Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal on Education Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Sahlan Tampubolon
Nommensen HKBP University Medan
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Effect Of Using Gist Strategy Toward The First Year Students’ Reading Comprehension At SMAN 1 Beringin Stevani Anastasya Sitorus; Putri Daud Simanjuntak; Diana Sihombing; Sahlan Tampubolon; Tiarma Intan Marpaung
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK) Vol. 4 No. 5 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jpdk.v4i5.6899

Abstract

Menurut penelitian pendahuluan yang dilakukan oleh penulis, siswa di sekolah tidak dapat memahami makna teks dalam buku teks mereka. Berbagai faktor berkontribusi terhadap masalah ini. Penulis, misalnya, tertarik untuk melakukan penelitian tentang topik ini karena beberapa siswa tidak memahami isi teks bacaan dan tidak dapat mengidentifikasi informasi rinci dalam teks. Misi dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan jenis dan fungsi teks bacaan. menggunakan strategi GIST untuk meningkatkan pemahaman membaca siswa tahun pertama di SMAN 1 Beringin. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif eksperimental untuk menganalisis data menggunakan strategi GIST. 260 siswa mengambil bagian dalam penelitian ini. Karena jumlah populasi yang kecil, maka penelitian ini menggunakan random sampling dengan dua kelas sebagai sampel: X1 adalah kelompok eksperimen, dengan 15 siswa, dan X6 adalah kelompok kontrol, dengan 15 siswa, dengan total 30 sampel dari dua kelas. . Untuk menganalisis data, penelitian ini menggunakan rumus uji-t berpasangan manual. Setelah menganalisis data, penelitian menemukan nilai persentase siswa. Akibatnya, Ha didukung sementara Ho ditolak. Ini berarti bahwa penggunaan Strategi GIST meningkatkan pemahaman membaca siswa tahun pertama di SMAN 1 Beringin.
Error Analysis Made By The Students’ Fifth Semester of HKBP Nommensen University In Writing Explanation Text Anita Theresia Br Saragi; Sahlan Tampubolon; Rina Octavia Simarmata; Juliaster Marbun
Journal on Education Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Journal on Education: Volume 5 Nomor 4 Mei-Agustus 2023
Publisher : Departement of Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joe.v5i4.2698

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out students' mistakes in writing explanatory text. For that the researcher will look at the results of student writing. The researcher wants to know what mistakes students make when writing explanatory texts and how these types of errors affect students' abilities in writing explanation texts. This research is qualitative in nature. Interviews were conducted to support the data obtained from students' answers to writing tests about explanatory texts. Interviews were used to find out the circumstances that led to student errors, and written tests were used to measure each student's learning level. As many as 32 fifth semester HKBP students from Nommensen University Medan took part. Based on student experiences, data analysis determines which types of errors are more common than the data. From the results of the written test, the authors found 119 data errors. There were 44 omission category errors made by 22 students; 29 errors in the addition category were made by 17 students; 24 errors in the misformation category were made by 11 students; 16 mistakes in the wrong misordering category were made by 13 students; 2 errors in the archive forms category were made by 2 students; 4 mistakes in the alternating form category were made by 3 students. Errors in student writing are caused by the following: Grammatical and vocabulary errors.
An Analysis Of Coherence And Cohesive Device In Writing Recount Text Used By The Fifth Semester Students Of English Department In HKBP Nommensen University Nia Andriaty Manullang; Sahlan Tampubolon; Nurhayati Sitorus; Rina Octavia Simarmata
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v3i2.761

Abstract

Coherence is characterized by the use of supporting details arranged in such a way that the information intended to be conveyed, and the frequent use of time and sequences to convey supporting information can appear at once. This study explains how the fifth-semester students' mastery of the types of cohesion and coherence in writing recount texts and the difficulties faced by students. The data obtained came from students' writing tests in recount texts and interview tests. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. In this study, 20 fifth-semester students of English education study programs. Data analysis was found in the form of the number of each type of cohesion and coherence from the students' writing test and using the answers to the interview test. In the results of the writing test in writing recount text, the writer found 946 uses of cohesion and coherence devices, divided into 568 services of references (60.04%), 11 substitutions (1.16%), 8 ellipses (0.84%), 237 conjunction (25.05%), repetition of 47 (4.96%), then there are synonyms with 14 uses (1.47%), 1 antonym (0.10%), keywords repeated with as many as 21 uses (2.21%), 11 pronoun references (1.16%), 14 signs/transition words (1.47%), and logical ideas (1.47%). Based on student interview papers, 10 students faced problems. There are 3 votes for each type of grammatical cohesion, 2 for each type of lexical cohesion and 5 for each type of coherence, 2 for grammar, 1 for vocabulary, and 2 for constructing story ideas. Cohesion is a type of problem that students rarely complain about, while coherence is the type of problem most often complained about by students.
Co-Authors Anita Theresia Br Saragi Diana Sihombing Juliaster Marbun Nia Andriaty Manullang Nurhayati Sitorus Putri Daud Simanjuntak Rina Octavia Simarmata Stevani Anastasya Sitorus Tiarma Intan Marpaung