cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ilhamdi Putra
Contact Email
llr@law.unand.ac.id
Phone
+6282172712687
Journal Mail Official
llr@law.unand.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas Kampus Limau Manis Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Lareh Law Review
Published by Universitas Andalas
ISSN : 29298827     EISSN : 29882745     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Social,
Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences
Hukum Hukum Perdata HukumTata Negara Hukum Administrasi Negara Hukum Pidana Hukum Internasional Hukum Acara Hukum Adat Hukum Bisnis Hukum Lingkungan Hukum Islam Hukum Informasi Teknologi dan Transaksi Elektronik Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Politik Hukum Perubahan Undang-Undang Kejaksaan terkait Kerjasama dengan Lembaga Penegak Hukum dan Instansi Lainnya Alfy Nazah Aulia; Arfiani Arfiani; Henny Andriani
Lareh Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Lareh Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/llr.1.2.139-148.2023

Abstract

Legal politics is necessary for examining the changes that need to be made to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office to meet the needs of society. An analysis in Article 33 of the aforementioned law, which shows how crucial law enforcement agencies are in collaborating in the implementation of state power. The purpose of this article is to understand the legal politics of change and the implications of changes in collaboration regulations between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies and institutions. This article uses a Normative Juridical method. The research findings are as follows: first, the legal politics of the changes in Law Number 16 of 2004, which became Law Number 11 of 2021 on amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office, especially in Article 33 related to the collaboration of the Republic of Indonesia's Prosecutor's Office with other law enforcement agencies and institutions, were established to determine the position of the Prosecutor's Office in law enforcement in Indonesia. Therefore, the Prosecutor's Office collaborates with other law enforcement agencies and institutions to achieve the goals of the Prosecutor's Office itself. Second, the implications of the changes in Article 33 of the aforementioned law have an impact on the role of the Prosecutor's Office in the performance of prosecution, which can collaborate with various national and international law enforcement agencies, including institutions or organizations. Collaboration between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies can be seen in Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs).
Perbedaan Pandangan Terhadap Pembatasan Hak Dipilih Antara Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Qaidah Bazilah Bazlaa; Dian Bakti Setiawan; Feri Amsari
Lareh Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Lareh Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/llr.1.2.117-127.2023

Abstract

In general elections, the public has the right, namely, not to vote, and the right to be elected. The right to be elected is the right of citizens to be elected as members of deliberative bodies or representatives of the people in a general election. Article 240 paragraph (1) letter g of the General Election Law regulates restrictions on the right to vote for former corruption convicts. Regarding the norms in this article, the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court have different views. This is formulated in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/PUU-XX/2022 and the Supreme Court Decision Number 46P/HUM/2018. This article analyzes the views of Constitutional Justices and Supreme Court Justices regarding the norms in article 240, paragraph (1) letter g. The purpose of this article is to find out how voting rights are limited for former corruption convicts. This article uses a normative juridical research method. The research results found that first, restrictions on the right to vote for former convicts may be carried out in the interests of ensuring the freedom of disadvantaged groups. Second, in deciding a decision, the judge is obliged to explore, follow and understand the legal values ​​and sense of justice that exist in society as well as pay attention to the juridical aspect.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Dalam Investasi Ilegal Akibat Promosi Media Online Influencer Melalui Akun Youtube Shelsy Merinda; Dian Amelia; Upita Anggunsuri
Lareh Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Lareh Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/llr.1.2.176-189.2023

Abstract

The use of social media in online investment activities should ideally provide convenience to the public for investing their assets. The prevalence of online investments within the community does not rule out the possibility that some of them are illegal or unauthorized investments, leading to losses for citizen. Legal protection  can be provided to investors namely domains of illegal futures brokerage companies, cessation of illegal futures trading promotion, monitoring and observation of illegal futures trading sites by the regulatory authority. However, there are no explicit rules regarding penalties for influencers promoting binary option trading due to the lack of clear regulations about binary options. The research questions addressed in this study are: What is legal protection to investors in illegal investments  YouTube? What is the function of  BAPPEBT) to prevent illegal investments due to online influencer promotions YouTube? This research uses the normative juridical. The Conclusion of the research are BAPPEBTI offers preventive protection to the public by continually monitoring and educating about investment procedures in line with regulations. BAPPEBTI can block illegal sites based on regulation, but it can’t prohibit binary option trading due to the persistent emergence of domain sites. Contradictory regulations regarding the submission of claims for Restitution and Compensation result in investors lacking legal protection. BAPPEBTI’s role involves ongoing efforts in monitoring, observation, blocking illegal investment websites, education, and public awareness campaigns. BAPPEBTI is also part of the anti investment scam task force  to halt investment solicitation and remove  content related to Quotex and binary options.
Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Hak Publisitas Potret dalam Novel Fanfiksi yang Dikomersialkan witriani; Rembrandt Rembrandt; Yussy Adelina Mannas
Lareh Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Lareh Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The allure attached to famous figures brings economic value that should be considered and protected. When a commercially marketed fanfiction novel uses the portrait of a famous figure as its cover, questions arise about whether the used portrait has obtained permission. This is where the importance of the right to publicity for the inherent characteristics of famous figures comes into play, needing to be upheld as a property right because portraits are protected as economically oriented intellectual property. This article will discuss how the regulation, government role, and protection of portrait publicity rights in Indonesia are approached through a juridical empirical and descriptive-analytical perspective. The article concludes that portrait publicity rights are regulated in Article 9 and Article 12 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014. The state provides legal protection for owners of portrait publicity rights, both preventive and punitive protection. Preventive protection involves announcing the creation of the portrait, registering the portrait with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, and creating a license agreement between the licensor and licensee to later be registered with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, as portraits are considered intangible movable property, and their transfer is done in writing. On the other hand, punitive protection against commercially exploited portraits consists of non-litigation avenues (arbitration and alternative dispute resolution) and litigation avenues (courts). The government has a role in monitoring the creation and distribution of copyright infringement content.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Lareh Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Lareh Law Review