cover
Contact Name
Aly Rasyid
Contact Email
aly.rasyid@dsn.ubharajaya.ac.id
Phone
+628111085034
Journal Mail Official
aly.rasyid@dsn.ubharajaya.ac.id
Editorial Address
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya Kampus II: Jalan Raya Perjuangan No. 81, Bekasi Utara, Kota Bekasi 17121, Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Bhara Petro Energi
ISSN : 28285530     EISSN : 28283457     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31599/bpe.v1i2
Journal of Bhara Petro Energi (BPE) is a scientific journal managed and published by the Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bhayangkara University, Greater Jakarta. The focus of this journal is all about the upstream and downstream oil and gas industry as well as the geothermal industry. This journal focuses on production technology, drilling technology, petrophysics, reservoir studies and EOR (enhanced oil recovery) studies. Downstream Technology focuses on oil processing, managing surface equipment, and economic forecasting. BPE will be issued 3 (three) times a year, in March, July and December. First published in March 2022 with ISSN 2828-3457 (Online Media), and ISSN 2828-5530 (print media).
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 1 No 1: Volume 1 Nomor 1 (Maret 2022)" : 6 Documents clear
Evaluasi dan Optimasi Desain Casing Sumur Pemboran dengan Metode Maximum Load di Sumur ENN-1 di Lapangan Batuwangi Aly Rasyid; Edy Soesanto; Ezrawati Nunut Nababan
JURNAL BHARA PETRO ENERGI Vol 1 No 1: Volume 1 Nomor 1 (Maret 2022)
Publisher : Department of Petroleum Engineering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1149.732 KB) | DOI: 10.31599/bpe.v1i1.1005

Abstract

Batuwangi is field that positioned ini the Sumatera at southeastern part. Batuwangi is in the development stage. The ENN-1 is one of well at Batuwangi field, placed at the geographical coordinates 5˚25'21.24063 South Latitude and 106˚18'55.73957 East Longitude. ENN-1 is drilled as a directional well spud on December 9, 2014 and completed on February 6, 2015. ENN-1 well has a TD (total depth) of 3804 ftMD and 3247 SSTVD, as an oil producer. In this paper, it will be studied the planning of casing utilized in the ENN-1 well, to see whether the desain of casing is already the most technically choice or not, to do calibration evaluation the grade casing used in ENN- 1 Well. To perform evaluation, the Maximum Load method will be used, the case will be choosen against desain factors of burst, collapse, and tension load resistant of casing. Based on the evaluation of the study, it is found that casing grade in the ENN-1 Well is exceeds the technical requirement. That fact, need to be corrected since it will lead to cost inefficient, it will much more expensive, since the casing purchased is higher than technical requirement. Therefore, in this studied offer the casing grade proposal to be utilized in the ENN-1 well which meet with technical requirement as well as economically much more efficient than current design.
Desain Formulasi Lumpur Untuk Pemboran Panas Bumi Di Sumur GG-01 M. Mahlil Nasution; Aly Rasyid; Gigin Pahrudin
JURNAL BHARA PETRO ENERGI Vol 1 No 1: Volume 1 Nomor 1 (Maret 2022)
Publisher : Department of Petroleum Engineering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (586.773 KB) | DOI: 10.31599/bpe.v1i1.1006

Abstract

During the drilling process, we need to look at several aspects that need to be considered, including the drilling mud aspect which is one of the important aspects in a safe and efficient drilling process.The success of a drilling process through various rock layers is very dependent on the design of the drilling mud formulation. All of that can be influenced by the nature and physics of the drilling mud which needs to be adjusted to the formation conditions, formation pressure, rock type and fluid content contained in the formation. In designing the mud formulation that will be used, it can be done by using the mud system correlation method or by analyzing the pressure wells that become offset wells or key wells which are analyzed to determine the properties of the mud to be used. Well GG – 01 is an exploration well so it does not have an offset well. The drilling that will be penetrated is as many as 4 routes which in the first route the hole is made using a mash system so that it does not use drilling mud. And for the next route, the type of mud to be used is KCL Polymer with a different percentage on each route.
Perbandingan Pemilihan Antara Tipe Wellhead Conventional Dengan Wellhead Unihead Nugroho Marsiyanto; Aly Rasyid; Sigit Widianto
JURNAL BHARA PETRO ENERGI Vol 1 No 1: Volume 1 Nomor 1 (Maret 2022)
Publisher : Department of Petroleum Engineering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (600.908 KB) | DOI: 10.31599/bpe.v1i1.1007

Abstract

The wellhead is a surface well control device made of steel which forms a seal / baffle system to withstand bursts or leaks of liquid from the well to the surface composed of casing head (casing hanger) and tubing head (tubing hanger). Wellhead used in an oil or gas well must have a long runlife because an oil or gas well can last up to decades, and if it is necessary to replace the wellhead will take large costs. This paper determines the process in selecting the use and effectiveness of wellhead and comparing conventional wellhead versus unihead wellhead at W well that is efficient and safe during drilling well and optimal utilization during production process. Wellhead type selection process cover determining temperature class, material class, pressure rating, installation costs, and in terms of safety. Based on the selection process, W wellhead well has the temperature class used is class U, the material class used is the type FF-0.5 or HH-0.5, for a pressure rating of 3000 psi, and in terms of cost it is more economical to use unihead wellhead type.
Identifikasi Data Reservoir Dengan Menggunakan Pemodelan Software RFD Untuk Mengetahui Production Forecast Rate Di Sumur J Lapangan A Edy Soesanto; Eko Prastio; Jessica Abidin
JURNAL BHARA PETRO ENERGI Vol 1 No 1: Volume 1 Nomor 1 (Maret 2022)
Publisher : Department of Petroleum Engineering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (378.167 KB) | DOI: 10.31599/bpe.v1i1.1008

Abstract

Reservoir simulation is a process of mathematically modeling reservoir conditions by integrating various existing data (geology, geophysics, petrophysics, reservoirs, etc) to obtain reservoir performance in well conditions so that the purpose of reservoir simulation is to determine the current and future reservoir performance to estimate the rate of oil production (production forecast rate). Rapid technological developments encourage experts to create computer software that is used as a simulation tool. The method in this study uses reservoir modeling simulation software. The production forecast rate in this reservoir model is carried out for 2 years by only adding one production well in the reservoir area that has not been drained, namely infill well A. This shows that the oil production rate continues to decrease but increases the cumulative oil production. The cumulative oil production produced by well A was 33,80 STB in 2014 with an average increase of 12%. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the reservoir model after 2014 in detail the value of the data again so that the reservoir simulation process for the next forecast gets good oil production results.
Evaluasi Water Shut Off Dan Membuka Lapisan Baru Sumur Bagong Di Lapangan Lesma Abdullah Rizky Agusman; Aly Rasyid; Dika Latief Lesmana
JURNAL BHARA PETRO ENERGI Vol 1 No 1: Volume 1 Nomor 1 (Maret 2022)
Publisher : Department of Petroleum Engineering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (593.379 KB) | DOI: 10.31599/bpe.v1i1.1013

Abstract

Evaluation of Water Shut Off and Opening a New Layer of the Bagong Well in the Lesma Field, In oil and gas exploitation activities at the Bg01 Well, the well has been in production for a long time, so there is a problem where the proportion of water content in production wells continues to increase. compared to the proportion of oil and gas content produced, the improvement is carried out using the water shut off method by closing the existing perforation holes and opening new perforations in the same layer. Or closing the existing perforation holes that are indicated to cause an increase in water and the production of other perforated parts. By closing the layer, it is hoped that the water cut will decrease so that it will increase oil and gas production.
Penentuan Jenis Fluida Reservoar Di Lapangan M, Blok N, Sumatera Selatan Nugroho Marsiyanto
JURNAL BHARA PETRO ENERGI Vol 1 No 1: Volume 1 Nomor 1 (Maret 2022)
Publisher : Department of Petroleum Engineering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (699.478 KB) | DOI: 10.31599/bpe.v1i1.1014

Abstract

Reservoir fluid type in oil or gas field must be determined very early in the life of reservoir because it is as critical factor in many of decisions made about producing strategy of the fluid from the reservoir. It also influence in the depletion reservoirs strategy. Reservoir fluid type can be confirmed only by observing a representative fluid sample in the laboratory testing. However, rules of thumb based on production data such as initial producing GOR, stock tank liquid gravity, and stock tank liquid color usually will indicate reservoir fluid type of those reservoirs. M field was discovered in December 1989 with the drilling of M-1 well. Subsequently, in July 1991, the M-2 well was drilled. In November 1997, an appraisal well, M-3, was drilled. Based on total production testing at M field indicated that the potential deliverability is 30 MMSCFD and M field have being produced since March 2002 up to date from those three wells. Objective of this paper is to determine fluid type in this M field. Based on the laboratory testing data from those 3 wells, the heptane plus concentration of M1 well is 0.47 % mole, the heptane plus concentration of M2 well is 0.67 % mole, and the heptane plus concentration of M3-well is 0.64 % mole. The Initial Gas Oil Ratio of M field refer to well testing is ranging from from 75,000 scf/STB to 554,545 scf/STB which is high GOR producing. Based on those 2 methods to determine reservoir fluid types, the laboratory testing and rules of thumb on intial production data, the fluid type of M field is categorized as A Dry Gas. This fluid determination is giving the advantages of strategic field drainage optimally and economically to the field.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6