Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran
Vol 6, No 2 (2022)

Student conceptual and epistemic quality improvement argumenation with scaffolding on argument-driven inquiry

Neni Hasnunidah (University of Lampung)
Herawati Susilo (State University of Malang)
Mimien H. Irawati (State University of Malang)
Hadi Suwono (State University of Malang)

Article Info

Publish Date
06 Nov 2022

Abstract

This study is aimed at comparing the quality of students’ argumentation based on conceptual and epistemic aspects between learnings that implement argument-driven inquiry (ADI) and argument-driven inquiry with scaffolding (ADIS) models. The data were collected through dialogic argumentation observation sheets for the students and audio-visual recordings and were analyzed qualitatively. The study invoved 67 participants in the ADI group and 81 participants in the ADIS group. The quality of student argument with the ADI model differed significantly from the ADIS model. Results show that the students in the ADIS class were are better at providing sufficient data to support claims and coherent causal explanations to explain a certain phenomenon, and at organizing accurate rhetorical references when expressing data.

Copyrights © 2022




Citation Download
RIS
EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite
BibTex
Latex, Jabref
Original Source
Download Original
Google Scholar
Check in Google Scholar
Journal Info
Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran
Website

Abbrev

JK

Publisher

Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Subject

Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education

Description

The journal publishes articles about the research results in the field of education both in the broad sense (general education) or specific (refers to certain fields of ...