Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.784
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Khazanah Informatika: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika Creative Information Technology Journal Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ Jurnal Ilmiah Sinus REMIK : Riset dan E-Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputer Jurnal Teknik Informatika C.I.T. Medicom Jurnal Informa: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Responsif : Riset Sains dan Informatika Abdi Teknoyasa INCOME: Indonesian Journal of Community Service and Engagement SmartComp
Wiwit Supriyanti
Universitas Muhammadiyah Karanganyar
Humanities Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Social Sciences Other

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Teknik Informatika C.I.T. Medicom

 1 
Comparative analysis of the sensitivity test of the SAW and WP methods in scholarship selection Wiwit Supriyanti
Jurnal Teknik Informatika C.I.T Medicom Vol 15 No 2 (2023): May: Intelligent Decision Support System (IDSS)
Publisher : Institute of Computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/cit.Vol15.2023.471.pp84-95

Abstract

Decision-makers frequently use the MADM (Multiple Attribute Decision Making) method to assist in solving decision-making issues. This approach can use a variety of algorithms, including Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP). The challenge in this research is determining which of the SAW and WP approaches is more pertinent or acceptable for solving scenarios involving scholarship recipient selection. Five factors were taken into consideration when deciding who would receive a scholarship: academic achievement index (GPA), parents' income, past accomplishments, participation in student organizations, and the number of parents' dependents. A sensitivity test, which involves altering the weight of each test method's criterion and then comparing the percentage change between the two ways, is one method that can be used to gauge the effectiveness of the MADM method. The SAW method implementation results show that alternative nine (MHS9) has the highest preference value, which is 0.95. The WP method implementation results show that alternative nine (MHS9) has the highest preference value, which is 0.12. The total change in the findings of the sensitivity test for the SAW method is 7.64%, compared to 2.06% for the WP method. Thus, it can be inferred that the SAW approach is thought to be pertinent for addressing the issue of choosing scholarship applicants.
Co-Authors Armadyah Amborowati Dimas Aryo Anggoro Dyah Ayu Pertiwi Herlambang Prihantoro Kusrini Kusrini Maryam Norma Puspitasari Nova Tri Romadloni Rika Putri Utami Safar Dwi Kurniawan Tri Saga Novianto Yayu Sri Rahayu