Helena Verusha Ali
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Current Studies on Pragmatics Competence in EFL Learning Context: A Review Bayu Andika Prasatyo; Helena Verusha Ali; Dini Hidayati
Jurnal Sinestesia Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Studi Bahasa dan Publikasi Ilmiah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pragmatic competence has hitherto been one of the concerns that has received attention in the area as a vital element of linguistic competence. This conceptual study showcases a brief overview of pragmatics competence in EFL learning environment by highlighting what study designs have been utilized in contemporary research that focuses on pragmatic competence in the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning and what the implications of fostering pragmatic competence are elaborated in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom under the realm of pragmatics study. The design of the study utilizes library research method. The present study presents a collection of empirical research examining pragmatic competence within English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning contexts. The research methodologies implemented in these studies mostly consist of descriptive qualitative techniques, mixed methods, with only a limited number of studies utilizing the quantitative approach. Furthermore, the impact of sociopragmatic competence is significant in enhancing the communication abilities of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners.
Comparing The Argumentative Essay Formats of Indonesian and Korean Students Using the Toulmin Model Yanuarius Yanu Dharmawan; Helena Verusha Ali; Bayu Andika Prasatyo; Amaliah Amaliah
Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30605/onoma.v9i2.2922

Abstract

This study's overarching goal is to dissect and contrast the organizational framework of persuasive compositions generated by Indonesian and Korean (South Korean) pupils who are acquiring English as a secondary language, utilizing the Toulmin model as a theoretical framework for argument assessment. The research sample consisted of five participants from Indonesia, five participants from Korea, five female participants from Indonesia, and five female participants from Korea. Typically, individuals originate from diverse educational and vocational contexts. The articles generated by the authors served as the focal point of an analysis that employed elements of the Toulmin framework. The research's findings imply that there is no appreciable difference between men's and women's levels of reasoning in the two countries. It was evident that a discernible distinction among the participants was the absence of counterargument sections in certain individuals. This study holds significant importance in terms of examining the impact of cultural factors inherent in each nation and its language on the principles of argumentative writing. The results obtained from the investigation conducted in this research. can be employed to improve pedagogical strategies and facilitate the development of writing curricula that are culturally appropriate. It is anticipated that future investigations will facilitate the examination of additional linguistic and cultural attributes, as well as the broadening of the research's purview to encompass a more heterogeneous cohort hailing from a greater array of nations, as well as persons with differing levels of scholarly attainment.