cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal)
Contact Email
mej@umm.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
mej@umm.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal)
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
ISSN : 25795260     EISSN : 25795724     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
MEJ (Mathematics Education Journal) is a journal that has a mission to publish the results of research, studies and / or innovation of quality in the field of education and learning from all aspects of mathematics education. To accelerate the transfromasi and implementation of science and technology education and learning to the community.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2" : 10 Documents clear
Effects of Cooperative Learning Model Send Greetings and Problems Type Activity and Results of Learning Kustantini Farah Yogi; Dwi Priyo Utomo; Zuhkrufurrohmah
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.17580

Abstract

This research is an experimental study whose purpose is to determine whether there is an effect of the cooperative learning model type sending greetings and sending questions on the activities and learning outcomes of vocational students' mathematics. The subjects of this study were students of X-KPW 1 and X-KPW 2 of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Malang City in the 2020/2021 academic year as many as 20 people in each class. To collect data about mathematics learning activities, students use observation sheets during learning activities and learning outcomes tests are used to determine students' mastery of learning materials. Then the data obtained were analyzed with a quantitative approach. Based on the MANOVA test, the significance value of activity and learning outcomes is 0.000, which means that H0 is rejected. The conclusion is that the cooperative learning model of sending greetings and questions has a significant influence on student activities and learning outcomes there are differences in the average activity and learning outcomes of students using conventional learning.
Profile of Students' Creative Thinking in Solving Mathematical Problems in terms of Gender Kharisma Isrozia Kusumawardhany; Mega Teguh Budiarto; Raden Sulaiman
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.19765

Abstract

Creative thinking is a person's mental activity related to sensitivity to problems, considering new information and unusual ideas with an open mind, generating alternative answers, and fulfilling the components of fluency, flexibility, and novelty. So far, gender differences have been referred to as one of the factors that affect students' creative thinking skills in solving problems. The purpose of this study was to describe students' creative thinking in solving math problems in terms of gender. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The subjects of this study were 2 junior high school students in grade VII, where one student was male and one female student. The instrument in this study was a test of mathematical ability, problem-solving assignments, and interview guidelines. This study began by determining the research subject using a mathematical ability test then the researcher gave problem-solving tasks and interviews to each subject. The results obtained are a description of the creative thinking of male students and a description of the creative thinking of female students in solving math problems.
Development of Student Learning Programs with a Realistic Mathematic Education (RME) Approach to Improve Students' Critical Thinking Skills Rudy Setiawan; Elita Mega Selvia Wijaya
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.20174

Abstract

This study aims to produce student worksheets with a Realistic Mathematic Education (RME) approach to solving valid, practical, and effective linear program problems. The development of this learning program is based on the Four-D Model adopted from Thiagarajan, Semmel, namely defining(define), design (design), and action (develop). The implementation of the criteria set by conducting validation and field trials. The learning tools developed are in the form of RPP and MFI. The subjects of the development trial were students of the mathematics education study program. Based on the results of data analysis, mathematics learning programs with a Realistic Mathematic Education (RME) approach can be applied and carried out correctly. This is shown from the results of the MFI trial with an average score of  83, which is included in the excellent category. In addition, the test questions test got an average score of 86.8, which also fell into the outstanding category.  From this, it is known that the student learning program is ethical and practical for learning.
Systematic Literature Review: STEM Approach through Engineering Design Process with Project Based Learning Model to Improve Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills Maydilla Fadiarahma Vistara; Rochmad Rochmad; Kritina Wijayanti
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.21150

Abstract

The STEM approach is a learning approach that allows students to think creatively. Creative thinking is included in the skills of the 21st century, especially the 4C ability that students must have to be able to compete globally. This research aims to describe the STEM approach through EDP with the PjBL model and examine the impact of implementing STEM approaches through EDP with the PjBL model on students' creative thinking skills. This research is qualitative research conducted using literature studies. Data collection in this study was carried out by reviewing articles in national and international journals. STEM-EDP implementation with project-based learning can be done in group learning. The results of the study by referring to previous research related to STEM-EDP with project-based learning can be concluded that STEM-based project-based engineering through engineering design processes are able to provide influence to improve students' creative thinking skills.
Model Problem-Based Learning for Improving Student’s Mathematical Competence: Systematic Literature Review M. Azhari Panjaitan; Suhendra Suhendra
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.21462

Abstract

Improving students' mathematical competence such as problem-solving skills, mathematical communication, reasoning, and others can use the Problem Based Learning model. This study aims to analyze the impact of the Problem Based Learning model in improving the mathematical competence of students from primary school, junior high, and senior high school levels. The research method used is Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The sample comprises 17 research results on the PBL model in improving students' mathematical competence (concept understanding, problem-solving, and communication skills). The sample comes from indexed journals from the period 2012-2019. The key research question is how PBL influences students' mathematical competence based on the year of school, level of study, research location, and sample size. The SLR method can find an increase in the number of eight-year studies. The results showed that communication skills and understanding of mathematical concepts dominated research results in improving mathematical abilities through problem-based learning models. Most of the research was conducted at the junior high school level outside Java, with a sample size of 30 people or more. Based on the results of the review, the study’s conclusion proves the influence of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model on students' mathematical competence.
Development of Quizizz Application-Based Assessment to Measure Reasoning Ability of Middle School Students' on Flat Shape Materials Elfrida Rahmasari; Mohammad Syaifuddin; Rizal Dian Azmi
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.22622

Abstract

This research is development research that aims to develop an assessment based on the Quizizz application to measure the reasoning ability of junior high school students' flat wake material. The research subjects were 60 junior high school students. Data sources were obtained from the results of the test and student response questionnaires. The steps for adopting test development using the Djemari Mardapi stage with the following steps: compiling test specifications, writing tests, reviewing tests, conducting test trials, analyzing test items, refining tests, assembling tests, administering tests, and interpreting test results. The results showed that the Quiziz application-based assessment was valid, reliable, practical, and effective. The test has a characteristic difficulty level, namely two easy category questions and eight medium category questions, and the distinguishing power of 8 very good questions and two good questions. The reasoning ability of students' flat shapes, as measured by an assessment based on the Quizizz application, has an average of 67.83, with a fairly good category.
Literature Review Using Think Talk Write (TTW) Cooperative Learning Model in Students' Mathematical Reasoning Ability Evi Widianingrum; Dewi Netta Febrianti; Savitri Wanabuliandari
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.22678

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze Think Talk Write (TTW) learning whether this model is effective in improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities. This type of research is a literature review related to the theory of the Think Talk Write (TTW) type cooperative learning model and mathematical reasoning abilities. This research uses library materials as the main data source that discusses the effectiveness of using cooperative learning models to improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities. The selection of sources from the literature review is chosen according to the development of the journal for the last 5 years, namely 2018 to 2022. Reasoning ability is the ability to draw conclusions or make new statements based on previous statements. For cooperative learning model type Think Talk Write (TTW) is an activity to think about reading material by listening, criticizing, and providing solutions. The results of this study indicate that increasing mathematical reasoning ability is more effective using Think Talk Write (TTW) compared to conventional learning, because the use of Think Talk Write (TTW) type learning model will make students understand the material better because they learn from thinking, compiling, testing. , reflect, and write down ideas.
Mathematics Literature Analysis of Students of Class VIII MTs Darussalam Daun in Cooperative Learning Model Type Investigation Group Zuhro Putri Firdausi; Marhan Taufik; Reni Dwi Susanti
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.22680

Abstract

This study aims to determine the extent of mathematical literacy skills by applying the Group Investigation type of cooperative learning model. Mathematics literacy achievement in Indonesia is still low, as seen in the PISA and TIMSS surveys, and one of the private junior high schools in Malang learning mathematics is still using conventional learning. The research method is qualitative research with a descriptive approach with nine students as the subject. The results showed that observations of teacher activities at the first meeting were 91.6% very good and the second meeting 97% very good too, observation of student activities at the first meeting 87.5% was very good and the second meeting 93.8% with very good predicates. Then the data from the student response questionnaire on the application of the GI model is an average of 4, 1, which has a good predicate. In addition, the results of the essay test to measure students' literacy skills in the application of the GI model for two meetings showed poor results at the first meeting because there were 2 students who had moderate percentage predicate, while the mathematical literacy ability of students in the second meeting was better because 7 out of 9 students with very high predicate and others with a high predicate. The data obtained based on the results of observations of teacher and student activities, student response questionnaires, and essay test results indicate that the mathematical literacy of Class VIII MTs Darussalam Daun students in the application of the Group Investigation type cooperative model has been successful and effective so that students' mathematical literacy skills are better than meeting First because most students get a very high predicate.
Analysis of the Visual to Verbal Mathematical Representation Process for Junior High School Students in Solving HOTS Questions in terms of Adversity Quotient Muchammad Islam Fudin; Hendarto Cahyono; Octavina Rizky Utami Putri
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.23047

Abstract

Representation is a tool to solve a problem in the form of interpretation of what students think of a problem in the form of visual, verbal, and algebraic or symbolic representations. Solving non-routine problems in mathematics learning requires high order thinking skills (HOTS). Solving student problems, both routine and non-routine problems can be influenced by the ability of students to process existing problems into a challenge that must be passed, which is called Adversity Quotient. The purpose of this study was to describe the process of visual to verbal mathematical representation of junior high school students in solving HOTS questions in terms of the adversity quotient. The research uses a qualitative approach, the type of research used in this research is descriptive qualitative research. The data obtained in the form of written test results data, questionnaire results data and interview data will be submitted in written or oral form in narrative form. The instruments used are in the form of tests and questionnaires. The result show that the subject representation process with the adversity quotient level for the climber category has met the representation process indicators well in the three HOTS questions that were worked on. Subjects with the adversity quotient level in the camper category have not been able to meet the indicators of the representation process in the HOTS problem of creating.
Analysis of Students' Reasoning Ability in Solving Non-Routine Math Problems in terms of Learning Style Widya Rizky Zakinah; Siti Inganah; Minatun Nadlifah
Mathematics Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/mej.v6i2.23048

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe students' mathematical reasoning abilities in solving non-routine problems in terms of learning styles. The type of research used is descriptive with qualitative data. The research subjects were students of class XI IPA. The instruments used are questionnaires, non-routine test questions, and interviews. The data to be taken are data on questionnaires, test questions, and interviews. The data obtained will then be analyzed in a descriptive-qualitative way. The results of this study are that 11th-grade students of MA Muhammadiyah 1 Plus Malang, have several learning styles, namely: visual, kinesthetic, and auditory, respectively: 67%️, 25%️, and 8%. Students with visual learning styles have fairly high reasoning abilities by meeting indicators such as 1) being able to present and make mathematical statements in writing well 2) being able to manipulate y-values, and 3) compiling solutions to existing problems. While students with kinesthetic learning styles, students meet reasoning ability indicators, including 1) writing mathematical statements well, and 2) manipulating target functions, then students with auditory learning styles only have one indicator of reasoning ability, namely: 1) creating and finding solutions to trouble well.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): MEJ Vol 7 No.2 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): MEJ Vol 7 No.1 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.2 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): MEJ Vol 6 No.1 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): MEJ Vol 5 No.2 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020) Vol 4, No 1 (2020) Vol 3, No 2 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019) Vol 3, No 1 (2019) Vol 3, No 1 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019) Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2017) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2017) More Issue