<![CDATA[One of these problems is the legal consequence of the transfer of legal issues over the transfer of rights over motorized vehicles to third parties in credit with a fiduciary guarantee in Decision Number: 210/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Tjk in the decision stating that the Plaintiff's claim was granted to state 1. Defendant I (PT Toyota Astra Financial Services), and 2. Defendant II (Woto) has committed an unlawful act which harmed the Plaintiff, namely not being given a Motorized Vehicle Ownership Book (BPKB) for a Toyota Avanza F 52 V M/T 10 Years car 2014. This study aims to determine the legal problems of transferring rights to motorized vehicles to third parties in credit with a fiduciary guarantee in Decision Number: 210/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Tjk are 1. The legal consequences of transferring rights to motorized vehicles to third parties in credit with fiduciary guarantees, 2 . What is the legal process for taking vehicle certificates for motorized vehicles that have been transferred to third parties in credit with fiduciary guarantees.The research method uses qualitative methods using normative and empirical approaches, data collection procedures using literature studies and field observation studies.The results of the study conclude the findings in the results of the legal consequences of the law on the transfer of rights over motorized vehicles to third parties in credit with a fiduciary guarantee in Decision Number: 210/Pdt.G/2020/Pn.Tjk, namely 1. In the Position Case (Punda Mentum Peten' di) transfer of rights to motorized vehicles to third parties in credit with fiduciary guarantees registered on 23 November 2020 at the Registrar's Office of the Tanjungkarang District Court in an e-court manner on 24 November 2020, 2. Basis of Decision (Posita) stated that Defendant I and Defendant II had committed an unlawful act (Onrechmatig Daad) which harmed the plaintiff,]]>
Copyrights © 2023
