cover
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 8 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 9, No 3 (2012)" : 8 Documents clear
Hak Menguasai Negara Atas Mineral dan Batubara Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Minerba Victor Imanuel Williamson Nalle
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (672.453 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk933

Abstract

Mineral and coal is one of Indonesia’s natural resource potential. Natural resources can bring prosperity for the people of Indonesia. Therefore we need a pro-mining policies of national economic interests. The experience of Indonesia during the New Order show the mining policy in favor of the interests of foreign capital through the mechanism of the work contract that puts the state as the inferior party. State’s right to control the mineral and coal mining policy does not appear in the New Order. Since the enactment of Law Number 4 of 2009, it seemed right to control the state through the licensing system. Besides the role of national capital in the mining sector also raised through divestment mechanism.
Politik Hukum di Bidang Ekonomi dan Pelembagaan Konsepsi Welfare State di dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Kukuh Fadli Prasetyo
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (509.376 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk934

Abstract

Welfare state conception has been adopted in the substance of the 1945 Constitution of Republic Indonesia (UUD 1945), that extracted in fourth paragraph of Preambule of UUD  1945,  by  posting  the  phrase  ‘to  improve  public  welfare’  as staatsidee of Republic of Indonesia. In amendment of UUD 1945, UUD 1945 determines economic democracy principles, as prescribed in Article 33 paragraph (4) UUD 1945. In its economic democracy, there is efficiency with justice principle that recognized as capitalistic unsure which lifts the spirit of neoliberalism. After analysing that corelation, I found and identify that some unsures of neoliberalism has been emulted in some legal policy in economic issued by the Administration of Indonesia, such as privatisation, market regulation, deregulation, and reducing public spending.
Konstitusionalitas Penerapan Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Elwi Danil
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (503.489 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk938

Abstract

Indonesia is a plural country with a lot of diversities in it. As a country that embracing positivistic in law perspective, Indonesia is applying the codification of law that has most popular maxim: the certainty of law. That maxim can reduce traditional law that believed by indigenous people. This paper talks about possibility of criminal law in traditional law perspective in Indonesian plural culture.
Rekonstruksi Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensiil Berdasar Undang- Undang Dasar 1945 Menuju Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensiil Murni Sulardi Sulardi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (429.485 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk935

Abstract

Indonesian governmental system is conducted based on 1945 Constitution. When varied constitutions were implemented in Indonesia in the past, the consequence     is there were varied political systems. In 1999-2002, there were changes in 1945 Constitution. One of the objectives is to strengthen presidential system of government. It was expected that the amended Constitution could become the foundation of the good, effective, and efficient presidential system of government. In fact, the amended Constitution does not yet specified the characteristics of the presidential system of government, so there is awareness that a reconstruction into the presidential system of government is needed. Since 1945 independence until transition period, presidential system of government based on 1945 Constitution was conducted inconsistently because 1945 Constitution was arbitrarily interpreted by the presidents in their terms of office. Theoretically, there was a new concept on the presidential system   of government, that is the pure presidential system of government. Practically, if   the concept is included in 1945 Constitution, the consequence is that the president has relatively equal position among others state institutions. Then, the presidential system of government can effectively and efficiently run because each of state institutions, especially President and Parliament, can focus their attention to their tasks and duties.
Komparasi Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu di Beberapa Negara Penganut Paham Demokrasi Konstitusional Bisariyadi Bisariyadi; Anna Triningsih; Meyrinda Rahmawaty H; Alia Harumdani W
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (694.982 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk936

Abstract

Every country in the world, moreover in every country which has implemented the way of life of democcratic and nation, presume that election is one of the important element as a marker of democracy of the country and also has a practical function of government political as a succession’s tool between the government parties and the oposition parties. In every democratic constitutional state, the election process has  a purpose to embody will of the people into pattern of power without violence.The election process will not only be assessed by sticking to the existing legal framework but the laws, codes of conduct of the election and its implementation needs to be tested and adjusted if it is in accordance with its primary purpose  or not without ignoring  the  rights  of  individuals  or  people.  In  the  process  of  the general election, the election process does not always run smoothly. Various obstacles in the implementation of good elections that occurred both during and previous election, is a  problem  that  certainly  would  have  widely  spread  impact if not immediately resolved. The existence of problems in the election related to dissatisfaction of decision of the election or criminal violations and administrative which can influence the result of election is commonly known by electoral disputes. In order the election dispute does not disturb the constitutional system or system of government of a country or region, it requires an electoral dispute resolution mechanisms that effective and can give a fair decision to the parties.The main problem is how the benchmark of an electoral dispute resolution mechanisms that are effective? Because, if traced further and reflect on democracies country in the world, not all democracies country, especially the democracies country which basing on the supremacy of the constitution, has the same electoral dispute resolution mechanisms between one country to another country. This is very important, because by knowing the measure or the benchmark of the effectiveness of an electoral dispute resolution mechanisms, we can consider to choose which electoral dispute resolution mechanisms that appropriate and give the fairness to the parties and society in general.
Konsep Negara Berbasis Hak sebagai Argumen Justifikasi Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-undang Titon Slamet Kurnia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (516.032 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk937

Abstract

This article argues that the concept of right-based State and right-based constitution are substantively the basis or justification for constitutional review of legislation or laws. The constitutionality of laws is determined by the idea that human rights are supreme or superior over the legislature and its legal product. Therefore, the legislature should respect human rights in law-making. This article also rejects the view that hierarchy of laws is the only basis for constitutional review of legislation or laws because this view only explains it formally. This argument cannot be applied to Britain or Israel which does not have a formal constitution.
Memaknai Kecenderungan Penyelesaian Konflik Batas Wilayah Ke Mahkamah Konstitusi Fajar Laksono Soeroso
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (523.817 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk931

Abstract

The trend of border conflict resolution to the Constitutional Court is interesting to analyzed. This analysis founded three interesting things that the Supreme Court decision did not resolve the problem but it raises a new problem, the precedent decision of the Constitutional Court may cancelling the Supreme Court decision, and the trial process in Constitutional Court felt more fair and openess. From its trend emerging of new legal loophole, which the parties became adressat Supreme Court decision not run a Supreme Court decision. This legal loophole seemed to justify    the unlawful acts because the Supreme Court decision has binding and should be implemented.This trend is not a question of rivalry between the Supreme Court    and Constitutional Court, but rather about how the judiciary presents a reliable judicial process and is believed by the justice seekers so that decisions can resolve the problem and  implemented.
Ideologi Welfare State dalam Dasar Negara Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional Alfitri Alfitri
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (547.267 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk932

Abstract

Are the objective of Indonesia “promoting the general welfare”, and the fifth principle of Pancasila “social justice for all people of Indonesia”, as well as the constitutional mandate to hold a social security system must be expressed in terms of the state positions itself to be responsible for ensuring a decent standard of living for all citizens? This paper will analyze whether the interpretation of welfare state ideology of the government in the Act No. 40/2004 on National Social Security System had violated the 1945 Constitution. This paper supports the argument of   the Constitutional Court holding that social insurance programs adopted by the government meet the constitutional criteria. The existence of the constitutional criteria makesthe welfare state ideology of Indonesia open to interpretation, and this argument is more appropriate to the context and realistic about the ability of Indonesia to provide social security for its citizens.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8