Mulawarman Law Review
Mulawarman Law Review (MULREV) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University. MULREV published twice a year in June and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, State and Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Adat Law and Local Custom, Natural Resources and Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law. ISSN: 2527-3485 | e-ISSN: 2527-3477
Articles
10 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018"
:
10 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Justice Constitutionality of Specialized Court in Coping with the Dispute on Direct Local Leader Election Result ]]>
<![CDATA[Ebin Marwi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1174.94 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.43
<![CDATA[In accordance with the petition of Constitutional Court Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolves disputes on direct Local Leader Election result, because provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2018 Republic of Indonesia against the constitution of 1945 Article 157 paragraph (1) Law Number 8 Year 2018 determines that the dispute settlement on direct Local Leader Election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct Local Leader Election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constituional authority to fulfill temporary vacuum of norm (rechtvakum). Therefore Legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct Local Leader Election result.]]>
<![CDATA[Normative Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Gabriel Theofany]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (502.59 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.53
<![CDATA[It is undeniable that the flow of globalization plays a major role in every aspect of state life, including the field of law and the legal product itself. Indonesia as a WTO member is obliged to ratify various types of international agreements to be made into domestic law products in the form of the Law. One of the important issues that must be protected is Intellectual Property Rights which is compiled based on the TRIPs standard. In its development, the concepts and characteristics of IPR have caused losses to developing countries such as Indonesia which have many assets in the form of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions held by local communities. The IPR legal regime cannot accommodate the protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions as a whole. The direction of legal regulation that protects traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions today is to form a new legal product that is specifically outside the IPR regime. The Bill on Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions has long been composed by Indonesia since 2008 and included in the 2009-2014 National Legislation Program. But even until now there has been no approval made by the government. The normatification of this bill is very important to be done so that it can be given that traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions can be used as an aid for advancing the nation's economy. By using normative legal research methods and qualitative approaches, this study concludes that the IPR legal regime in Indonesia has not been able to provide maximum protection to traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. Therefore, it is very important to discuss and ratify the Bill on Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions to become products law to guarantee protection and provide economic benefits to the State and society.]]>
<![CDATA[Konstruksi Hukum Diversi Pada Tahap Pelaksanaan Peradilan Anak ]]>
<![CDATA[Sumiati]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhamad Muhdar]]>;
<![CDATA[Ivan Zairani Lisi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (457.272 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.85
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini membahas konsekuensi hukum dalam proses peradilan bilamana penerapan diversi tidak dilakukan pada tingkat penyidikan, dan proses yang meniadakan penerapan diversi mempengaruhi perlindungan kepentingan hukum bagi pelaku tindak pidana. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah social legal research dengan membangun variable sebagai dasar pengukuran isu hukum yang dibangun. Dalam pendekatan ini, variabel mengenai perdebatan dalam kerangka teori, perdebatan pada tingkat relasi antar norma dan perdebatan pada tingkat kepentingan korban dalam proses penerapan diversi. Konsekuensi hukum dalam proses peradilan anak bilamana penerapan diversi tidak dilakukan pada tingkat penyidikan bahwa tidak ada konsekuensi hukum bagi penyidik yang tidak melakukan upaya diversi pada saat proses pemeriksaan perkara yang dilakukan karena secara normatif tidak ada ketentuan yang dilanggar selama proses penyidikan. Peniadaan penerapan diversi bagi pelaku tindak pidana khususnya untuk anak tentunya tidak memberikan rasa keadilan bagi anak, dikarenakan hak-hak anak yang dijamin oleh undang-undang tidak terpenuhi.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Protection of Go-Jek Driver That Experiences Damages Due To The Fictive Order In Go-Food Menu In Go-Jek Aplication ]]>
<![CDATA[Aditya Hermawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Erna Susanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Syukri Hidayatullah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (441.482 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.117
<![CDATA[This research is proposed to answer two questions: Firstly, to find out the cause of fictitious orders experienced by Go-Jek drivers in the Go-food menu in Go-Jek app. Secondly, to know the legal protection of Go-Jek drivers who suffered losses due to a fictitious plane in the Go-food menu on the Go-Jek app. And the research is directed to educate the public the importance of Civil law which governs agreement in the life of society. This study uses socio-legal approach with a number of resource persons. The choice of approach to socio-legal does not mean disregarding doctrinal side support on the grounds that one of the aims of this study sees a set of positive norms in relation to Legal protection of Go-Jek drivers, including legal theory support with a view to verifying the implementation of law in practice (protection and responsible). This study concludes that, Transactions using Go-Jek access has so far caused legal consequences among others who is responsible for the losses experienced by drivers, whether the Go-Jek party is responsible for the losses experienced drivers, including what kind of legal protection obtained by the driver when suffering application losses by irresponsible consumers. The factors of the emergence of fictitious orders are the existence of competitions between the Go-Jek driver, Go-Jek verification system is still weak, and the existence of bad faith in someone. Partnership agreement between PT. Go-Jek and Go-Jek’s driver is a standard clause that created and provided without involving the Go-Jek drivers in which there is a clause of transfer of responsibility because of PT. Go-Jek as the Go-Jek application service manager will not be responsible if there is a loss caused by the use of Go-Jek application. The legal relations and responsibilities of the parties should be clearly stipulated in the partnership agreement between PT. Go-Jek Indonesia, and Partners are created based on mutual agreement and agreement between both parties. To minimize the losses experienced by Go-Jek drivers in service delivery for every use of consumer spending service must have a Go-Pay account, which expenditures can not be executed if the balance in the Go-Pay account is insufficient to make an expense transaction.]]>
<![CDATA[The Contradiction of Between Judge’s Decision and Legal Provisions Regarding The Position of Heirs in Proof of Land Rights ]]>
<![CDATA[Sulistiani Adont]]>;
<![CDATA[La Syarifuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahmawati Al Hidayah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (489.367 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.118
<![CDATA[As the economic development of Indonesian society increases, so will the need for legal certainty in the field of land for the right holder of a plot of land. the fundamental issue in verifying the right to the land is any person claiming to have a right, or appointing an event to affirm his right or to deny any right of another person, shall prove the existence of that right or prove the event, the heirs' a case study of the Samarinda District Court Judgment Number 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr.This research uses normative research method. The primary legal material of this research is the legislation that is compiled into a conceptual form based on existing legislation. Which then conducted legal analysis of the problems in this study.The result of the research is the position of the heirs in verification of the right to land must have at least two evidences, that can prove that the heirs are valid first through the certificate of inheritance. To strengthen the verification of the heirs to the land rights, the heirs must prove by means of evidence as set forth in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Registration. The second result of the research is the letter of appointment by the Government/Local Government is a valid evidence based on existing legislation, and it becomes the base of the right which is the basis of the land ownership, the analysis of the judge's decision namely the judge decision of Samarinda District Court No. 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr is incorrect and does not provide legal certainty, it is caused by no reference what is contained in Article 24 paragraph (1) and Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.]]>
<![CDATA[Justice Constitutionality of Specialized Court in Coping with the Dispute on Direct Local Leader Election Result ]]>
<![CDATA[Ebin Marwi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.43
<![CDATA[In accordance with the petition of Constitutional Court Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolves disputes on direct Local Leader Election result, because provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2018 Republic of Indonesia against the constitution of 1945 Article 157 paragraph (1) Law Number 8 Year 2018 determines that the dispute settlement on direct Local Leader Election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct Local Leader Election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constituional authority to fulfill temporary vacuum of norm (rechtvakum). Therefore Legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct Local Leader Election result.]]>
<![CDATA[Normative Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Gabriel Theofany]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.53
<![CDATA[It is undeniable that the flow of globalization plays a major role in every aspect of state life, including the field of law and the legal product itself. Indonesia as a WTO member is obliged to ratify various types of international agreements to be made into domestic law products in the form of the Law. One of the important issues that must be protected is Intellectual Property Rights which is compiled based on the TRIPs standard. In its development, the concepts and characteristics of IPR have caused losses to developing countries such as Indonesia which have many assets in the form of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions held by local communities. The IPR legal regime cannot accommodate the protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions as a whole. The direction of legal regulation that protects traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions today is to form a new legal product that is specifically outside the IPR regime. The Bill on Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions has long been composed by Indonesia since 2008 and included in the 2009-2014 National Legislation Program. But even until now there has been no approval made by the government. The normatification of this bill is very important to be done so that it can be given that traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions can be used as an aid for advancing the nation's economy. By using normative legal research methods and qualitative approaches, this study concludes that the IPR legal regime in Indonesia has not been able to provide maximum protection to traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. Therefore, it is very important to discuss and ratify the Bill on Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions to become products law to guarantee protection and provide economic benefits to the State and society.]]>
<![CDATA[Konstruksi Hukum Diversi Pada Tahap Pelaksanaan Peradilan Anak ]]>
<![CDATA[Sumiati]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhamad Muhdar]]>;
<![CDATA[Ivan Zairani Lisi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.85
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini membahas konsekuensi hukum dalam proses peradilan bilamana penerapan diversi tidak dilakukan pada tingkat penyidikan, dan proses yang meniadakan penerapan diversi mempengaruhi perlindungan kepentingan hukum bagi pelaku tindak pidana. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah social legal research dengan membangun variable sebagai dasar pengukuran isu hukum yang dibangun. Dalam pendekatan ini, variabel mengenai perdebatan dalam kerangka teori, perdebatan pada tingkat relasi antar norma dan perdebatan pada tingkat kepentingan korban dalam proses penerapan diversi. Konsekuensi hukum dalam proses peradilan anak bilamana penerapan diversi tidak dilakukan pada tingkat penyidikan bahwa tidak ada konsekuensi hukum bagi penyidik yang tidak melakukan upaya diversi pada saat proses pemeriksaan perkara yang dilakukan karena secara normatif tidak ada ketentuan yang dilanggar selama proses penyidikan. Peniadaan penerapan diversi bagi pelaku tindak pidana khususnya untuk anak tentunya tidak memberikan rasa keadilan bagi anak, dikarenakan hak-hak anak yang dijamin oleh undang-undang tidak terpenuhi.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Protection of Go-Jek Driver That Experiences Damages Due To The Fictive Order In Go-Food Menu In Go-Jek Aplication ]]>
<![CDATA[Aditya Hermawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Erna Susanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Syukri Hidayatullah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.117
<![CDATA[This research is proposed to answer two questions: Firstly, to find out the cause of fictitious orders experienced by Go-Jek drivers in the Go-food menu in Go-Jek app. Secondly, to know the legal protection of Go-Jek drivers who suffered losses due to a fictitious plane in the Go-food menu on the Go-Jek app. And the research is directed to educate the public the importance of Civil law which governs agreement in the life of society. This study uses socio-legal approach with a number of resource persons. The choice of approach to socio-legal does not mean disregarding doctrinal side support on the grounds that one of the aims of this study sees a set of positive norms in relation to Legal protection of Go-Jek drivers, including legal theory support with a view to verifying the implementation of law in practice (protection and responsible). This study concludes that, Transactions using Go-Jek access has so far caused legal consequences among others who is responsible for the losses experienced by drivers, whether the Go-Jek party is responsible for the losses experienced drivers, including what kind of legal protection obtained by the driver when suffering application losses by irresponsible consumers. The factors of the emergence of fictitious orders are the existence of competitions between the Go-Jek driver, Go-Jek verification system is still weak, and the existence of bad faith in someone. Partnership agreement between PT. Go-Jek and Go-Jek’s driver is a standard clause that created and provided without involving the Go-Jek drivers in which there is a clause of transfer of responsibility because of PT. Go-Jek as the Go-Jek application service manager will not be responsible if there is a loss caused by the use of Go-Jek application. The legal relations and responsibilities of the parties should be clearly stipulated in the partnership agreement between PT. Go-Jek Indonesia, and Partners are created based on mutual agreement and agreement between both parties. To minimize the losses experienced by Go-Jek drivers in service delivery for every use of consumer spending service must have a Go-Pay account, which expenditures can not be executed if the balance in the Go-Pay account is insufficient to make an expense transaction.]]>
<![CDATA[The Contradiction of Between Judge’s Decision and Legal Provisions Regarding The Position of Heirs in Proof of Land Rights ]]>
<![CDATA[Sulistiani Adont]]>;
<![CDATA[La Syarifuddin]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahmawati Al Hidayah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.118
<![CDATA[As the economic development of Indonesian society increases, so will the need for legal certainty in the field of land for the right holder of a plot of land. the fundamental issue in verifying the right to the land is any person claiming to have a right, or appointing an event to affirm his right or to deny any right of another person, shall prove the existence of that right or prove the event, the heirs' a case study of the Samarinda District Court Judgment Number 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr.This research uses normative research method. The primary legal material of this research is the legislation that is compiled into a conceptual form based on existing legislation. Which then conducted legal analysis of the problems in this study.The result of the research is the position of the heirs in verification of the right to land must have at least two evidences, that can prove that the heirs are valid first through the certificate of inheritance. To strengthen the verification of the heirs to the land rights, the heirs must prove by means of evidence as set forth in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Registration. The second result of the research is the letter of appointment by the Government/Local Government is a valid evidence based on existing legislation, and it becomes the base of the right which is the basis of the land ownership, the analysis of the judge's decision namely the judge decision of Samarinda District Court No. 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr is incorrect and does not provide legal certainty, it is caused by no reference what is contained in Article 24 paragraph (1) and Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.]]>
