Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

ASEAN ATTITUDES TOWARD PATENT PROTECTION OF THE COVID-19 VACCINE VERSUS HUMANITARIAN INTERESTS Tomson Situmeang; Erni Murniarti
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.255-276

Abstract

The global pandemic of the Covid-19 outbreak has caused problems in various aspects of life. Several countries have invented or made the Covid-19 vaccine. However, there are still many countries that have not been able to find or make the Covid-19 vaccine, including ASEAN countries. This raises questions that are the topic of discussion in this article, namely about ASEAN's attitude towards 2 different interests between patent protection for the Covid-19 vaccine and humanitarian interests in overcoming the Covid-19 outbreak. Does Patent protection take priority or humanitarian interest take precedence? To discuss this topic, the authors use normative legal research methods based on secondary data or bibliography. The topic was discussed by comparing various legal provisions, both national and international, in order to obtain the main findings stating that patent protection also prioritizes humanitarian interests
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF TENTANG PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI INDONESIA Hendri Jayadi; Tomson Situmeang; Poltak Siringoringo; I Dewa Ayu Widyani; L Elly AM Pandiangan; Putu George Matthew Simbolon
JURNAL Comunità Servizio Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): APRIL
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM), Univesitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33541/cs.v5i1.4287

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide an understanding of land dispute resolutions available under Indonesian regulations. This article is applying the normative method under the statutory approach. Furthermore, the writer may provide the discussion of this article by expressing that there are two main classifications of land dispute resolution forums. The first forum known as the non-adjudication forum consists of mediation, conciliation, consultation, and facilitation. Meanwhile, the second forum is divided into two sub-classification consisting of the adjudication method and the non-adjudication method. The adjudication method consists of dispute settlement through a district court triggered by an ownership right dispute, and a dispute settlement through an administrative court regarding the legality of a land certificate. Besides that, the second sub-classification of this adjudication method consists of dispute settlement through arbitration that can be triggered due to an arbitration agreement with land as its object.
Makna delik penodaan agama dalam pasal 156a KUHP dan undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang KUHP Lonna Yohanes Lengkong; Tomson Situmeang
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 9, No 4 (2023): JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Theraphy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/020232682

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui makna delik penodaan agama dalam pasal 156A KUHP dan Undang-Undang nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang KUHP.Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis-normatif. Objek penelitian adalah pasal 156A KUHP dan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP. Metode pengolahan dan penyajian menggunakan bahan hukum primer melalui pengkajian sumber-sumber yang sudah terdokumentasikan dalam bentuk bahan- bahan hukum. Metode analisis penelitian kualitatif yaitu dengan memberikan analisis pada bahan-bahan hukum yang telah tersedia. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa penerapan ketentuan Pasal 156a KUHP dalam perkara-perkara Penistaan Agama telah keluar dari jalur makna yang sesungguhnya. Hal ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam penegakan hukum pidana. Dengan terbitnya UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP, yang baru diberlakukan pada 2036 mendatang, maka pemaknaan norma hukum pidana terkait tindak pidana agama atau kepercayaan harus dilakukan secara hati-hati dan sangat dibutuhkan penjelasan ahli hukum pidana secara kasuistis.
REPOSISI PENGADILAN PAJAK MENURUT SISTEM KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DI INDONESIA Tomson Situmeang
Honeste Vivere Vol 32 No 2 (2022): JULI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v32i2.138

Abstract

Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia adalah kekuasaan yang bebas dan merdeka. Pengadilan Pajak sebagai Pengadilan Khusus adalah pelaksana kekuasaan kehakiman, akan tetapi sampai saat ini masih berada di bawah dua atap, Mahkamah Agung dan Kementerian Keuangan. Hal tersebut tentu dapat mempengaruhi kebebasan Hakim dalam memeriksa dan memutus Sengketa Pajak. Hal ini perlu diteliti tentang kedudukan Pengadilan Pajak dalam sistem kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia dan reposisi atas kedudukan tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan teori kepastian hukum dan teori pemisahan kekuasaan. Hasil penelitian ini medapati bahwa Pengadilan Pajak seharusnya berada di bawah satu atap, yaitu di bawah Mahkamah Agung, hal mana mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Undang-Undang Mahkamah Agung dan Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, sehingga sejalan dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi atas Judicial Review Undang-Undang Pengadilan Pajak, maka Pengadilan Pajak harus direposisi dan ditempatkan berada di lingkungan peradilan tata usaha negara.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS PELEPASAN HAK ISTIMEWA BAGI PEMEGANG CORPORATE GUARANTEE AKIBAT WANPRESTASI DEBITOR BANK Setyo Sardjono; Hulman Panjaitan; Hendri Jayadi; Tomson Situmeang
Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 1 (2023): January
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i1.178

Abstract

The bank's activity as an intermediary is to collect and distribute funds in the form of credit. Creditors in providing credit to debtors adhere to the principle of prudence, because creditors are faced with credit risk. For this reason, banks in providing credit to debtors have several conditions that must be met, including the existence of guarantees, both material (material) and immaterial (individual) guarantees. One form of individual guarantee is a guarantor (borghtoct), which is found in the case of the Supreme Court's Decision on Bankruptcy and PKPU. The research method used is normative research with a statutory approach. The results of the study found that the petitioned bankruptcy case was rejected or at least declared unacceptable because the PKPU applicant did not have legal standing because the facility agreement underlying the debt was legally invalid and therefore null and void, as well as the company guarantee deed as well as the legal limit.
PARENTS' LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE USE OF INFORMATION MEDIA AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS BY CHILDREN IN THE CURRENT DIGITAL ERA Tomson Situmeang; I Dewa Ayu Widyani; Andree Washington
Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 1 (2023): January
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i1.186

Abstract

In the digital era, especially during the current COVID-19 pandemic, the demands of parents' roles and responsibilities towards children, especially to build relationships and communicate with children, are very important and relevant. Digitization in all aspects of life after the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way people live in general and are "forced" to enter and live in the digital world. Stand on this, the law exists to give meaning to family life, in the form of parental responsibility and children’s respect for parents, even in the digital era.
PENERAPAN ASPEK KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PERJANJIAN LISENSI DAN WARALABA PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 394/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel. Tomson Situmeang; Hendri Jayadi; Liana Setiawan
Honeste Vivere Vol 34 No 1 (2024): January In Press
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v34i1.310

Abstract

In business, agreements are the basis for running a business. However, it is not uncommon for agreements to experience problems, where one of the parties commits a breach of contract or acts against the law. In Indonesia, foreign business actors often have doubts about investing or collaborating with Indonesian companies, because there is no guarantee of legal certainty. Among them, a business agreement dispute between Harvey Nichols and Company Limited and PT Hamparan Nusantara and PT Mitra Adiperkasa, Tbk. The business agreement begins with the signing of an Exclusive License Agreement. This problem is quite interesting and complex, where apart from the International Arbitration decision, there is also the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 394/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel. which are contradictory to each other which gives rise to legal uncertainty. This article was written to discuss this matter, namely regarding the Application of Legal Certainty Aspects in License Agreements and Franchise Agreements in Decision Number 394/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel. In this paper, a normative juridical research method is used with a statutory approach and a case approach. The theory of legal certainty is used to analyze existing problems. The analysis concludes that the Exclusive License Agreement is not the same as a Franchise Agreement or a License Agreement for Intellectual Property Rights. This Exclusive Permit Agreement has its own specifics as an Unnamed Agreement (innominaat). This agreement is a form of innovation and implementation of current developments in economic and business practices in the world. The agreement is subject to the provisions of Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, Article 1319 of the Civil Code, and Article 1320 of the Civil Code which regulate the conditions for the validity of an agreement, namely: the agreement of those who bind themselves, their ability to make an agreement; a certain thing, and a lawful cause.
Makna delik penodaan agama dalam pasal 156a KUHP dan undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang KUHP Lonna Yohanes Lengkong; Tomson Situmeang
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 9, No 4 (2023): JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Theraphy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/020232682

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui makna delik penodaan agama dalam pasal 156A KUHP dan Undang-Undang nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang KUHP.Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis-normatif. Objek penelitian adalah pasal 156A KUHP dan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP. Metode pengolahan dan penyajian menggunakan bahan hukum primer melalui pengkajian sumber-sumber yang sudah terdokumentasikan dalam bentuk bahan- bahan hukum. Metode analisis penelitian kualitatif yaitu dengan memberikan analisis pada bahan-bahan hukum yang telah tersedia. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa penerapan ketentuan Pasal 156a KUHP dalam perkara-perkara Penistaan Agama telah keluar dari jalur makna yang sesungguhnya. Hal ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam penegakan hukum pidana. Dengan terbitnya UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP, yang baru diberlakukan pada 2036 mendatang, maka pemaknaan norma hukum pidana terkait tindak pidana agama atau kepercayaan harus dilakukan secara hati-hati dan sangat dibutuhkan penjelasan ahli hukum pidana secara kasuistis.