Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

LIMITATIF KEWENANGAN JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Novi Mardihana Sari; I Nyoman Budiana
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 9 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (171.736 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2020.v08.i09.p03

Abstract

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan kewenangan jaksa penuntut umum dalam tindak pidana korupsi, serta mengkaji dan menganalisis limitative kewenangan jaksa dalam tindak pidana korupsi, sudahkah mencerminkan adanya kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan sesuai dengan tujuan hukum di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (Statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (Conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi, Jaksa berwenang melakukan penyelidikan, penyidikan dan penuntutan. Hal-hal yang menjadi limitatif kewenangan jaksa penuntut umum dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, serta Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. This paper aims to determine the regulation of the authority of the public prosecutor in criminal acts of corruption, and to study and analyze the limitative authority of prosecoturs in criminal acts of corruption, has it reflected the existence of legal certainty, justice and usefulness in accordance with the legal objectives in Indonesia. The method used in this paper uses the normative legal research method with the statute approach and conceptual approach. The results showed that in handling corruption, the prosecutor has the authority to conduct investigations, investigations and prosecutions. Matters which become the limitative authority of public prosecutors in handling corruption are regulated inKitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 tahun 2004 concerning the attorney general of the republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 concerning eradication of criminal acts.
AMICUS CURIAE DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA DI PENGADILAN Anak Agung Gde Rahmadi; I Nyoman Budiana
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (175.15 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i02.p12

Abstract

Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang kekuatan hukum pembuktian suatu tindak pidana menggunakan Amicus Curiae di pengadilan. Fungsi dari pada Amicus Curiae ini adalah untuk mengklarifikasi isu-isu faktual, menjelaskan isu-isu hukum yang sedang terjadi dan mewakili kelompok-kelompok tertentu. Akan tetapi Amicus Curiae ini tidak ada dasar hukumnya di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif atau penelitian kepustakaan yang berkaitan dengan substansi hukum yang bersifat normative. Hasil tulisan ini yakni Amicus Curiae tidak wajib dipergunakan oleh Hakim dalam memeriksa, mempertimbangkan serta memutus perkara. Keberadaan Amicus Curiae menjadi penting dalam upaya kemajuan perwujudan negara hukum yang demokratis di Indonesia. This paper examines the legal strength of proving a crime using Amicus Curiae in court. The function of the Amicus Curiae is to clarify factual issues, explain current legal issues and represent certain groups. However, Amicus Curiae has no legal basis in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical or literature research related to normative legal substances. The result of this paper is that Amicus Curiae is not obliged to be used by judges in examining, considering and deciding cases. The existence of Amicus Curiae is important in efforts to advance the realization of a democratic rule of law in Indonesia.
Komparasi Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Kejahatan Genosida yang Terjadi di Rwanda dan Myanmar Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Anak Agung Ngurah Riski Wahyudi; I Nyoman Budiana
Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2021): Februari, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31466

Abstract

This study aims (1) to analyze and find out the efforts to resolve genocide disputes from the perspective of international criminal law, (2) to determine the comparison of resolving genocide disputes that occurred in Rwanda and Myanmar. This type of research uses normative legal research, namely literature study, rules and literature related to genocide, and uses an argumentative descriptive approach. The results of this study explain the efforts and comparisons of resolving genocide disputes that occurred in Rwanda and Myanmar from the perspective of international criminal law. Genocide is an international crime that aims to eliminate ethnicity, ethnicity, race and religion in a systematic and structured manner. Efforts to resolve disputes are carried out in an international criminal manner and are handled by the International Criminal Court. The International Criminal Court is the highest judicial institution, and has the authority to handle international cases. comparative law is a method of investigation with the aim of obtaining deeper knowledge about certain legal materials. Comparative law is not a set of rules and legal principles and is not a branch of law, but is a technique for dealing with foreign legal elements from a legal problem. Court. The International Criminal Court is the highest judicial institution, and has the authority to handle international cases
Formulation of Customary Criminal Law in Future Criminal Code and Legal Enforcement in Indonesia Gede Eka Rusdi Antara; I Nyoman Budiana; Ida Ayu Sadnyini
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i2.149

Abstract

The pros and cons were debated in limiting national legal substance with full recognition of Customary Criminal Law in the bill of Criminal Code and its future enforcement. On the other hand, there are arguments against the inclusion of Customary Criminal Law in the Criminal Code and the resulting disparities in legal enforcement caused by some Judges’ ignorance of judging customary criminal cases settled with the imposition of customary sanctions, which resulted in an unjust situation. This article aims to serve as a legal academic framework for establishing, identifying, and analyzing the formulation of Customary Criminal Law into the Indonesian Criminal Code, as well as to contribute to the discussion of judges’ roles in sentencing customary criminal cases, which they should determine and judge based on customary law. This article demonstrated the use of normative legal research in conjunction with statutory law, legal conceptual, and philosophical approaches to law. This article discovered that: first, several issues concerning the formulation of Customary Criminal Law into several national Bills of Criminal Code were debatable; second, it also cannot be enacted due to conflicting contexts with Criminal Law principles, unwillingness, and an ambiguous law-making process. Furthermore, the prospect of including the Customary Criminal Law in the Bill of Criminal Code is based on various justifications and legal needs that reflect the diverse local genius that still exists and adheres to Pancasila law principles. Additionally, it relates to a proposed new paradigm that Judges and other legal enforcers should adopt when enforcing Customary Criminal Law in any criminal customary case.
STRATEGI PEMIKIRAN POLITIK KE ARAH PENEGASAN DAN PENGUATAN SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN PRESIDENSIIL DI INDONESIA (KAJIAN DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM TATA NEGARA DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA) I Nyoman Budiana; I Made Warta
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 16, No 4 (2019): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2019
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (623.373 KB) | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v16i4.499

Abstract

Indonesia adheres to a representative democratic system that prioritizes the interests of citizens in decisions made by the government. In this study we will discuss the strategies of people's political thinking in the framework of affirmation and strengthening the presidential system in Indonesia. Data collection and analysis in this study uses a normative juridical approach by collecting legal material from various libraries, both in the form of principles, concepts and legal theories that are in accordance with the issues of constitutional law that are adopted. The analysis was conducted in a normative juridical reseach and the presentation of legal analysis was described descriptively qualitatively.Constitutionally, the presidential system is characterized by an equal position between parliament and the executive. The Indonesian constitutional system is in the transition phase of democracy which implements a presidential based multi-party democracy system. With the simplification of the party in elections, it can guarantee stability in executive and parliamentary relations in the administration of the State. The implementation of the electoral system with sound balance cannot form a formidable parliament quality. Political thinking in the framework of affirming and strengthening presidential systems in constitutional practice is part of the people's political rights guaranteed by human rights. 
Legitimacy of the Dissolution of Beliefs by Community Organizations I Nyoman Budiana
International Journal of Research in Community Services Vol 3, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Research Collaboration Community (RCC)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46336/ijrcs.v3i1.182

Abstract

Article 28E paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution states "Every person shall be free to choose and to practice the religion of his/her choice, to choose one’s education, to choose one’s employment, to choose one’s citizenship, and to choose one’s place of residence within the state territory, to leave it and to subsequently return to it.” In paragraph (2), everyone has the right to the freedom to believe in his/her beliefs, to express his/her views and thoughts, according to his/her conscience. The constitutional guarantees for believers can also be seen in Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution stating that the state shall be based upon the One and Only God and the State guarantees all persons the freedom of worship, each according to his/her own religion or belief. The Constitutional Court affirms that the right to adhere to a religion or belief in God Almighty is a citizen's constitutional right, not a gift from the state. Therefore, the state is obliged to protect and guarantee the fulfillment of the rights of it’s the citizens to embrace a belief other than the six religions developed in Indonesia. However, in practice the dissolution of beliefs is actually carried out by community organizations. In this study, two things will be discussed namely: 1) What is the legal position of adherents of belief in the national legal system? 2) Do community organizations have the authority to dissolve religious beliefs? This research is normative juridical research, in which the problems in this research are analyzed qualitatively.
Revealing the Legal Protection of Patients Social Security Administration Agency of Health in Sanglah and Balimed Hospitals Denpasar RA Tuty Kuswardhani; I Nyoman Budiana
Jurnal Hukum Prasada Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Prasada
Publisher : Magister of Law, Post Graduate Program, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (748.81 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jhp.7.2.2020.102-110

Abstract

Social Security Administration Agency of Health has a National National Health Insurance formulary, but in reality patients do not get drugs according to the National Health Insurance National Formulary. Therefore, the aims of this study are to determine the legal protection of patients of the Social Security Administration Agency of Health for the elderly in curative therapy in hospitals according to the national formulary of National Health Insurance at Sanglah Hospital and Balimed Hospital, and to know the responsibilities undertaken by the Social Security Administration Agency of Health in fulfilling its obligations for patients the Agency for the Implementation of the Social Health Insurance of the elderly in curative therapy in accordance with the national formulary of the National Health Insurance. This study uses a participatory observational (empirical-observational) empirical legal research method. Sampling with purposive sampling and data collection techniques using triangulation techniques. In principle, legal protection must refer to legal certainty, fairness and benefits for the population participating in the Social Security Administration Agency of Health for the elderly so that it is not impressed that Balimed Hospital and Sanglah General Hospital and the Social Security Administration Agency of Health make a service to consumers who are not good. The legal responsibility that should be obtained by the participants of the Social Security Administration Agency of Health for the elderly in Balimed Hospital and Sanglah Hospital Denpasar which is currently not maximally received by patients participating in the Social Security Administration Agency of Health for the elderly at Balimed Hospital and Sanglah Hospital.
Regulation of Land Lease Rights Period for Foreign Citizens in Indonesia Putu Rosa Paramitha Dewi; I Nyoman Budiana
Jurnal Hukum Prasada Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Prasada
Publisher : Magister of Law, Post Graduate Program, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.852 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jhp.8.1.2021.44-55

Abstract

Many foreigners have come and lived in Indonesia. This results in the increasing need for land and buildings for foreigners to be used as a residence. Foreigners are not allowed to have ownership rights over land in Indonesia, however, in this case, the law provides rights for foreigners to own land in Indonesia, but limited to Right of Use and Leaseholds for Buildings. This absence of UUPA has the potential to lead to smuggling of laws, because the lease period granted to foreign citizens is not limited so that foreign citizens can stay in Indonesia for a very long. If the land is fully controlled by foreign citizens or for a long period of time, it is feared that the people's welfare will decrease in the management of the land. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the legal of land right for foreign citizens in Indonesia and the regulation of the period of land lease right for foreign citizens in Indonesia. The type of research used is a normative juridical research through a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. A foreign legal entity wishing to have Building Use Rights (HGB) must fulfill two elements, namely that it is established according to Indonesian law and domiciled in Indonesia, must exist. Besides that, regulation for the period of land lease rights for foreigners have not been regulated in land-related regulations in Indonesia so that there is a vacuum of norms.
The Implications of Village Regulation toward the Dualism of Local Leadership Dynamics I Nyoman Subanda; I Nyoman Budiana; A.A.Ngr Eddy Supriyadinata Gorda
Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Contextualizing Social Issues
Publisher : Faculty of law Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (540.859 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/UJLC.2020.v04.i01.p03

Abstract

The transformation of local leadership in Bali has implications for the emergence of various phenomena of the relationship of desa dinas (the official administrative village) and desa adat (the customary village) which both have autonomous rights. The authority of desa adat and desa dinas coincides with each other. With these conditions, various potential conflicts, poor communication patterns, and overlapping authority are very likely to occur at the local level. In this study, several issues will be discussed, namely: What is the model and process of transformation in local leadership especially in desa adat in Bali? What is the process and form of negaranisasi in local leadership especially in desa adat in Bali? What are the competencies and roles of local leaders in the local leadership process in Bali? What are the roots, the causes and solutions in handling horizontal conflicts in local leadership in Bali? Data were collected by interview, documentation and focus group discussion method to obtain sufficient data variance and validity. Furthermore, the data were analyzed qualitatively using interactive models from Miles and Huberman. The results of the study can be described, that the synergy of two (2) types of local leadership is needed. The capacity and competence of village officials and prajuru adat (customary officials) are obliged to be enhanced, strengthened and empowered, so that they are able to adapt in handling various problems that arise in rural communities in the era of modernization and globalization. For this reason, it is needed to build a synergic relationship model and leadership coordination system between desa dinas and desa adat, a model for developing the capacity and competency of village officials and prajuru adat, and developing a model for handling conflicts that have increasingly intense.
NASIONALISASI PERUSAHAAN PENANAMAN MODAL ASING DI INDONESIA I Gusti Agung Mas Triwulandari; I Nyoman Budiana
Jurnal Analisis Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (449.555 KB) | DOI: 10.38043/jah.v1i1.235

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the basis of the government action to nationalize foreign investment companies and legal protection of investors as a result of these nationalization actions. The research method used is normative juridical or library research related to normative substance of law, to find truth based on logic of science regarded from normative side by way of researching bibliography or secondary data consisting of primary law material, secondary law material and tertiary law material.The result of the research shows that the basic of nationalization action by the government underlying are due to economic inequality, where foreign capital companies start to dominate the main sectors in the national economy, and the other thing is the politics of nationalization law. Legal protection of investors is focused on preventive law protection, in which investors are given the opportunity to file an objection (inspraak) before a government decision in the definitive form of nationalization action.