Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.123
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) Journal of Language and Literature Sintesis English and Literature Journal Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching Eralingua : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature Humaniora Linguistik Indonesia Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature
Truly Almendo Pasaribu
Universitas Sanata Dharma
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS)

 1 
GENDER DIFFERENCES AND THE USE OF METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN WRITING ESSAYS Pasaribu, Truly Almendo
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) Vol 1, No 1 (2017): September 2017
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (830.22 KB) | DOI: 10.24071/ijhs.v1i1.683

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims at investigating metadiscourse markers in academic essays written by male and female students. With the goal in mind, 20 essays written by EFL female students and 20 essays written by EFL male students were chosen. These data were analyzed based on the metadiscourse framework proposed by Hyland (2005). The findings revealed that both male and female writers employed more interactive markers than interactional markers due to the fact that both genders inserted transition markers frequently to guide readers through the texts. However, a cultural factor may influence the writers’ tendency not to use transition markers showing arguments. Furthermore, although male students employed more interactional markers, female students used more markers in interactional sub-categories except self-mentions. Although it is assumed that women prefer to use a more personalized style, male writers in this study also personalized their essays by using self-mentions. One possible reason was that the use of these features tended to be more field-specific than gender-specific. The findings and discussion indicated that gender is not the only factor influencing the use of metadiscourse markers. Other possible variables discussed in this study should be taken into account.DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010110 
GENDER DIFFERENCES AND THE USE OF METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN WRITING ESSAYS Truly Almendo Pasaribu
International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) Vol 1, No 1 (2017): September 2017
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/ijhs.v1i1.683

Abstract

This study aims at investigating metadiscourse markers in academic essays written by male and female students. With the goal in mind, 20 essays written by EFL female students and 20 essays written by EFL male students were chosen. These data were analyzed based on the metadiscourse framework proposed by Hyland (2005). The findings revealed that both male and female writers employed more interactive markers than interactional markers due to the fact that both genders inserted transition markers frequently to guide readers through the texts. However, a cultural factor may influence the writers tendency not to use transition markers showing arguments. Furthermore, although male students employed more interactional markers, female students used more markers in interactional sub-categories except self-mentions. Although it is assumed that women prefer to use a more personalized style, male writers in this study also personalized their essays by using self-mentions. One possible reason was that the use of these features tended to be more field-specific than gender-specific. The findings and discussion indicated that gender is not the only factor influencing the use of metadiscourse markers. Other possible variables discussed in this study should be taken into account.
Co-Authors A. Effendi Kadarisman Alfonsa Saskia Ardanellia Arsa, Yohanes Bram, Barli Cayestu, Teresa Avilla Ayuning Budi Citra Yudha Widyanita Danang Satria Nugraha Dinda Adventina Laksita Puri Euodia Inge Gavenila Gavenila, Euodia Inge J. B. Gunawan Mega Wulandari Monica Ella Harendita Monica Ella Harendita Monica Ella Harendita, Monica Ella Puri, Dinda Adventina Laksita Widyanita, Citra Yudha Yohanes Arsa Yuseva Ariyani Iswandari