cover
Contact Name
Otto Fajarianto
Contact Email
ofajarianto@gmail.com
Phone
+6281296890687
Journal Mail Official
ofajarianto@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Golden Plaza (D'Best) Blok E -16 Jl. RS. Fatmawati No. 15, Jakarta Selatan 12420
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2715498X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v3i3
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on all aspects of LAW, POLICY REVIEW and SOCIAL SCIENCES. Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) welcomes submissions of the following article types: (1) Papers: reports of high-quality original research with conclusions representing a significant advance, novelty or new finding in the field; (2) Topical Reviews: written by leading researchers in their fields, these articles present the background to and overview of a particular field, and the current state of the art. Topical Reviews are normally invited by the Editorial Board; (3) Comments: comment or criticism on work previously published in the journal. These are usually published with an associated Reply. Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) publishes three (February, June, October) issues per year, published by IPEST, International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial and Teknologi. Article must publish in English.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 14 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 4 No 3 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2023" : 14 Documents clear
SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES BETWEEN ELECTRICITY CONSUMER CUSTOMERS AND PLN IN PAYMENT OF ELECTRICITY BILL FINES Kemas Abdul Gaffur; Anwar Budiman; Abdul Chair Ramadhan
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 4 No 3 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v4i3.151

Abstract

This study aims to determine the validity of the Decree of the Board of Directors of PLN Number 1486.K/Dir/2011, dated December 27, 2011, concerning the Ordering of Electricity Usage (P2TL), both according to positive law and based on the dogmatics of legal science. Normative legal research focuses on solving legal problems through unique mechanisms, examining the law as a system of rules. This research does not conduct field research and is understood as a science of rules, focusing on dogmatics and legal systems. Existing research data is collected through literature studies, including literature materials in the form of primary materials or sources. The result of the case between Pioneer Chemical and PT PLN (Persero) Distribution of Greater Jakarta and Tangerang Area Cengkareng revolves around the Decree of the Board of Directors of PT PLN (Persero) No. 1486.K/Dir/2011, which states that the calculation of supplementary bills and the proposal for P2TL settlement are based on administrative and/or laboratory examinations. The Panel of Judges decided that the calculation of supplementary bills did not need to be guided by laboratory results, and the Defendant had the authority to conduct P2TL as outlined in the Decree. The decree met the criteria of legitimacy, interpretation, sanction, and jurisdiction in the legal system approach. Pioneer Chemical, as the plaintiff, was unable to submit evidence of unlawful acts committed by PT PLN (Persero) Distribution of Greater Jakarta and Tangerang Area Cengkareng.
PKPU AS AN INSTITUTION THAT ATTEMPTS RESTRUCTURING TO PREVENT BANKRUPTCY Rotua Sri Damayanti; Sardjana Orba Manullang; Retno Kus Setyowati
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 4 No 3 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v4i3.152

Abstract

This study aims to analyze PKPU in implementing debt restructuring in Decision No. 718/K/ Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019. jo. No. 4/ Pdt.Sus.Pembatalan Perdamaian/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. jo. No. 23/PKPU/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst regarding the judge's consideration in terms of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU. The research method used is a qualitative method using data collection techniques in the form of literature studies. This research is studied based on Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy by combining the theory of justice as a Grand Theory. The results of this research are in the form of Judex Jurist considerations that grant the petition of the Applicant for the cancellation of the peace agreement that has been homologated based on Decision No. 23/PKPU/2011/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst because the peace agreement dated November 1, 2011, which was homologated by the court, is a decision that is final and legally binding, so it cannot be changed for any reason, let alone changes made outside the court. As well as the PKPU Applicant, PT. Arpeni Pratama Ocean Line, Tbk. has admitted everything argued by the Bankruptcy Applicant, PT. Bank CIMB Niaga, Tbk. especially regarding all substantial requirements of the PKPU Applicant.
Juridical Review of Hospitals Without Supervisory Boards Based on Laws and Regulations Emirlad Isfihan; Ninis Nugraheni; asmuni
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 4 No 3 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v4i3.153

Abstract

Hospitals in improving service quality must have autonomy, hospitals are one form of public service reform so that public services can improve. Therefore, in an effort to improve hospital performance, it is necessary to provide guidance and supervision through the establishment of a Supervisory Board. The purpose of this study is to analyse the urgency of establishing a hospital supervisory board and the legal consequences for hospitals that do not have a supervisory board by using normative research methods and using statutory and conceptual approaches. In accordance with statutory provisions, hospitals that do not have a supervisory board do not violate statutory provisions as long as they do not fulfil the criteria required to form a supervisory board. However, legal protection of patients for hospitals that do not have a supervisory board must be guaranteed by the government through supervisory efforts by external supervisors and other stakeholders.
Equitable Law Enforcement Against Law Enforcement Officers in Criminal Acts of Corruption Andi Apriyanto; Siswantari Pratiwi; Parbuntian Sinaga
Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 4 No 3 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v4i3.179

Abstract

The pattern of eradicating corruption by punishing perpetrators with severe criminal sanctions and even up to the death penalty must be upheld to prevent acts of corruption. However, in practice, the criminal sanctions given by court judges to perpetrators are still light, even when the perpetrators are law enforcement officials such as the Prosecutor General's Office. The problem is how to consider the judges of the DKI Jakarta High Court Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT.Dki and the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 11/Pid.B/TPK/2008/PN.Jkt.Pst in imposing criminal sanctions by Prosecutor Pinangki and Prosecutor Urip Tri Gunawan? The research method used is normative juridical research using secondary data. The results of the study stated that the consideration of the DKI Jakarta High Court Judge Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT.Dki and the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 11/Pid.B/TPK/2008/PN.Jkt.Pst in imposing criminal sanctions that were carried out by Prosecutor Pinangki and Prosecutor Urip Tri Gunawan was based on mitigating and aggravating matters which led to disparities. This is caused by structural factors, substance factors, and cultural factors.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14