Akmaludin Akmaludin
Universitas Nusa Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Comparison of Evaluation and Selection of SmartPhones Recommended AHP, Weight Sum Model, and Weight Product Akmaludin Akmaludin; Erene Gernaria Sihombing; Linda Sari Dewi; Rinawati Rinawati; Ester Arisawati
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): Article Research: Volume 7 Number 4, October 2022
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11366

Abstract

Advances in SmartPhone technology in the current era, make many users have more and more considerations to have a SmartPhone because there are many criteria that must be compared. The purpose of this paper is to give careful consideration for every user to have an optimal SmartPhone. Problems that are felt by many users as users find it difficult to make choices for electronic goods in the form of this SmartPhone. Thus, a number of methods are needed that are able to give careful and intelligent consideration to the user in order to obtain the acquisition of the electronic goods in the form of the SmartPhone. In short, the method that can be used to evaluate and select SmartPhones is the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) which functions as a weight determination, while the Weight Sum Model (WSM) and Weight Product (WP) act as a ranking system. This method will be used to provide an optimal comparison value for SmartPhone products with decisions that can be seen based on the priority of the WSM vector and the WP vector, then based on the average of the two methods provide decision support results. The first position is Xiaomi Mi Max with a weight of 175 and followed sequentially onwards by Asus Zenfone Max ZC550KL (174), Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime (124), Lenovo Vibe Shot (117), Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML (113), Xiaomi Mi 4C (108 ), Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus (101), and finally the Samsung Galaxy A3 (89). Thus the combination method between the AHP, WSM and WP methods can provide the best solution with optimal results for decision-making support for comparison evaluation and selection in the form of a SmartPhone with optimal results.
Application of the AHP-ELECTRE Method for Selection OOP Based Apps Programs Akmaludin Akmaludin; Adhi Dharma Suriyanto; Nandang Iriadi; Budi Santoso; Bilal Abdul Wahid
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 7 No. 4 (2022): Article Research: Volume 7 Number 4, October 2022
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v7i4.11370

Abstract

Object-based programming (OOP) has become a trend among programming language users, this is because many functions, procedures and techniques for using features are so widely available. By utilizing the advantages of these facilities, it is possible to provide convenience for programmers who use object-based programming languages. The purpose of this study is to provide an objective scoring system for a number of programming applications that have been made equipped with the assessment criteria. Assessment criteria that can be used for object-based apps programs with eleven criteria, namely Class structure, Inheritance, Encapsulation, Pollymorphys, Constructur, Accessor, Mutator, Visibility, Overriding, Overloading, and Price. With these many criteria, it provides a level of difficulty in choosing an object-based program application. To determine the appropriateness of an apps program, source testing will be carried out in the form of coding that has been previously constructed which affects the eleven predetermined measurement criteria. The assessment process recommends using the Electre method as a measure of the results of the calculation and ranking process. While determining the weight of the criteria using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. From the results of the assessment of 23 object-based apps programs, ranking assessments are based on aggregate dominant matrices as follows, the first rank with a weight of 22 as the largest weight is owned by 4 apps programss, namely AP16, AP17, AP18, and AP19. Based on the results of the ranking process, it can be said that the ELECTRE and AHP methods can be used as a selection process for object-based apps programs with optimal results.
Decision Support for Selection of The Best Teachers Recommendations MCDM-AHP and ARAS Collaborative Methods Akmaludin Akmaludin; Erene Gernaria S.; Rinawati Rinawati; Ester Arisawati; Linda Sari Dewi
Sinkron : jurnal dan penelitian teknik informatika Vol. 8 No. 4 (2023): Article Research Volume 8 Issue 4, October 2023
Publisher : Politeknik Ganesha Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.12354

Abstract

The role of the teacher is very important for the progress of the nation which can increase the dignity of the nation. The quality of education can increase thanks to the support of teachers who have good dedication in developing the learning process, especially in curriculum development. The teacher's biggest contribution is to make students ready to become the nation's credible successors. The purpose of this study is to provide an assessment in the selection process of teachers in an objective and selective manner. Method recommendations that can be raised in this study are collaborative methods that play a role in multi-criteria selection, namely MCDM-AHP and ARAS. Both of these methods can be said to be able to implement a selective and credible selection process for teachers which is carried out through the stages of data conversion and normalization which in turn can determine decision support in the multi-criteria selection process. The results of this study provide the best solution in selecting alternatives with a multi-criteria barometer for measurements with the ARAS method. The resulting decision support for the selection process of twenty teachers resulting in the best assessment can be seen from the optimization function which is based on the maximum value default divisor basis. The results obtained from obtaining the highest utility value of the twenty alternatives, the top three values that can be drawn as support for decision making are owned by A3 with a utility weight of 0.891, followed by the two highest ratings A17 and A14 with respective weights of 0.888 and 0.884.