cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 10, No 2 (2021)" : 5 Documents clear
ASEAN ATTITUDES TOWARD PATENT PROTECTION OF THE COVID-19 VACCINE VERSUS HUMANITARIAN INTERESTS Tomson Situmeang; Erni Murniarti
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.255-276

Abstract

The global pandemic of the Covid-19 outbreak has caused problems in various aspects of life. Several countries have invented or made the Covid-19 vaccine. However, there are still many countries that have not been able to find or make the Covid-19 vaccine, including ASEAN countries. This raises questions that are the topic of discussion in this article, namely about ASEAN's attitude towards 2 different interests between patent protection for the Covid-19 vaccine and humanitarian interests in overcoming the Covid-19 outbreak. Does Patent protection take priority or humanitarian interest take precedence? To discuss this topic, the authors use normative legal research methods based on secondary data or bibliography. The topic was discussed by comparing various legal provisions, both national and international, in order to obtain the main findings stating that patent protection also prioritizes humanitarian interests
THE DYNAMICS OF RATIFICATION ACTS OF INTERNATIONAL TREATY UNDER INDONESIAN LEGAL SYSTEM Ari Wirya Dinata
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.197-218

Abstract

The Ratification Act is a legal product that states Indonesia's commitment to an international treaty. The constitutionality of these laws has been tested before the Constitutional Court. In its decision, the Constitutional Court stated that the Ratification Acts is the object of judicial review as stipulated in article 24 C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Even though there were two differences of opinion in the verdict on the ASEAN Charter Ratification Laws review, namely the Justice: Hamdan Zoelva and Maria Farida. The two judges categorized the Laws on the Ratification of International Treaties, not in the category of laws reviewed by the Constitutional Court. This decision explains the position of the Ratification Law in the Indonesian legal system and its future implications. This paper discusses the position of the Ratification Acts under the Indonesian legal system and the implications that will occur after the future Constitutional Court decisions on the development and relations of national law and international law. This writing uses secondary data and also primary, secondary, and tertiary legal material. This writing found the inconsistency of Indonesia in making ratification acts of International Law. It emerges that implication to the status of ratification acts. Moreover, The Constitutional Court decision tries to clarify ratification acts under the Indonesian legal system.
TELEMEDICINE SERVICES OF THE INDIVIDUAL HEALTH RIGHTS IN NEW NORMAL ERA Rospita Adelina Siregar
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.300-314

Abstract

Regarding the right to protect and respect individual rights as stated in positive law in Indonesia, these rights are part of the human rights of every citizen. So that the state is obliged to guarantee the availability and fulfillment of these rights, in order to avoid the threat of abuse and violations by various parties, including state officials themselves. During the Covid-19 pandemic the question is how can the right to individual health be obtained and the state can guarantee it? This research uses sociological normative juridical research by conducting a survey of 531 respondents in Jakarta in March 2020. The results of the study were analyzed qualitatively so that the state has the authority to guarantee telemedicine services as a form of state responsibility in the new normal era according to Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 2019 concerning the Implementation of Telemedicine Services between Health Service Facilities.
THE LEGAL POSITION OF WORKERS AS PREFERRED CREDITORS WHO BECOME THE APPLICANT FOR BANKRUPTCY AGAINST THE COMPANY Ani Wijayati; Anton Nainggolan; Yessi Melati Krisnawati
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.229-244

Abstract

This study aims to trace the contradictions of sentencing arrangements in child sexual abuse crimes in Aceh after the enactment of Qanun No. 6 of 2014 with Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. The regulation of child sexual abuse punishment in jinayat law in Aceh has different interpretations from other laws and regulations, including Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection. So the essence of the deterrent effect for perpetrators that should be part of the goal of criminalization is not so achieved. In addition, Qanun Jinayat also has the potential for impunity for the government with Article 9 and Article 11 Qanun No. 6 of 2014 on the reasons for justification and forgiving reasons. The method used in this paper is a normative juridical method, using secondary data or library data. The study results showed that in Aceh, there had been a dualism of the legal regulation of child sexual abuse. The provisions of qanun jinayat are still many shortcomings in providing protection and rights for children as victims, so law enforcement tends to choose positive laws. It is recommended that the Aceh government to harmonize the law between jinayat law provisions and positive laws relating to sexual harassment.
KONTRADIKSI PENGATURAN HUKUMAN PELAKU PELECEHAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK DI ACEH Andi Rachmad; Yusi Amdani; Zaki Ulya
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.315-336

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menelusuri kontradiksi pengaturan hukuman dalam tindak pidana pelecehan seksual terhadap anak di Aceh pasca diberlakukannya Qanun No. 6 Tahun 2014. Pengaturan hukuman pelecehan seksual terhadap anak dalam hukum jinayat di Aceh mempunyai perbedaan penafsiran dengan peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya termasuk UU No. 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Sehingga esensi efek jera bagi pelaku yang seharusnya menjadi bagian tujuan pemidanaan tidak begitu tercapai. Selain itu, Qanun Jinayat juga berpotensi untuk terjadinya impunitas bagi pemerintah dengan adanya Pasal 9 dan Pasal 11 Qanun No. 6 Tahun 2014 mengenai alasan pembenaran serta alasan pemaaf. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini yaitu metode yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan data sekunder atau data kepustakaan.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue