Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi
M. Mahrus Ali, M. Mahrus
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tafsir Konstitusional Pelanggaran Pemilukada yang Bersifat Sistematis, Terstruktur dan Masif Ali, M. Mahrus; Rachman, Irfan Nur; Wijayanti, Winda; Putranto, Rio Tri Juli; Anindyajati, Titis; Asih, Putria Gusti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (350.749 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

The Constitutional Court has created a legal breakthrough in handling the local head election dispute, in order to uphold the democracy and break     away from habitual practice of systematic, structured, and massive (STM) violations. The Court does not simply calculate the results of vote count but also have to seek the justice and prosecute results counting rate that were disputed. As the juridical normative research, the research uses a statutory, case, historical approach and  the  sociology  of  law.  The  research  shows that throughout 2008-2011 Court has granted the dispute for as many as thirty-two cases. Of that amount  of  cases,  those  with  the  STM  violations are as many as 21 (twenty one) cases. Whereas the nature of TSM were   divided into two kinds namely cumulative and alternative which both may cancel local head election results. There are three types of local head election violations, first, violation  in  the  process  that  does  not  affect  the  results of the election. Second, the breach in the process that affect the election  results, thirdly, violation of the terms of conditions to be a candidate which  are principal in nature and can be measured. The systematic, structured and massive violation of the local head general election is violations committed by the structural apparatus, both government officials and election organizers, collectively; not an individual action, well-planned (by design) and the impact of such offencesis extensive rather than sporadic.
Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Studi Putusan Tahun 2003-2012) Asy’ari, Syukri; Hilipito, Meyrinda Rahmawaty; Ali, Mohammad Mahrus
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (668.003 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

Research concerning model and implementation of Constitutional Court Verdicts in Judicial Review of Law against the 1945 Constitution constitutes juridical normative research using secondary data which is primary legal material namely Constitutional Court verdicts issued from 2003 until 2012. This research aimed at identifying decisions of which the dictum say it granted the petition submitted at  the Court so that a comprehensive and integrative description of the model and implementation of Constitutional Court verdict can be found out. Article 56 Paragraph (3) and Article 57 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 24 Of 2003 as amended with Law No. 8 of 2011 on the Amendment of Law on Constitutional Court stipulate that in case a petition is granted, the Court will, at the same time, declares that a law is contradictory to the 1945 Constitution either wholly or partially and legally null and void since declard in an open court. This research found out that there are  other models of verdict with their own characteristics. Condititonally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional verdict is basically a model of decisions which  do not legally nullify and declare a norm null but these two models contain interpretation of a content of a paragraph, an article and/or part of a law or the whole part of a law which is basically declared contradictory or not contradictory to the Constitution and still have the   force of law or do not have the force of law. A limited constitutional model of verdict which postpone an enforcement of a decision which basically aims at providing some time for transition of the provision which has been declared  contradictory to the constitution to remain in force until   a certain time in the future. Another model of verdict is a decision which formulate  a new norm in order to cope with the unconstitutionality of implementation of a norm. This new norm is temporary in nature and will be included in the new law or revision of related law. The implementation of Constitutional Court decision can be inferred from the model of the decisions. A self-executing force can generally be applied to a legally null and void model of verdict and a model of verdict which formulates new norms. Conditionally constitutional, conditionally unconstitutional and limited constitutional model of verdict is non self-executing. This models must go through legislation process either with revision of laws or making of new laws and regulation process for the ordinances made under any acts.
Tenggang Waktu Konstitusionalitas dan Kebersesuaian Undang-Undang dengan UUD 1945 dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Ali, M. Mahrus; Widjaja, Alia Harumdani; Hilipito, Meyrinda Rahmawaty
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 4 (2018)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (435.131 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1548

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi seringkali menimbulkan perdebatan di masyarakat. Salah satunya terkait penundaan keberlakuan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang telah melahirkan doktrin baru mengenai kekuatan hukum mengikatnya putusan MK. Penelitian ini mengangkat permasalahan, pertama: karakter putusan MK yang memuat tenggang waktu konstitusionalitas dan konsep kebersesuaian undang-undang dengan UUD 1945. Kedua, pengaruh putusan tersebut terhadap pembangunan hukum di Indonesia. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa, pertama, putusan-putusan yang menjadi objek penelitian ditemukan karakteristik yang beragam terkait dengan tenggang waktu konstitusionalitas dan kebersesuaian antara Undang-Undang dan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, sebagai berikut; (i) Putusan yang menentukan tenggang waktu secara tegas dan perintah untuk penyesuaian dengan UUD 1945, yaitu putusan Nomor 012-016-019/PUU-IV/2006 (UU KPK) dan Putusan Nomor 32/PUU-XI/2013 (UU Asuransi) dan Putusan Nomor 026/PUU-III/2005 dan 026/PUU-IV/2006 (UU APBN); (ii) Putusan yang menentukan tenggang waktu secara tidak tegas (fleksibel) dan perintah untuk penyesuaian dengan UUD 1945, yaitu Putusan Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 (UU Pemda dan UU Kekuasaan Kehakiman) dan Putusan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 (UU Pilpres); (iii) Putusan yang tidak menyebutkan tenggang waktu namun hanya perintah untuk penyesuaian dengan UUD 1945 (secara tidak langsung), yaitu Putusan Nomor 28/PUU-XI/2013 (UU Koperasi) dan Putusan Nomor 85/PUUXI/2013 (UU SDA). Kedua, Putusan MK menjadi salah satu faktor determinan dalam fungsi legislasi, dan hal ini dapat dipahami karena inilah bentuk diskresi yang dimiliki oleh MK selaku pelaku kekuasaan kehakiman.The constitutional court often make their headlines or controversy with their ruling. One of them is relative with the postpone enforcement of a decision which has raised a new doctrine about legal force's binding of the Constitutional Court's decision. This study raised the issue, first, about the character of the constitutional court's ruling which contained the limitation of time in constitutionality and the concept of conformity of the law with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Second, the influence of the court decision on legal development in Indonesia. This study used normative legal research. The results of the study concluded that, first, it is founded that the various characteristics related to the limitation of time in constitutionality in the court's decision which become the object of this study and also it is founded that the compability between the law and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as follows : (i) The court's decision that set the limited of time in constitutionality explicitly and orders to adjust to the 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia, namely decisions number 012-016-019/PUU-IV/2006 (Corruption Eradication Commission Act) and decision number 32/PUU-XI/2013 (Insurance Related Business Act) and decision number 026/PUU-III/2005 and 026/PUU-IV/2006 (State Budget Act); (ii) Court's decision that determine the limited of constitutionality flexibly and orders to adjust to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia namely decision number 97/PUU-XI/2013 (Regional Government Act and Judicial Power Act) and decision number 14/PUU-XI/2013 (Presidential Election Act); (iii) Court's decision that do not mention the limitation of time in constitutionality but only orders to adjust to the 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia, namely decision number 28/PUU-XI/2013 (Cooperatives Act) and decision number 85/PUU-XI/2013 (Water Resources Act). Secondly, the constitutional court decision is one of the determinant factors in the function of legislation, and this can be understood because this is the form of discretion that the constitutional court has as the perpetrator of judicial power.
Co-Authors Alia Harumdani Widjaja, Alia Harumdani Asy’ari, Syukri Irfan Nur Rachman, Irfan Nur Meyrinda Rahmawaty Hilipito, Meyrinda Rahmawaty Putria Gusti Asih, Putria Gusti Rio Tri Juli Putranto, Rio Tri Juli Titis Anindyajati, Titis Winda Wijayanti