowo Wibowo, Mardian; Nurjaya, I Nyoman; Safaat, Muchammad Ali
Constitutional Review Vol 3, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.026 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/consrev326

Abstract

In several verdicts of judicial review, the Constitutional Court formulates a concept of Open Legal Policy. The concept begins from a condition when a norm of law submitted to judicial review by the 1945 Constitution does not have reference in the 1945 Constitution. In other words, the open legal policy is a condition when the Constitutional Court cannot find any reference for the norm submitted to the judicial review. By using a construction method, this present research tries to find the meaning of a concept of open legal policy arranged by the Constitutional Court, then assessing whether the concept is in line with the spirit of judicial review. If the formulation of the concept done by the Constitutional Court has not been ideal, the deconstruction will be conducted toward the meaning that already exists until the open legal policy ideal with the perspective of the constitution is found. In this research, the finding shows different meaning of open legal policy between various verdicts of the Constitutional Court. Moreover, a new meaning is proposed including improvement of criteria of the open legal policy based on the difference between the object of regulation (what) and the content of the regulation (how).
Problem Penemuan Kebenaran dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Wibowo, Mardian
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.985 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1317

Abstract

Every effort of discovering the truth always faced with the possibility to slip. This possibility of slips also occurs in the Constitutional Court Decisions, specifically one which strongly related to material truth, such as in the decision related in dispute  of local general election result. Based on that certainty, this paper  attempts  to study the problems that could arise whenever the Constitutional Court manage to discover the truth, while also tries to present alternatives in the attempt to repair the aforemention slips.
Menakar Konstitusionalitas sebuah Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Wibowo, Mardian
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (385.452 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1221

Abstract

This study attempts to elaborate the definition of the “open legal policy” concept which has stated by the Constitutional Court as the autonomy of the Law- making body whenever UUD 1945 as the constitution did not regulate particular substances of a Law that is being made. In order to prevent this autonomy leans toward arbitrariness, it is necessary to establish a model of review towards open legal policies. One feasable option that the Constitutional Court could adapt is the "maximin" strategy (selecting the best option in numbers of bad possibilities) which is developed from the rational choice approach.
Problem Penemuan Kebenaran dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Wibowo, Mardian
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (489.985 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1317

Abstract

Every effort of discovering the truth always faced with the possibility to slip. This possibility of slips also occurs in the Constitutional Court Decisions, specifically one which strongly related to material truth, such as in the decision related in dispute  of local general election result. Based on that certainty, this paper  attempts  to study the problems that could arise whenever the Constitutional Court manage to discover the truth, while also tries to present alternatives in the attempt to repair the aforemention slips.
Menakar Konstitusionalitas sebuah Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Wibowo, Mardian
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (385.452 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1221

Abstract

This study attempts to elaborate the definition of the “open legal policy” concept which has stated by the Constitutional Court as the autonomy of the Law- making body whenever UUD 1945 as the constitution did not regulate particular substances of a Law that is being made. In order to prevent this autonomy leans toward arbitrariness, it is necessary to establish a model of review towards open legal policies. One feasable option that the Constitutional Court could adapt is the "maximin" strategy (selecting the best option in numbers of bad possibilities) which is developed from the rational choice approach.
JUSTICES’ FREEDOM OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION METHOD IN THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Mardian Wibowo
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 25, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (384.593 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16085

Abstract

This paper lays out the method of interpretation used by the Indonesian Constitutional Court in inter-preting the articles within 1945 Indonesian Constitution, primarily in judicial reviews and disputes on the authority of state organ. Among the existing and mostly applied interpretation methods injurisprudence, the Court does not consider it self bound by a single method. The resort to variousinterpretation methods,  dependent on the nature of the case at hand, indicates that the Court is progressiveand tends to favour contextual approach. Nonetheless, since the Court is composed of nine differentindividuals, the interpretation approach will largely depend on each Justice’s legal thought. Tulisan ini mencoba menelusuri metode tafsir yang dipergunakan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menafsirkan ketentuan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, terutama dalamperkara pengujian undang-undang dan sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara. Dari beberapa metode tafsiryang ada dan lazim dipergunakan dalam bidang ilmu hukum, ternyata Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak mengikatdirinya pada satu metode tafsir saja. Penggunaan beberapa metode tafsir oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi secarabergantian, tergantung perkara yang dihadapi, menunjukkan sifat progresif dan pemahaman kontekstual.Namun karena Mahkamah Konstitusi adalah kumpulan dari sembilan individu hakim konstitusi makametode tafsir yang dipergunakan sangat tergantung pada kecenderungan dari masing-masing hakim.
The Criticism on the Meaning of “Open Legal Policy” in Verdicts of Judicial Review at the Constitutional Court Mardian Wibowo Mardian Wibowo; I Nyoman Nurjaya; Muchammad Ali Safaat
Constitutional Review Vol 3, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.026 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/consrev326

Abstract

In several verdicts of judicial review, the Constitutional Court formulates a concept of Open Legal Policy. The concept begins from a condition when a norm of law submitted to judicial review by the 1945 Constitution does not have reference in the 1945 Constitution. In other words, the open legal policy is a condition when the Constitutional Court cannot find any reference for the norm submitted to the judicial review. By using a construction method, this present research tries to find the meaning of a concept of open legal policy arranged by the Constitutional Court, then assessing whether the concept is in line with the spirit of judicial review. If the formulation of the concept done by the Constitutional Court has not been ideal, the deconstruction will be conducted toward the meaning that already exists until the open legal policy ideal with the perspective of the constitution is found. In this research, the finding shows different meaning of open legal policy between various verdicts of the Constitutional Court. Moreover, a new meaning is proposed including improvement of criteria of the open legal policy based on the difference between the object of regulation (what) and the content of the regulation (how).
PEMAKNAAN NORMA HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM UUD 1945 BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Aan Eko Widiarto; Muchamad Ali Safa'at; Mardian Wibowo
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6858.518 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01002.8

Abstract

AbstractThe authority of judicial review of  an Act by the Constitutional Court has a strategic position in strengthening the rule of law in Indonesia, which is one of the characteristics is the recognition and protection of human rights. The Constitutional Court in exercising judicial review authority has interpreted various provisions of the 1945 Constitution on human rights. Some of which reinforce the meaning as grammatically read in the 1945 Constitution, but there are also decisions that mean differently than the grammatical meaning. This research was conducted to know the meaning of the provisions in the 1945 Constitution which regulate human rights, and to know whether through the Constitutional Court decision even change the meaning of human rights. This research method is normative juridical research. The approach used includes theoretical approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis of legal materials used in this study concluded that the decisions of the Constitutional Court other than affirm the meaning of human rights as contained in the 1945 Constitution, the Constitutional Court through its decision also has shifted (expand) some of the meaning of human rights contained in the 1945 Constitution. AbstrakKewenangan pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi menempati posisi strategis dalam penguatan negara hukum di Indonesia, yang salah satu cirinya adalah adanya pengakuan dan perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia. MK dalam menjalankan kewenangan pengujian undang-undang telah menafsirkan berbagai ketentuan UUD 1945 mengenai hak asasi manusia, yang beberapa penafsiran tersebut menguatkan makna sebagaimana secara gramatikal terbaca dalam UUD 1945 namun terdapat pula putusan yang memaknai secara berbeda dibandingkan makna gramatikal UUD 1945. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui makna ketentuan dalam UUD 1945 yang mengatur mengenai hak asasi manusia, serta untuk mengetahui apakah melalui putusan MK terjadi pergeseran bahkan perubahan makna hak asasi manusia dimaksud. Metode penelitian ini berbentuk penelitian yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan meliputi pendekatan teoretis (theoretical approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Berdasarkan analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa putusan-putusan MK selain menegaskan makna hak asasi manusia sebagaimana terdapat dalam UUD 1945, MK melalui putusannya juga telah menggeser (memperluas) sebagian makna hak asasi manusia yang tercantum di dalam UUD 1945.
Co-Authors Aan Eko Widiarto I NYOMAN NURJAYA I Nyoman Nurjaya Muchamad Ali Safaat Muchammad Ali Safaat