Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tsaqofah: Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia YASIN: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Budaya
Dela Anisa
Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Implementasi Sistem Penilaian pada Kurikulum Merdeka di SDN Pondok Jengkol Kabupaten Tangerang Ina Magdalena; Dela Anisa; Nada Salsabila; Tarisa Amalia A
TSAQOFAH Vol 3 No 2 (2023): MARET
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v3i2.959

Abstract

The final assessment in the SDN environment isbthe goalkof thislstudy, whichgaims tojdetermine whether or not the implementation of learning design is successful. An implementation is one that is meticulously planned and executed. A straightforward definition of the term "implementation of learning" would be "applicationpof learningdinlgeneral." An activity in summativedassessment results in numerical or numerical scores that are used to evaluate a student's performance. If the unit of learninglexperience orfthe entiredsubject matterchas beenxcompleted, this assessment activity is carried out. By reading, recording, and processing research materials, a qualitative description method waskusedraspthedresearchnmethod. Accordingdto theifindings ofkthe study, the diagnostic assessment aims to identify students' initial conditions and basic abilities. Non-cognitive diagnostic assessment and cognitive diagnostic assessment are the two types of diagnostic assessment. The goal of the Merdeka Learningxcurriculum is toxfoster ahpositive learningaenvironment. Theigoalhof independentjlearningkis to create a happy environment for teachers, students, and parents.
Identifikasi Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menjawab Pertanyaan dalam Memahami Konsep Matematika Sekolah Dasar Mengenai Bangun Datar Een Unaenah; Azayya Syafinka; Dela Anisa; Zahra Weningtyas
YASIN Vol 3 No 6 (2023): DESEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/yasin.v3i6.1594

Abstract

This study aims to identify students' mistakes in answering questions about the mathematical concept of flat shapes at the elementary school level. The background of this research is based on the important role of understanding mathematical concepts in learning and the importance of overcoming student mistakes to improve learning outcomes. The research instrument used was a written test containing several questions about the concept of flat shapes that had been compiled and validated by experts in mathematics education. The data collected from this test is then analyzed using statistical methods to identify patterns of errors that are often made by students. The results showed that most students experienced errors in understanding the concept of plane shapes, especially in recognizing the geometric properties of plane shapes and calculating their area and perimeter. Some common mistakes include incorrectly identifying the number of sides and angles in certain planes, mistakes in using the area and perimeter calculation formulas, and difficulties in understanding the relationship between different planes. This finding shows the important role of educators in understanding students' mistakes and developing appropriate teaching strategies to help students improve their understanding of the mathematical concept of flat shapes. The implications of the results of this study can be used as a basis for developing learning programs that are more effective in increasing students' understanding of mistakes in answering questions in understanding elementary school mathematics concepts regarding flat shapes.
Co-Authors Azayya Syafinka Een Unaenah Ina Magdalena Nada Salsabila Tarisa Amalia A Zahra Weningtyas