Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Astonjadro

COMPRESSIVE CAPACITY OF HELICAL PILE FOUNDATION ON PEAT WITH VARIATION OF HELICAL PLATE DIAMETER Sapria Adi; Ferry Fatnanta; Syawal Satibi
ASTONJADRO Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): ASTONJADRO
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/astonjadro.v11i1.5708

Abstract

The use of helical foundations to support structures on peat soil is still a new method. Research is needed to develop this foundation. There are 6 types of helical foundation tested on peat soil. To study the effect of helical plate diameter, plate diameters were varied with sizes 25 cm (M), 35 cm (L), and 45 cm (G). Plate positions (1, 2, 3 plates) are designed at 300 mm spacing. The axial compression bearing capacity test is carried out based on the constant rate of penetration procedure. At the beginning of loading, the load increases significantly. At a certain descent, the load begins to decrease slowly. The load-settlement curve shows that the larger the plate diameter, the greater the load it can withstand. The largest bearing capacity is produced by the GGG 30 foundation (3 plates dia.45 cm), which is 10.83 kN. LLL 30 helical foundation (3 plates dia.30 cm) provides a bearing capacity of 7.14 kN. These results clearly explain that the increase in plate diameter is directly proportional to the increase in the axial compression bearing capacity.
Analysis of the capability of pile assembly foundations in soft soil in physical modeling of variationsiin laboratory scale distances Arief Rahman; Ferry Fatnanta; Syawal Satibi
ASTONJADRO Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): ASTONJADRO
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/astonjadro.v12i1.8139

Abstract

The capacity of raft foundations, pile foundations and pile rafts on soft soil with variations in the distance between the piles. Perform analysis of the carrying capacity and settlement of each foundation test and then compare the results of the theoretical carrying capacity research with the analysis of carrying capacity calculations. The implementation of the test prepares the test along with samples of the raft foundation, pile foundation and pile raft foundation. The test were carried out using a gradual load then a dial gauge is placed at both ends of the sample raft and the load reading is taken. The pile foundation was tested with a decrease of 10 cm while the settlement on the raft foundation and the pile raft foundation was 3 cm, the carrying capacity of the raft foundation was 24 kg, the pile foundation varied 4D distances; 6D and 8D, namely 7.5 kg and the foundation of the pile raft with variations in 4D distance; 6D and 8D are 26 ; 32 and 32 kg. In the interpretation method, the pile raft foundation with various distances increased from 4D to 6D but decreased in 8D. Pile raft foundations with various distances between pile have not a significant effect where raft foundations are more dominant in supporting resistance than pile foundations.