cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 14117177     EISSN : 26156628     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance
SOCA merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan berkala di bidang social-ekonomi pertanian dan agribisnis, diterbitkan dua kali setahun (Januari-Juni & Juli-Desember). Jurnal SOCA merupakan media untuk penyebarluasan hasil penelitian bagi dosen, peneliti, praktisi maupun masyarakat umum yang yang konsen terhadap pembangunan pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal SOCA dikhususkan untuk menampung hasil penelitian, kajian pustaka/teoritis, kajian metodologis, gagasan original yang kritis, ulasan masalah penting/isu pembangunan pertanian yang hangat dan ulasan suatu hasil seminar.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001" : 5 Documents clear
ORIENTASI PENELITIAN PERTANIAN: MEMENUHI KEBUTUHAN PANGAN DALAM ERA GLOBALISASI MADE ANTARA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (178.738 KB)

Abstract

Since long ago Indonesia to face the food problem, even in the future will be a moreserious problem if agriculture sector as food producer not were work on seriously. Sincedecrease emphasize toward agriculture sector, in floods of import rice enter the domesticmarket so that to decrease farmer’s desire planting the rice, rely on sources of food on riceonly, and food diversification still limit of slogan or rhetoric entirely, has caused the nationalfood security system more and more become weak.It’s appeared trade-off between the goal of food security and the income growth offarmers, so in the framework of meet the national food can be met in a policy strategy of selfsufficiencyon trend. Its mean, to export when the national rice production surplus and toimport when national rice production deficit, cause the absolute self-sufficiency cannotdefended.To increase the household and national food security that faced on reduction thedepending on import food and depending on one kind source of food namely rice, so fooddiversification must be back encouraged that followed by research and development, actionprogram, and it’s to be as a national movement.Research of agriculture to meet the need of national food in globalization era, mainlyfood of non-rice carbohydrate in order to agribusiness orientation. Its mean, the research onevery subsystem of non-rice food agribusiness system, to aim increase the food production,producer income, and value added of food product mentioned, so that more and morecompetitive in domestic and national market.
AGRIBISNIS PERKEBUNAN MEMASUKI AWAL ABAD 21: BEBERAPA AGENDA PENTING WAYAN R. SUSILA; BAMBANG DRADJAT
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (86.714 KB)

Abstract

Estate-crop agribusiness has played and is still expected to play important roles inIndonesian economy. Besides its consistent contribution on economic growth and foreignexchange earning, it provides employment for more than 13 million people. In the beginningof 21st century, the estate-crop agribusiness will face various new important agenda andstrategic business environment changes related to this subsector, namely, production cost,commodity prices, market competition, trade liberalization, production policies, trade policies,regional autonomy, environmental issues, and plantation plundering. Some of them willdepress the development of the subsector in the beginning of 21st century, while the otherswill provide better opportunities for the development of the subsector or their net impacts arestill vague. To optimize the roles of the estate-crop subsector agribusiness, various importantagenda and strategic business environment changes related to the subsector should bemanaged in a such way that the negative impacts of the changes can be minimized while thepositive and vague impacts can be converted to be a growth engine of the subsector inentering the beginning of 21th century.
DAMPAK KRISIS MONETER DAN KEBIJAKSANAAN PEMERINTAH TERHADAP DAYA SAING AGRIBISNIS AYAM RAS PEDAGING DI JAWA BARAT SAPTANA -; I WAYAN RUSASTRA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (134.42 KB)

Abstract

Monetary and economic crisis started on the mid of 1997 has negative impact on theperformance and sustainability of poultry industry in this country. The main problem facedby broiler industry, namely: (1) Most of feed stuff are highly dependent on import; (2) Thestructure of input and output market are olygopolistic in nature; (3) Cooperative farming isnot consistently implemented; and (4) The price of input factor increased threefold due tomonetary and economic crisis. Based on those backgrounds, the objective of this study is toanalysis the impact of government policy on financial and economic feasibilities of broileragribusiness. The finding of the respective study conducted in two district (Bogor andTasikmalaya) indicated that: (1) Because of economic crisis, financial and economicprofitability of broiler industry decreases; (2) Private Cost Ratio (PCR) increased from 0,753– 0,873 to 0,851 – 0,989 due to crisis, indicating lower financial competitiveness; (3) Thevalue of DRCR before and after crisis are 0,727 – 0,976 vs. 0,790 vs. 0,917 which reveallower economic competitiveness; and (4) The value of Nominal Protection Coefficient (NPC)during the economic crisis showed that broiler industry experiencing disincentive for bothinput and output market. The implication of this study in relation with the development ofbroiler industry facing the economic globalization are as follows: (1) The vertical integrationand cooperation between smallholder broiler farming and input/output industry should bestrengthening in synergistic manner; (2) In order to generate foreign exchange and highervalue added through export and product development as well as product differentiation,vertical integration for all agribusiness subsystem in broiler industry should be implemented;and (3) The establishment of cooperative broiler farming system should be conducted in theregional news of potential market and feed stuff producing regions.
PERKIRAAN DAMPAK KRISIS KEUANGAN TERHADAP EKONOMI, KHUSUSNYA SEKTOR PERTANIAN DAN AGRIBISNIS DI INDONESIA MANGARA TAMBUNAN
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (107.101 KB)

Abstract

Beginning from the monetary crisis of Bath-Thailand, then gradually to spread tosouth-east Asia Countries and finally has been Indonesia monetary crisis started the thirdweek in July 1997. Monetary crisis this time to indicate that Indonesia economics more andmore open and integrated with world economics. Really Indonesia to face three kind crisisi.e.: (1) Exchange rate crisis where depreciation of rupiah value toward dollars, (2) foreigndebt crisis in big quantity, which made by private and government, and (3) probably soinfected by diminishing expectation of the community toward various of economics andfinancial institutionsTo measure the impact of monetary crisis toward quantitatively economics can be notacted now yet. What that can be acted is to expect its impacts toward economics, especially toagriculture or agribusiness sectors. For need of this research-collected macroeconomics datain the last time that sources from secondary data, processed and analyzed. Because thisresearch especially to expect the impact of monetary crisis toward agriculture or agribusinesssectors, so the agriculture data collected, processed and analyzed detailer.The result of analysis to indicate that monetary crisis in Indonesia that indicated by hasbeen weak of rupiah value to dollars, has impact toward agriculture or agribusiness sectors.Yet, impact intensity depend on: (1) sources of raw material (domestic or foreign), (2)structure of output marketing for domestic or international, and (3) structure of capital, equityand firm portfolio of agribusiness mentioned. Viewed from costly structure and return, soportion of import of input and export of output in agriculture sector significantly to influencetoward performance of agriculture or agribusiness sectors.For the agriculture or agribusiness firms that using domestic raw material in theirsproduction process, monetary crisis maybe not influence so big, if mostly theirs outputexported, this crisis will positive impact. Yet, if agriculture or agribusiness firms using rawmaterial from foreign in its production process (example cotton), monetary crisis has influencetoward costs structure (increase the cost of input and output per unit) to be bigger. If theirsoutput market for domestic, so will be gloomier. In this condition, monetary crisis has negativeinfluence toward performance of agribusiness mentioned.Result of the monetary crisis, need be acted a reevaluation to measure rate of return(ROI) investment in agriculture sector. In the last time ROR in agriculture sector only range15 percent. Not impossible if this monetary crisis has made the populace agriculture is notinteresting for investor.
PROSPEK AGRIBISNIS 2001 DAN EVALUASI PEMBANGUNAN PERTANIAN 2000 BUNGARAN SARAGIH
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (28.799 KB)

Abstract

Perbaikan ekonomi tahun 2001 sudah mulai tampak ditandai oleh beberapa indikatorekonomi seperti sektor riil sudah mulai menggeliat, aktivitas perekonomina rakyat dipedesaan sudah mulai bangkit, ekspor beberapa produk agribisnis mengalami peningkatan.,kredit Perbankan untuk mendorong bangkitnya sektor riil sudah dilonggarkan, pendapatanpenduduk sudah mulai merangkak naik dibandingkan dengan ketika krisis tahun 1997/1998.Prospek agribisnis yang cerah ini tidak dapat diraih, jika tidak diikuti langkah strategismelalu pembangunan sistem agribisnis dan usaha-usaha agribisnis termasuk usahatanikeluarga dengan peningkatan produktivitas sebagai sumber pertumbuhan.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2001 2001


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 17 No 2 (2023): Vol 17 No 2 (2023) Vol 17 No 1 (2023): Vol 17 No 1 (2023) Vol 16 No 3 (2022): Vol 16 No 3 (2022) Vol 16 No 2 (2022): Vol 16 No 2 (2022) Vol 16 No 1 (2022): Vol.16, No.1, 2022 Vol 15 No 3 (2021): Vol.15, No.3, 2021 Vol 15 No 2 (2021): Vol.15, No.2, 2021 Vol 15 No 1 (2021): Vol.15, No.1, 2021 Vol 14 No 3 (2020): Vol.14, No.3, 2020 Vol 14 No 2 (2020): Vol.14.No 2, 2020 Vol 14 No 1 (2020): Vol. 14 No. 1, 2020 Vol 13 No 3 (2019): Vol. 13, No. 3, 2019 Vol.13, No.2, 2019 Vol.13, No.1, 2019 Vol.12, No.2, 2018 Vol.12, No.1, 2018 Vol. 11, No. 1 Juli 2011 Vol. 10, No. 2 Juli 2010 Vol. 10, No. 1 Februari 2010 Vol. 9, No. 3 November 2009 Vol. 9, No. 2 Juli 2009 Vol. 8, No. 2 Juli 2008 Vol. 8, No. 1 Februari 2008 Vol. 7, No. 3 November 2007 Vol. 7, No. 2 Juli 2007 Vol. 7, No. 1 February 2007 Vol. 6, No. 3 November 2006 Vol. 6, No. 2 Juli 2006 Vol. 6, No. 1 Februari 2006 Vol. 5, No. 3 November 2005 Vol. 5, No. 2 Juli 2005 Vol. 5, No. 1 Februari 2005 Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004 Vol. 4, No. 1 Februari 2004 Vol. 3, No. 2 Juli 2003 Vol. 3, No. 1 Februari 2003 Vol. 2, No. 2 Juli 2002 Vol. 2, No. 1 Februari 2002 Vol. 1, No. 2 Juli 2001 Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001 Vol. 0, No. 1 November 2000 Vol. 4, No. 3 November2004 More Issue