Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Implementasi Metode Small Group Discussion untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Fikih Peserta Didik Naufal Naufal; Nur Soimah
IBTIDA- Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar Vol 2 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Prodi PGMI IAINU Kebeumen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33507/ibtida.v2i2.1003

Abstract

The aims of this study is: 1) Knowing the use of the Small Group Discussion method in fiqhlearning for class X MA tanbihul Ghofilin Bawang students; 2) Knowing the difference betweenlearning activities using the Small Group discussion method and those who do not use the smallgroup discussion method in class X MA Tanbihul Ghofilin students; 3) Knowing the increasein learning activities using the small group discussion method for class X MA TanbihulGhofilin Bawang students. The research according to experimental methods using nonequivalent control group design. The subjects in this study were students of class X Agama 3and X Agama 4 MA Tanbihul Ghofilin which totaled 60 students who were divided into twogroups, namely class X Agama 3 as the Experimental class and Class X Religious 4 as thecontrol class. Learning begins with providing pretest questions to find out the extent of studentlearning activities. Experimental students were given learning using the small group discussionmethod while the control group used conventional learning methods. The experimental groupand the control group were given the final test in the form of posttest questions in writing. Thenthe results were processed, analyzed, and compared using a t-test and a scor gain test todetermine the differences and activities between the two groups to be studied. The resultsshowed that there were differences in learning activities between the experimental class andthe control class with evidenced by the t-test and the control class with evidenced by the t-testcalculation showing tcount of count 2,0001 > ttable 10.6 with a significance level 0f 5 % anddegress of freedom 58. It was proveb by the calculation of N-gain of 0,76 with category
ANALISIS PENGUASAAN LAHAN MENGGUNAKAN PENGINDERAAN JAUH PADA KAWASAN HUTAN PRODUKSI TETAP DI DESA KALE KO’MARA Kristina Sara Bandangan; Naufal Naufal; Sultan Sultan; Andi Azis Abdullah; Hasanuddin Molo
Jurnal Belantara Vol 6 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Forestry Study Program University Of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jbl.v6i2.924

Abstract

Land cover is one of the important data that is always changing dynamically. This study aims to determine land cover changed in 2002 and 2022; and find out the indications of land tenure on the 2021 PPTPKH Indicative Map in the Permanent Production Forest Area of the Komara Forest Group in Kale Ko'mara Village, North Polombangkeng District, Takalar Regency, South Sulawesi Province. This research was conducted from May to August 2022. The data used include primary data which consists of landsat 7 imagery in 2002 and drone’s orthophoto in 2022; secondary data consists of the digital data of the forest area, the 2021 PPTPKH Indicative Map, and the Indonesian Official Topographic Maps. Analysis data by using remote sensing approached and GIS technique such as interpretation of imagery, overlay, and tabulation.  The research showed: (1) the results of the analysis of land cover changes in 2002 and 2022 are secondary dry land forest has increased by 112.81 hectares, shrubs has decreased by 175.70 hectares, dry land agriculture has increased by 195.87 hectares, mixed dry land agriculture has decreased by 139.31 hectares, open land has increased by 2.88 hectares, and water body has increased by 3.45 hectares; (2) the results of data analysis of land tenure indications on the 2021 PPTPKH Indicative Map are being indicated not controlled and been in the indicative map is 4.75 hectares, being indicated not controlled and been outside the indicative map is 123.87 hectares, being indicated controlled and been in the indicative map is 105.50 hectares, being indicated controlled and been outside the indicative map is 126.20 hectares, it has not been identified whether there is any indication of control and been in the indicative map is 8.77 hectares, it has not been identified whether there is any indication of control and been outside the indicative map is 13.35 hectares.  
ANALISIS KESESUAIAN FUNGSI KAWASAN HUTAN DI DESA MANDALLE KECAMATAN MANDALLE KABUPATEN PANGKAJENE DAN KEPULAUAN Sitti Fatimah; Naufal Naufal; Andi Azis Abdullah; Hasanuddin Molo; Sultan Sultan
Jurnal Belantara Vol 6 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Forestry Study Program University Of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jbl.v6i2.947

Abstract

The determination of forest areas in 1982, which is the basis for the function of forest areas, is currently considered to be less relevant, this is due to the large number of activities that are not in accordance with their designation and the presence of a new policy of the Ministry of Agriculture in 2021 where forest areas need to be reviewed using predetermined criteria. This study aims to determine the suitability of function of forest areas in Mandalle Village, which is currently based on the Decree of the Minister of Environment and Forestry number SK.362/MENLHK/SETJEN/PLA.0/5/2019 is a Protected Forest Area(Hutan Lindung). This research method uses the method of scoring forest areas with 3 (three) parameters, namely marbles, soil type and rainfall. From the results of this analysis, it is known that the steep slope class (25-40%) covers an area of 90.64 hectares with a percentage of 35.29% and the smallest the Flat slope class (0-8%) covers an area of 3.69 hectares with a percentage of 1.44%. The average rainfall at the study site was 14.78 mm / day (low) and the soil type of the study site was Podzolic which was categorized as sensitive soil.The results showed that the Protected Forest Area in Mandalle Village Mandalle Subdistrict Pangkajene and Islands Regency an area of ± 70,66 hectares (27,52%) suitable as Protected Forest, an area of ± 157,44 hectares (61,31%) directed as a Fixed Production Forest and an area of ± 28,69 hectares (11,17%) is directed as a Convertible Production Forest.