cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
YUSUF ADIWIBOWO
Contact Email
lentera.hukum@unej.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lentera.hukum@unej.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. jember,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Lentera Hukum
Published by Universitas Jember
ISSN : 23554673     EISSN : 26213710     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
E-Journal Lentera Hukum merupakan sarana ilmiah bagi mahasiswa untuk menyalurkan pemikiran-pemikiran ilmiah di bidang ilmu hukum. Artikel yang dikirim belum pernah dipublikasikan atau tidak dalam proses penerbitan dalam berkala ilmiah lain. E-Journal Lentera Hukum terbit tiga kali dalam setahun yaitu April, Juli, dan Desember. Diterbitkan secara elektronik atas kerjasama Fakultas Hukum dan UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM" : 5 Documents clear
Menilai Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Lela Tyas Eka Prihatining Cahya; Dwi Endah Nurhayati; Dodik Prihatin AN
Lentera Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.4494

Abstract

This writing examines the consideration of judge to the decision concerning violence case according to Article 170 KUHP (Criminal Code) and evaluates conformity of decision with the provision of Article 197 Paragraph (1) KUHAP (Criminal Procedure Code) in the case of violence happened in Mojokerto. It takes into account of the judge to decide consideration which has the consequence of a decision made by the judge void by law. It uses statute and conceptual approaches analyzed through Article 170 KUHP and Article 197 Paragraph (1) KUHAP linked to the doctrine of experts to corroborate argument from the authors. In conclusion, this research considers the statement of the judge that the defendant guilty of a criminal offense according to Article 170 Paragraph 1 KUHP does not conform with the fact in the court wherein the court it is obtained the explanation from the witness that the letter of Visum et Repertum and a statement of the defendant done are exercised by the defendants caused casualties sustained. In addition, in making decision, the judge does not refer to Article 197 Paragraph (1) letter d and h so in which the decision should be declared void by law. Keywords: Consideration of Judge, Criminal Offense, Violence
Cerai Gugat Akibat Murtad (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Palu No: 0249/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Pal) Diana Aristanti; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti; Pratiwi Pusphitho Andini 
Lentera Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.4492

Abstract

Marriage can be over when one of the parties becomes apostate in which apostate may cause problems of housewifery. In this research, it argues that the judge adopts a verdict according to the Law Number 1/ 1974 and Compilation of Islamic Law. The article uses legal research which accords to the norms in the positive law including the judge decision. It concludes that apostate can affects the marriage and the children right to inheritance. Additionally, divorce may not be renewed except both conducts a new marriage. In pertaining to the children right to heritance, children could not inherit their apostate parent(s) because Islamic law determines that apostate can be the reason of losing the right to inheritance. Keywords: Divorce, Apostate, Adjudication, Children Right to Inheritance.
Peran Serta Masyarakat Dalam Proses Penyusunan Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup Yurike Inna Rohmawati Ciptaningrum; Warah Atikah; Nurul Laili Fadhilah
Lentera Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.4796

Abstract

Environmental Impact Analysis or called EIA is a preventive measure to prevent environmental damage as well as a prerequisite for getting an environmental license. The EIA in its preparation should involve the society, but there are still many societies that have not been fully involved by investors/business actors and the government. Whereas the society has the right and obligation to keep environment. The lack of social involvement to result in further about an assessment of social participation in the process of preparing EIA. The written uses normative juridical methods in addressing issues related to guarantees of protection concerning society involvement in the process of preparing to EIA and the legal consequences of non-involvement of the society. Discussion results show that society involvement in the EIA compilation process has been protected and guaranteed its rights by regulation but the implications of the regulation are still minimal. Consequently, the involvement of the public with the implications of EIA documents may be submitted to the Administrative Court and investors/business actors shall be required to improve the phase of the non-involvement of the society in the process of preparing the EIA in accordance with the court's verdict. Keywords: Social Participation, Environmental Impact Analysis, Administrative Court
Rekonseptualisasi Seleksi Hakim Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hakim Konstitusi yang Berkualifikasi Indramayu Indramayu; Jayus Jayus; Rosita Indrayati
Lentera Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.5267

Abstract

Integrity, good character, justice, and expert statesman of the constitution as the indicators to appoint Constitutional Judge should be taken into account by the Supreme Court, the House, and the President in the selection process. The cases of corruption named Akil Mochtar and Patrialis Akbar as the convicted and the suspected persons respectively should be regarded as an appropriate opportunity to evaluate law relating to the Constitutional Judges selection process in which it is not clearly defined in the Constitutional Court Act. To date, the law relating to selection is given to respective institutions where the Supreme Court takes the selection internally with no transparency, the House only requires to write and present article, and—in some cases—the President prefers to appoint with no adequate criteria. The article uses doctrinal research in addressing the case related to the current regulation on constitutional judge selection. It concludes that the Supreme Court, the House, and the President ignore the principles of transparency, participatory, objectivity, and accountability in the selection, including the possibility of resulting unqualified judge. The selection needs reconceptualization comprising the establishment of expert panel, unaffiliated candidate to a political party, and re-concept of selection mechanism. Keywords: Reconceptualization, Selection, Constitutional Judge
Perjudian Online: Kajian Pidana atas Putusan Nomor 1033/PID.B/2014/PN.BDG Muhammad Fajrul Falah; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Samuel SM Samosir
Lentera Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v4i1.4493

Abstract

Law Number 11 / 2008 on Information and Electronic Transaction (UU ITE) is the regulation concerning on criminal law in addition to the Criminal Code (KUHP). UU ITE is commonly regarded additional regulation of the Criminal Code as a special law (lex specialis) in which Penal Code is deemed as lex generalis. It is based on the principle of lex specialis derogate legi generalis. This article uses legal research to review the decision of District Court in Bandung Number 1033/PID.B/2014/PN.BDG where it comprises legislation and cases. It concludes that the judge is not frugal in applying the principle lex specialis derogat legi generalis in the consideration. This is associated with the indictment of public prosecutor which only prejudges with article 303 paragraph (1) to 2. In contrast, the indictment which does not meet the requirement of a careful, clear, and complete description asserts to become void by law. Keywords: Online Gambling, Criminal Principle, Indictment

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10 No 2 (2023): In Progress Vol 10 No 1 (2023): Human Rights in Indonesia and Beyond Vol 9 No 3 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 9 No 2 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 9 No 1 (2022): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 3 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 2 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 8 No 1 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 3 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 2 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 7 No 1 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 3 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 2 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 6 No 1 (2019): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 3 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 2 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 5 No 1 (2018): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 3 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 2 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 4 No 1 (2017): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 3 (2016): December 2016 Vol 3 No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 3 No 3 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 2 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 3 No 1 (2016): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 3 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 2 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 2 No 1 (2015): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1 No 2 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1 No 1 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM Vol 1, No 1 (2014) More Issue