Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Telaah Kritis terhadap Pemikiran Maqasid shari‘ah al-Shatiby tentang Wasiat Wajibah Zainal Arifin; Tutik Hamidah; Noer Yasin
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Vol 25 No 1 (2022): Al-Qanun, Vol. 25, No. 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alqanun.2022.25.1.112-127

Abstract

The development of Islamic law in Indonesia from time to time shows relatively rapid developments, one of which is the obligatory will listed in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) Article 209 Paragraphs 1 and 2. The obligatory will refers to taking property from adoptive parents to adopted children or from adopted children to adoptive parents through a mandatory court decision, whether the person who died said or wrote a will while alive. This KHI is a set of Islamic laws which is the product of Indonesian scholars to answer issues that occur in society and become an official reference for judges. This article uses a library research approach and a qualitative-juridical-philosophical method. Then it is analyzed using maqasid shari'ah al-Shatiby, in terms of problems that align with the goals of shari'ah. The objective of the writing is to find out whether the concept of the obligatory will listed in the KHI is in accordance with the purposes of the shari'a to create the benefit of the ummah or not.   Abstrak: Perkembangan hukum islam di Indonesia dari masa ke masa menunjukkan perkembangan yang cukup pesat, salah satunya adalah wasiat wajibah yang tercantum dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Pasal 209 Ayat 1 dan 2. Wasiat wajibah yang di maksud dalam KHI ini adalah pengambilan harta dari orang tua angkat untuk anak angkat atau dari anak angkat untuk orang tua angkat melalui keputusan pengadialan yang bersifat wajib, baik orang yang meninggal tersebut mengucapkan atau menulis wasiat Ketika hidup atau tidak. KHI ini adalah merupakan sekumpulan hukum islam yang merupakan hasil produk ulama Indonesia untuk menjawab permasalahan-permasalahan yang terjadi di masyarakat dan menjadi rujukan hakim secara resmi. Artikel ini menggunakan pendekatan library reserch dan metode kualitatif-yuridis filosofis, kemudian di analisis menggunakan maqasid syari’ah al-Shatiby, dilihat dari segi maslahah yang sesuai dengan tujuan syari’at. Apakah konsep wasiat wajibah yang tercantum dalam KHI sudah sesuai dengan tujuan syariat untuk menciptakan kemaslahahan ummat atau tidak.  
FIKIH BARU JAMAL AL-BANNA: KRITIK TERHADAP TERTUTUPNYA PINTU IJTIHAD Zainal Arifin; Mohammad Fauzan Ni'ami; Noor Rizqiya Fimaulidina
Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan Vol 9, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/almaqasid.v9i2.9515

Abstract

 This research is motivated by the doctrine of the closed door of ijtihad. The implication is that around the 19th century figures emerged who constructively criticized this doctrine. The reason the researcher chose Jamal al-Banna was because he was one of the reformers of Islamic law who tried to reconstruct Islamic law with the paradigm of reason and freedom of authenticity (al-Bara'ah al-Ashliyyah). This article tries to examine further how the stagnation of critical doctrine carried out by Jamal al-Banna and how coercion resulted from this criticism. This article finds that there is a structuralist essence in Jamal al-Banna's critique of ijtihad. The door to Ijtihad is not closed as long as humans have reason. Therefore, reason is the initial foundation in efforts to formulate the fiqh Jadid which was initiated by Jamal al-Banna.   
FIKIH BARU JAMAL AL-BANNA: KRITIK TERHADAP TERTUTUPNYA PINTU IJTIHAD Zainal Arifin; Mohammad Fauzan Ni'ami; Noor Rizqiya Fimaulidina
Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan Vol 9, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/almaqasid.v9i2.9515

Abstract

 This research is motivated by the doctrine of the closed door of ijtihad. The implication is that around the 19th century figures emerged who constructively criticized this doctrine. The reason the researcher chose Jamal al-Banna was because he was one of the reformers of Islamic law who tried to reconstruct Islamic law with the paradigm of reason and freedom of authenticity (al-Bara'ah al-Ashliyyah). This article tries to examine further how the stagnation of critical doctrine carried out by Jamal al-Banna and how coercion resulted from this criticism. This article finds that there is a structuralist essence in Jamal al-Banna's critique of ijtihad. The door to Ijtihad is not closed as long as humans have reason. Therefore, reason is the initial foundation in efforts to formulate the fiqh Jadid which was initiated by Jamal al-Banna.