Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sinkron : Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika
Erene Gernaria Sihombing
Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia
Computer Science & IT

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Collaboration of Profile Matching and MCDM-AHP Methods on Employee Selection for Promotion Akmaludin Akmaludin; Erene Gernaria Sihombing; Linda Sari Dewi; Rinawati Rinawati; Ester Arisawati
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): Articles Research Volume 7 Issue 2, April 2022
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i1.11203

Abstract

To give appreciation to every employee who has been able to understand the journey of the system in a company, it is appropriate to be given appreciation in the process of changing leadership and as a form of motivation for all employees in the company as a form of promotion. The promotion process must be carried out objectively, so that a good leadership change system can be seen as a strength in the company's survival for each period. The process of changing leadership through promotions is at the forefront of running a sustainable company. With so many employees, the biggest obstacle that often becomes crucial is how to select the leadership relay holder through promotions in the company that can be carried out objectively, thus a method is needed. worthy to be used as a benchmark for selecting employees in terms of promotion. There is a method that can be used for employee selection as a form of promotion, namely the profile matching method through the assessment of the weight of the Aspects and the magnitude of the GAP value with the concept of determining the largest rank as the winner in the selection process for promoted employees. Of the six employees who are appointed as candidates for leadership candidates through promotions, they will be selected consistently with a number of criteria as a barometer of the selection process. The results obtained through the promotion of positions in the leadership change process were the first rank was elected KR02 (4.67), followed by the second rank KR01 (4.65) and the third rank KR05 (4.46). Thus, it can be said that the combination of profile matching and MCDM-AHP methods can be used to carry out the employee selection process as a form of promotion.  
Comparison of Evaluation and Selection of SmartPhones Recommended AHP, Weight Sum Model, and Weight Product Akmaludin Akmaludin; Erene Gernaria Sihombing; Linda Sari Dewi; Rinawati Rinawati; Ester Arisawati
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): Article Research: Volume 7 Number 4, October 2022
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11366

Abstract

Advances in SmartPhone technology in the current era, make many users have more and more considerations to have a SmartPhone because there are many criteria that must be compared. The purpose of this paper is to give careful consideration for every user to have an optimal SmartPhone. Problems that are felt by many users as users find it difficult to make choices for electronic goods in the form of this SmartPhone. Thus, a number of methods are needed that are able to give careful and intelligent consideration to the user in order to obtain the acquisition of the electronic goods in the form of the SmartPhone. In short, the method that can be used to evaluate and select SmartPhones is the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) which functions as a weight determination, while the Weight Sum Model (WSM) and Weight Product (WP) act as a ranking system. This method will be used to provide an optimal comparison value for SmartPhone products with decisions that can be seen based on the priority of the WSM vector and the WP vector, then based on the average of the two methods provide decision support results. The first position is Xiaomi Mi Max with a weight of 175 and followed sequentially onwards by Asus Zenfone Max ZC550KL (174), Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime (124), Lenovo Vibe Shot (117), Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML (113), Xiaomi Mi 4C (108 ), Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus (101), and finally the Samsung Galaxy A3 (89). Thus the combination method between the AHP, WSM and WP methods can provide the best solution with optimal results for decision-making support for comparison evaluation and selection in the form of a SmartPhone with optimal results.
Co-Authors Akmaludin Akmaludin Akmaludin Akmaludin Ester Arisawati Linda Sari Dewi Linda Sari Dewi Rinawati