cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
KEADILAN PROGRESIF
Published by Universitas Bandar Lampung
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal ini berisi hasil riset atau tinjauan atas suatu permasalahan hukum yang berkembang di masyarakat (artikel lepas), dimungkinkan juga tulisan lain yang dipandang memberikan kontribusi bagi pengembangan ilmu hukum. Pertama kali terbit pada September 2010. Terbit dua kali setahun, setiap Maret dan September.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret" : 8 Documents clear
Akibat Hukum Dan Psikososial Dari Perkawinan Antar Penganut Agama (Tinjauan Hukum Islam Dan Undang-Undang No.1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan) . Baharudin
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1710.614 KB)

Abstract

The legal implication from difference religion marriage (lslam law and Marriage Law No.l year 1974 perspective), there is no reason whatever thut dilference religion marriage can at agree, because Islam law and Marriage Law No.l year 1971 perspective is prohibit, therefore, if happen difference religion marriage, so the marriage status not valid, so also with child status. wtlhout the valid difference religion marriage, so bring consequence to wards marriage license, divorce, iheritance, death and ratification birdhs  child certificate. The diference religion marriage contain risk towards soul development, because many factors that be marriage confict, well- being in one of also the two so also with lhe children soul development  also will have towards society environment,because marriage not only involve two individual but also deliver family and society,nation and country.
Hak Subpoena sebagai Instrumen Pendukung Pelaksanaan Fungsi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat . Zamrony
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (87.309 KB)

Abstract

Rights of the house of representatives to present and give information to someone byforce (subpoena rights), accompanied by sanctions hostage is controversial. On oneside, the autorities forcibly required for the functions of the House to run well. Buton other side, the force is potential to create uncertainty due to the arbitrariness ofits implementation mechanisms. Parliament is not a law enforcement agency but apolitical institution. Ideally, the sactions also held political sactions. Moreover,subpoena rights design owned by Parliament can be used in every implementationthe functions. Initially, the right to subpoena can only be used in the implementationof inquiry as the most special rights owned by the House of Representatives. But now,in legislation the right to subpoena expanded scope. The implication, in every forumsession, the Parliament has the ultimate weapon that make it as a superior institution.
Pro Dan Kontra Terhadap Perspektif Gender Dalam Undang-Undang No.1 Tahtjn 1974 Tentang Perkawinan . Ermasyanti
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1662.463 KB)

Abstract

The pro and contra towards gender perspective in Marriage law No.1 year 1974, there two perspective, is : 1) contra perspective, wife in domestic area and husband presents in public area, this wisdom doesn’t  give justice, puhes woman improverishment process. In Marriage law found discrimination towards woman should be abolished, with be ratified woman be Law No. 7 year 1984 about Discrimination, Abolition Towards Woman, so that, necessary right formulation revision and spouse duty in marriage law. Pro perspective, marriage laws correct and unnecessary at revision because right and duty must not be interpretted corred but be seen based on moral and the philosophy. The marriage is pray, hoppy family must basd on affection, mutual respect,love to love and mutual give good aid borns and mind. Task situating and responsibility must be discriminated by harmonization and symmetrical so that firm and shoulderred with responsibility . 
Implikasi Globalisasi dan Penegakan Hukum Progresif di Indonesia Dharma Setiawan Pagaralam
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (107.995 KB)

Abstract

The implication of globalization toward Indonesia law order, most off all enter topass international agreement that ratified, influential towards law system, that isfrom aspect subtance with more law and regulation quantity that profess tounderstand liberal or neo-liberal; from structure aspect influences aparatur in decidewisdom inclined pro-state progress regardless of society condition, and from aspectcurtural influences manner looks at, attitude, and society behaviour inclined individualtowards obedience and cognizance right and law duty. Law enforcement in Indonesiais crisis, such crisis condition, can be sowed with institution loss authoritative,curropt apparatus and figured think positivistic analytic, low of legal cultural society,with legal culture doesn’t support, so that need a efforts approaches new progressive,by think holistik.
Pengawasan Yuridis dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Sistem Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Konstitusional Tanto Lailam
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2047.298 KB)

Abstract

Juridical control in order to realizirrg constilutional gorerhmehtal system, Juridical control by cohslitution court is juridical control form to prolecling indonesia people eokstitutional right,jutidical conttol to good democracy prccess (president and vice- president electioh, legislative election) also local election, juridical contrcl aboul state organ dispute, and Juridical control of president and vice presidenl of impeachment process. Juridical control functiok by cohstitution courl gtves opportunity lor cohstitulional govenmenld I system based on constitution. Juridical control by Juslice Cont about judicial reviev in this case Juslice Courl as lhe legitb&te inlerpreter ofthe ldw andjuslice, and administr.tlioh coultjuridical conlrcl isjuridical co lrol institution thal has authority to evaluates administration decision oppose against regulation and general basisso fgood, clean, strong government
Upaya Perlindungan Benda Cagar Budaya Lawang Sewu Semarang Dwi Haryadi
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1460.975 KB)

Abstract

Indonesia has many ancient buildings spread in  almos regions. One of them is Lawang Sewu in Semarang. The position is very strategic because it is located on Jalan Pemuda precisely on the right side of Tugu Muda. Howevetr, its position as a sanctuary protected by Law as well as an inheritance of previous history is not in tune with the concerned condition and ,he preservation and protection efforts. The protection eforts of lawang sewu as cultule security thing in this time not yet done according lo maximal, either by Semarang city government or PT.KAI DAOP IV Semarang as owner The protection of lawang sewu also doesnt quit Jrom many factors: the minimum estimation, private investor not interest: The government wisdoms not yet to maximal application in culture security preservation; and still the weak pacificalion and law enforcement. 
Kontroversi Hak Asasi Manusia Antara Paham Universal dan Paham Partikular Azmi Syahputra
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1081.075 KB)

Abstract

The debate about human rights always interesting  from the stakeholder, it is about understanding of universal and particular perspectire of humdn rights, experience long  debate.Because second understand base on different  opinion between one wiith another the universal perspective understanding that provided in opinion has individual (liberalism), is the particular perspective understanding being provided in opinion has communal (sociality). The debate behween understanding universal and particular perspective to concern of human rights, final end at Wina Conference Year 1993 (produce wina Declaration and action program), where entrants Conference world, not again polarize to understand universal and particular perspective, unanimously get to understanding universality of human rights, but in the implementation is  accustommed with condition social cultural from nations and state.
Analisis Pelaksanaan Pidana Ganti Kerugian (Denda) dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bambang Hartono
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (144.971 KB)

Abstract

The corruption criminal based on Corruption law No.31 year 1999 jo CorruptionLaw No.20 year 2001 Change of Corruption law No.31 year 1999, then proved howbig executant deed consequence country loss and furthermore judge determine finemagnitude total that based on paragraph in law that base decision, when does Changeloss criminal not so be can be replaced cage. Change loss criminal can evoke scaredeffect for corruption doing an injustice executant, because besides to change loss,also must endure prison criminal and return state’s finance loss, when does changeloss criminal not paid and they also must endure cage criminal. But in fact, changesloss criminal doesn’t give scared effect for corruption doing an injustice executant,this matter is proven by stills corruption doing, an injustice quantity that in Indonesia.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2011 2011


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2022): Volume 13 No 1 Maret 2022 Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Volume 11 No.2 Maret Vol 12, No 2 (2021): September Vol 11, No 1 (2020): Maret Vol 10, No 2 (2019): September Vol 10, No 1 (2019): Maret Vol 10, No 1 (2019): Maret Vol 9, No 2 (2018): September Vol 9, No 1 (2018): Maret Vol 8, No 2 (2017): September Vol 8, No 1 (2017): Maret Vol 7, No 2 (2016): September Vol 7, No 1 (2016): Maret Vol 6, No 2 (2015): September Vol 6, No 1 (2015): Maret Vol 5, No 1 (2014): Maret Vol 3, No 2 (2012): September Vol 3, No 1 (2012): Maret Vol 2, No 2 (2011): September Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret Vol 1, No 1 (2010): September More Issue