Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Sekuritisasi Isu Imigran di Amerika Serikat di Masa Pemerintahan Donald Trump Anisa Usman; Haiyyu Darman Moenir; Bima Jon Nanda
Palito Vol. 1 No. 01 (2022): PALITO (Politics, Humanities, Laws, International Relations and Social)
Publisher : Palito

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/palito.1.01.45-58.2022

Abstract

The issue of securitization regarding immigrants in the US is an issue that has become a public discussion since Donald Trump campaign as a US presidential candidate in the 2016 election. He has publicly conveyed xenophobic anti-immigrant rhetoric. Researchers assume that the existence of securitization makes the issue of immigrants a threat that endangers US nationalsecurity. This is done by conveying speech acts to influence public opinion, thus making the issue of immigrants a problem that requires emergency handling or extraordinary policies that have never been carried out by the previous government. This study aims to describe the stagesof the securitization process on the issue of immigrants in the US during the Donald Trump administration. This research was analyzed with the conceptual framework of the securitization stages of Barry Buzan, Waever, and Jaap de Wilde, which consisted of the stage of raising the issue and the stage of convincing the audience. This research method uses a qualitative approach with descriptive-analytical research and uses secondary data sources. This study found that the securitization process begins with the stages of raising issues through the role of the mass media, the influence of the Republican party promoted by Donald Trump, then continues with the stage of convincing the audience through the delivery of speeches by Donald Trump, Sebastian Gorka, Michael Flynn and Jeff Sessions. Then by issuing emergency and securitization measures legitimized by the audience as evidenced by the increasing US public voice supporting the expansion of the US-Mexico border wall.
Analisis Pemulihan Hubungan Bilateral Indonesia dan Australia Pascapenyadapan Tahun 2013 Ikhsan Yovi Maulana; Zulkifli Harza; Bima Jon Nanda
Palito Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): PALITO (Politics, Humanities, Laws, International Relations and Social)
Publisher : Palito

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/palito.1.02.1-16.2022

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mendorong Indonesia menormalisasi hubungan bilateral Indonesia dan Australia pascapenyadapan tahun 2013. Penyadapan yang dilakukan Australia terkuak pada tahun 2013, Indonesia merespons dengan melakukan penarikan perwakilan diplomatik negara dan memberhentikan sementara hubungan ekonomi, politik, dan keamanan. Indonesia menginginkan klarifikasi dan permintaan maaf dari Australia, namun pemerintah Australia menolak melakukan hal tersebut. Tindakan Australia tersebut dikecam oleh Indonesia karena dianggap telah meremehkan Indonesia. Meskipun permintaan maaf tersebut tidak terpenuhi, namun langkah-langkah normalisasi lebih agresif dilakukan Indonesia. Faktor-faktor yang mendorong Indonesia menormalisasi hubungan bilateral dengan Australia akan diteliti menggunakan konsep yang dikemukakan oleh Ethan Zawatsky dan Ashley Gemma yaitu normalisasi yang memiliki empat faktor yaitu political turnover, economic interest, interest groups, dan public sentiment. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Peneliti menemukan bahwa dari keempat faktor pendorong normalisasi terdapat dua indikator yang terpenuhi menjadi pendorong Indonesia menormalisasi hubungan bilateral Indonesia dan Australia pascapenyadapan tahun 2013, yaitu economic interest dan public sentiment.