cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Published by Kementerian Pertanian
ISSN : 02164361     EISSN : 25802674     DOI : -
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi (FAE) adalah media ilmiah komunikasi penelitian yang berisi review, gagasan, dan konsepsi orisinal bidang sosial ekonomi pertanian, mencakup sumber daya, agribisnis, ketahanan pangan, sosiologi, kelembagaan, perdagangan, dan ekonomi makro.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi" : 6 Documents clear
Efisiensi Usaha Tani Padi Melalui Pengembangan SUTPA Achmad Suryana; Ketut Kariyasa
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v15n1-2.1997.67-81

Abstract

The objective of the assessment on Rice Based Agribusiness Oriented Farming System (Sutpa) conducted in rainy season (MB) 1995/96 is to find an agribusiness development model that is capable to increase fanning efficiency and commodity's competitive advantage. The Sutpa assessment implementation main characteristics are: (1) to introduce new engineered technology packeges to enhance productivity and production efficiency; (2) to applicate technology with an economic scale; (3) to implement tight field supervision by interdicsipline team consisting of research and extension workers; (4) to applicate participatory approaches in encouraging involved farmers to play their active roles; and (5) to enhance coordination with related official and local key persons to maintain the implementation harmony beginning from its planning, implementation and evaluation. In 1995/96, Sutpa assessment implementation was concentrated in 14 provinces with an area of 46.000 Ha (92 assessment plot unit), and in the following two years it was widened in 18 and 19 provinces. Some assessment results show that rice farming using direct seeding system developed in Sutpa assessment could reduce labor utilization for 17.01 - 38.56 percent and it was able to increase production and farmer's profit for 40.26 - 43.74 percent and 14.12 - 24.10 percent respectively compared to tilt of transplanting system. The competitive advantage analysis also shows that rice fanning direct seeding system gives a competitive profit compared to that of transplanting system's at 70.23 - 82.14 percent of the existing production level. The Sutpa assessment implementation has been able to escalate new high yielding varieties and direct seeding system adoptions.
Aspek Permintaan, Penawaran dan Tataniaga Hortikultura di Indonesia Handewi Purwati Saliem
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v15n1-2.1997.44-56

Abstract

This study analiyzes demand/consumption, supply/production, and marketing of horticulture (vegetables and fruits) related to its development in Indonesia. Descriptive analysis throught cross tabulation and trend analysis of production and consumption using seondary data from CBs and result, of several research on horticulture. The result of the analysis show that (1) consumption level of vegetable and fruits in 1992 is relatively low i.e 25.8 and 28.04 Kg/Capital/year respectively.This shows a high opportunity to develop horticultural production in Indonesia; (2)  in domestic market, the dominant factors influencing holticulture consumption are number of population (consumer) and growth of average population income (3) price fluctuation, improportional price transmission between producer-retailer, and perishable characteristic of the commodities are the main problems in horticulture marketing systemin Indonesia. To anticipate the opportunity of increasing demand both domestic and export markets, the efforts can be made are (1) intensification at the production centre areas, (2) extensification to create new production areas,  (3) special attention for developing specific tropical holticulture, and  (4) effeciency in marketing by improving transportation, packaging and storage systems
Dampak Putaran Uruguay terhadap Industri Minyak Nabati Wayan Reda Susila
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v15n1-2.1997.35-43

Abstract

The succes of the Uruguay Round was projected to have positive impacts on the edible oil industries although the impacts are not proportionally distributed. Edible oil procedures in Asia Pasific countries were projected to enjoy most of the gains,while most African countries which are net importers will suffer form prices increase. Commitments related to edibe oil trade in Uruguay Round will induce the incerase in price, production , consumption , and trade of edible oils 4.0 , 3.4 , 3.8 , and 11.6 percent , respectively. Moreover,palm oil producers such as Indonesia, was projected to be most beneficial from the trade liberalization of the edible oils.
Kinerja dan Perspektif Usahatani Konservasi Alley Cropping di Indonesia Sri Hery Susilowati; Gelar Satya Budhi; I Wayan Rusastra
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v15n1-2.1997.1-16

Abstract

Alley cropping as a soil conservation technology owning certain advantages over terracing, particularly in that : a) costs are lower, b) soil productivity can be maintained, and c) it may be applied on all soil conditions. A disadvantage of alley cropping relates to the time taken for soil erosion control to become effective. However, over the longer time period, soil conversation control through alley cropping technology is more economical than that for terracing. The reviewed studies indicate that flemingia congesta is the most effective soil erosion controlling leguminous shrub,of those studied. Alley cropping is effective in maintaining land productivity. The synergic effect of soil productivity increase and soil erosion rate reduction. In some research,alley cropping systems have been shown to significantaly reduce farming costs per unit output,due to a decrease in manday (labour) use and other input reductions. In implementing alley cropping, land-holding status is one determining fector in farmers' willingness to apply the technology. That is why efforts to disseminate soil cinversation technology have often used some incentive in terms of land ownership rights for farmers. It is worthwhile to develop these incentives further, so that there is a legal certainty on cultivated land. Although alley cropping technology has currently been applied and adopted by farmers to a limited degree, there are still four main assues obstructing farmers' adoption of the tecnolog: a) small scale land-holding; b) limited capital ; c) production input availability; and d) lack of technology information
Penawaran, Permintaan dan Konsumsi Produk Peternakan di Indonesia Tjeppy D. Soedjana
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v15n1-2.1997.17-34

Abstract

Supply of livestock products from 1969 to 1994 indicated that meat has been the most dominating commodity than milk and eggs due to its variability of meat producing species and of the accessibility product by consumers. However, beef and steers imports increases each year from 12,000 head in 1991 by more than 90 percent per year. Egg production from all poultry species also increasing each year that its target in production has been achieved, hence, it is indicating that national poultry industry has been successfully implemented through commercial poultry industry as well as intensification programs for both native chickens and ducks particularly in the Presidential Instruction (Inpres) program for village improvements that directly created new investments for poultry in the villages. Milk production has been contributing no more than 35 percent to the total national milk demand, even the domestic milk productivity increases and hence milk imports continues to increase in volumes. The demand  for beef and foultry meat imply is elasticity to price change paricularly for low income group and those of rural consumers. Broiler meat tends to have substitute roles with beef and complementer in nature with milk and milk products. Percapita consumption of livestock product alwalys related with consumer's income and historically the per capita consumption of meat, milk and eggs are improved  every yar and for some reasons, certain species have been achieved beyond the target. During 1998 - 2003 it is estimated that meat production may bae able to grow by 5.37 percent per year from 1.7 milion tons in 1998 to 2,5 milion tons in 2003, compared to Pelita VI (1994-1998) which grew by 5,5 percent. Eggs production is expected to grow by 3.4 percent per year from 0.7 milion tons in 1998 to 0.9 percent in 2003 while in Pelita VI it wasa able to grow by 5.4 percent. Domestic milk production which was growing by 5.7 percent in Pelita VI, is projected to grow only by 2.5 percent per year, from 0.7 milion tons in 1998 to 0.56 million tons in 2003. Only meat production will be able to meat the demand using low economic growth of 3 percent annually, and that with assumption of hight economic grow of 6 percent per year there will be no supply or production of livestock commodities are able to meets its respective demans by the consumers. Therefor, efforts to ward improving local species in terms of their productivity in the long run have to be critically anticipated due to growing population and increasing welfare and income of Indonesian people.
Swasembada Kedelai: antara Harapan dan Kenyataan Dewa Ketut Sadra Swastika
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v15n1-2.1997.57-66

Abstract

In Indonesia, soybean is the third important food crop after rice and corn. After being success in achieving rice  self-sufficiency, the goverment of Indonesia is trying to achieve self-suuficiency in other food crops like corn and soybean. Many efforts were done, including introduction of new varieties, special intensification (Gersus and Opsus), credit on palawija,and price policy, in order to encourage farmers to produce more soybean. This article is trying to show the performance of soybean self-sufficiency during the period of 25 years (1969-93) , and the future prospect of achieving self-sufficiency. The result of this study shows that since 1975 Indonesia fails to achieve self-sufficiency in soybean. This is due to the fact that the improvement of technology in soybean  cultural practice is relatively slow compared to that of rice. The slow progress of technology in combination with the slow process of transfer of technology from reseach institutes to farmers have resulted in a low yield. From 1988 to 1994 the yield was stagnant at about 1.1 tons/ha in average. Another constraint to achieve soybean self-sufficiency is the fact that soybean is a temperate crop. In Indonesia, it gives a better yield in the high altitude areas. On the other hands, soybean in high altitude is less competitived compared to horticulture crops, esspecialy vegetables. Therefore, special efforts are needed, esspecialy the utilization of bio-technology in plant breeding program of soybean in order to accelerate the achievement of soybean self sufficiency in the future

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6


Filter by Year

1997 1997


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 39, No 2 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi : In Press Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 38, No 2 (2020): Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 38, No 1 (2020): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 37, No 2 (2019): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 37, No 1 (2019): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 36, No 2 (2018): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 36, No 1 (2018): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 35, No 2 (2017): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 35, No 1 (2017): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 34, No 2 (2016): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 34, No 1 (2016): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 33, No 2 (2015): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 33, No 1 (2015): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 2 (2014): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 1 (2014): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 31, No 2 (2013): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 31, No 1 (2013): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 30, No 2 (2012): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 30, No 1 (2012): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 29, No 2 (2011): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 29, No 1 (2011): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 28, No 2 (2010): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 28, No 1 (2010): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 27, No 2 (2009): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 27, No 1 (2009): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 26, No 2 (2008): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 26, No 1 (2008): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 25, No 2 (2007): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 25, No 1 (2007): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 24, No 2 (2006): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 24, No 1 (2006): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 23, No 2 (2005): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 23, No 1 (2005): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 22, No 2 (2004): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 22, No 1 (2004): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 21, No 2 (2003): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 21, No 1 (2003): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 20, No 2 (2002): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 20, No 1 (2002): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 19, No 2 (2001): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 19, No 1 (2001): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 18, No 1-2 (2000): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 17, No 2 (1999): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 17, No 1 (1999): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 16, No 2 (1998): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 16, No 1 (1998): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 15, No 1-2 (1997): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 2 (1996): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 14, No 1 (1996): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 13, No 2 (1995): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 13, No 1 (1995): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 2 (1994): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 1 (1994): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 10, No 2-1 (1993): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 11, No 2 (1993): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 9, No 2-1 (1992): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 9, No 1 (1991): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 8, No 1-2 (1990): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 7, No 2 (1989): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 7, No 1 (1989): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 6, No 2 (1988): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 6, No 1 (1988): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 5, No 1-2 (1987): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 4, No 2 (1986): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 4, No 1 (1985): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 3, No 2 (1984): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 3, No 1 (1984): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 2, No 2 (1983): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 2, No 1 (1983): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 1, No 2 (1983): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 1, No 1 (1982): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi More Issue