Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Sekolah Dasar (JSD)

Implementasai Pembelajaran Perilaku Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Dalam Pendidikan Jasmani Brio Alfatihah; Tarpan Suparman; Aang Solahudin Anwar
Jurnal Sekolah Dasar Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Sekolah Dasar
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Buana Perjungan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jurnalsekolahdasar.v4i1.870

Abstract

Indonesia is a drug emergency, yes, this sentence illustrates the current condition of the Indonesian Replubic State. This is caused by rampant drug trafficking and abuse. In Indonesia, data from the National Narcotics Agency of the Republic of Indonesia shows in 2004 that 15% of Indonesia's population was involved in drug abuse (3.2 million) and in 2005 showed that 15,000 people died each year due to drugs (Jakarta Provincial Narcotics Agency, 2009) . The latest data on drug abuse in 2014 has increased by 4 million (BNN, 2015). Do not rule out the possibility of drug abuse will continue to increase in the following years as long as there is no education on the dangers of drug education at the Secondary School level Education is believed to solve the problem of the Indonesian people in order to avoid drug abuse. This belief is strengthened because education is a planned effort to influence others, whether individuals, groups, or the community, so that they do what is expected by education practitioners (Notoatmodjo, 2003: 16). In addition, in RI Law No. 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System, article 1. Explains that: "Education is everything that is done by someone for himself or done by someone else for him, with the aim of bringing him closer to the level of perfection" From the opinion of some experts and based on the Act –Chief The National Education System can overcome drug abuse behavior. While the education chosen by researchers is Physical Education. This consideration was chosen because in the Syllabus of learning in schools in Physical Education subjects there is some material regarding drug abuse itself. In addition to previous considerations, Physical Education not only aims to encourage physical growth, but as Freeman (2007: 27-28) states that physical education uses physical activity to produce overall improvements to the physical, mental and emotional quality of students as one complete unity. Through sports physical education and health it is expected that students become "physically educated people" who not only emphasize motor skills and movement patterns but can maintain health improvement as stated by Metzler (2005: 14) a person can become "Physically educated person" must meet the following standards: (1) demonstrate motor skills and the skills and patterns of motion needed to display various physical activities, (2) demonstrate an understanding of the concepts of motion, principles, strategies and tactics as they apply in learning and performance of various physical activities, (3) participate regularly in physical activities, (4) achieve and maintain improved health and fitness levels, (5) demonstrate personal and social responsibility in the form of respect for self and others in an atmosphere of activity s physical, and (6) values physical activity for health, pleasure, challenges, self-expression, and social interaction. Therefore the author tries to examine implementing a program to prevent drug abuse behavior in physical education. So physical education, sports and health can be one way or a protector to increase knowledge of the importance of preventing drug abuse
The Influence of Learning Motivation on The Improvement of Learning English Class V Students of SDN Sukaharja 1 Telukjambe Timur Karawang Tarpan Suparman
Jurnal Sekolah Dasar Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Sekolah Dasar
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Buana Perjungan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jurnalsekolahdasar.v6i1.1379

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in high learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation, and the difference in low learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation held in SD Negeri Sukaharja 1, Telukjambe Timur District, Karawang Regency. The method used in this research is the comparative method, which is to compare the learning motivation with the learning outcomes of the fifth grade elementary school students. With observation techniques, questionnaires, literature studies, and documentation studies. The results of testing the first hypothesis show that the average score of high learning outcomes with high motivation is 78.86 with a standard deviation of 6.87 higher than the average score of high learning outcomes with low motivation, namely 71.40 with a standard deviation of 2.51. The results of homogeneity testing of the variance of high learning outcomes between high motivation and low motivation. Fcount of 10.96 while Ftable at a significance level of 0.95 (α = 0.05) is 4.88 and a significance level of 0.99 (α = 0.01) is 10.45. This means that Fcount = 10.96> 4.88 = Ftable (0.95; 7; 5) and Fcount = 10.96> 10.45 = Fcount (0.99; 7; 5)., T-test calculation. with the results of t count of 3,971 greater than t table of 2,228 (α = 0.05) and 3,165 (α = 0.01). Then the test results prove that there are differences in high learning outcomes between high motivation and low motivation. So that one of the efforts to maintain the learning outcomes of the fifth grade students of SDN Sukaharja 1 is the high motivation given and the ability of IQ which is quite high and the willingness to learn independently. The second hypothesis testing shows that the average score of low learning outcomes with high motivation is 61.83 with a standard deviation of 2.86 higher than the average score of low learning outcomes with low motivation, which is 58.83 with a standard deviation of 2.40. The results of the homogeneity test of variance for low learning outcomes between high motivation and low motivation, Fcount of 1.42, while Ftable at a significance level of 0.95 (α = 0.05) is 4.48 and a significance level of 0.99 (α = 0.01) is 8.47. This means that Fcount = 1.42 <4.48 = Ftable (0.95; 6; 6) and Fcount = 1.42 <8.47 = Ftable (0.99; 6; 6). Then the test results prove that there is a difference in low learning outcomes between high motivation and low motivation. So that one of the efforts to improve the learning outcomes of the fifth grade students of SDN Sukaharja 1 is by providing intensive motivation and giving more homework.
Application of the Question and Answer Learning Method Through Reasoning Techniques to Improve Learning Activities of Class 6 Students at SDN Sukaharja 1 Telukjambe Timur District, Karawang Regency Yayat Suryati; Tarpan Suparman
Jurnal Sekolah Dasar Vol 6 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Sekolah Dasar
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Buana Perjungan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jurnalsekolahdasar.v6i2.1913

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the increase in student learning activities by using the question and answer method through talaran techniques carried out on grade 6 students of Sukaharja 1 Elementary School, Telukjambe Timur District, Karawang Regency. The research method used is classroom action with observational research techniques, interviews, and tests and documentation. The researcher evaluates the learning process according to the success indicators that have been determined according to the competency standards and basic competencies and compares them with the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM), which is 65. The results of the analysis in the first cycle at the fourth meeting show that the value of students is still below the KKM as many as three participants students, with the lowest score of 51, and the class average was 86.16. In the second cycle, it shows an increase in the value of students at the fourth meeting with the lowest score of 70, and none of the students get a score below the KKM. The class average score has increased to 88.25. The learning activities of students had increased, which occurred in the first cycle obtaining an average of 58.10% to 76.51%. Meanwhile, the interviews conducted in the first cycle compared to the second cycle have different activities. In the first cycle, students still acted indifferently when the teacher explained and asked questions. In the second cycle, all students can respond well. The results showed that the application of the learning method through the memorization technique could increase the activity of grade 6 students in participating in learning at the Sukaharja 1 Elementary School, Telukjambe Timur District, Karawang Regency.
Trend Evaluasi dalam Pendidikan Matematika Andes Safarandes Asmara; Tarpan Suparman
Jurnal Sekolah Dasar Vol 3 No 1 (2018): Jurnal Sekolah Dasar
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Buana Perjungan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jurnalsekolahdasar.v3i1.414

Abstract

Abstrak Pendidikan matematika di Indonesia berkembang dengan pesat sejalan dengan perkembangan pendidikan matematika dunia. Perubahan-perubahan yang terjadi dalam proses pembelajaran di kelas, dipengaruhi adanya tuntutan sesuai perkembangan teknologi dan ilmu pengetahuan juga diawali adanya perubahan pandangan tentang hakekat matematika serta pembelajarannya. Perubahan pandangan tentang trend hakekat matematika dapat mendorong terjadinya perubahan substansi kurikulum. Sementara itu perubahan pandangan tentang pembelajaran matematika sangat dipengaruhi oleh terjadinya perkembangan mengenai teori belajar baik yang bersifat umum maupun yang khusus berkaitan dengan belajar matematika. Untuk mengetahui ada nya perubahan tersebut maka di butuhkan evaluasi untuk mengukurnya. Evaluasi yang bisa digunakan untuk mengukur tingkt berpikir rendah dan tingkat berfikir tinggi, namun ada evaluasi yang dilakukan untuk mengukur pembelajaran matematika secara umum, yaitu dengan TIMMS. Abstract: Mathematics education in Indonesia is growing rapidly in line with the development of mathematics education world. Changes that occur in the learning process in the classroom, influenced by the demands according to the development of technology and science also began with a change in views about the nature of mathematics and learning. Changes in views about the trend of the nature of mathematics can encourage changes in the substance of the curriculum. Meanwhile, changes in views about learning mathematics are strongly influenced by the development of learning theories both general and specifically related to learning mathematics. To find out the existence of these changes, an evaluation is needed to measure them. Evaluation can be used to measure low thinking levels and high levels of thinking, but there are evaluations conducted to measure mathematics learning in general, namely TIMMS. Keywords: evaluation, highlevel thinking, lowlevel thinking, TIMSS