Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Legal Protection Regarding Medical Record of Prospective Workers in Job Recruitment Health Test Jafar, Faisal Herisetiawan
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 6 No 1 (2020): L. Research Rev. Q. (February 2020) "Law, Democracy and Crime: How Society Respon
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v6i1.36624

Abstract

Health is essentially one of the supports for the welfare of human life, therefore, in order to create an increase in the degree of health, a law is needed to regulate and foster everything about health. In the process of getting a decent job several agencies or companies apply a health test at the stage of completion of work acceptance. Health checks before work are health checks carried out by doctors before a worker is accepted to do the jobs. Problems arise when the results of a medikal examination or medikal record in the form of a file containing records and documents about the patient's identity, examination, treatment, actions and other services that have been provided to patients out are fully provided to the agency or employer. This type of research is a normative legal research method. Normative legal research means that the existing problems are examined based on existing laws and regulations and the literature relating to the existing problems. Based on the results of the study that the authors describe, it can be concluded that in the implementation of health tests carried out by the agency or company are not allowed to take the results of the medikal record unilaterally without giving access to prospective workers as parties who are the object of examination at the health test.
TINJAUAN HUKUM PEMBERLAKUAN HARGA RAPID TEST ANTIGEN DAN SWAB TEST PCR Faisal Herisetiawan Jafar
Literasi Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Literasi Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Tidar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (186.537 KB)

Abstract

Pada  massa pandemi Covid-19 pemerintah Indonesia telah mengeluarkan surat ederan terkait ambang batas maksimun harga rapid test antigen dan swab test PCR bagi penyelenggara pelayanan kesehatan namun fakta dilapangan didapatkan banyak penyelenggara layanan kesehatan non subsidi pemerintah yang mematok harga yang sangat mahal. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tinjauan hukum terhadap penentuan harga rapid test antigen dan swab test PCR yang diberlakukan oleh penyelenggara pelayanan kesehatan. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian hukum normatif artinya permasalahan yang ada diteliti berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur-literatur yang terkait dengan permasalahan yang ada. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian didapatkan bahwa harga rapid test antigen dan swab test PCR yang tidak sesuai dengan surat edaran pemerintah merupakan penyelewengan asas keadilan dalam Undang-undang Kesehatan dan juga Undang-undang Tenaga Kesehatan yang mengamanatkan bahwa penyelenggaraan kesehatan harus dapat memberikan pelayanan yang adil dan merata kepada semua lapisan masyarakat dengan pembiayaan yang terjangkau. Meski pemerintah Indonesia tidak melarang adanya kegiatan menaikan harga suatu barang menjadi sangat tinggi namun perlu diperhatikan bahwa dalam penyelengaraan layanan kesehatan pihak penyelenggara harus dapat memberikan pelayanan yang adil dan merata kepada semua lapisan masyarakat dengan pembiayaan yang terjangkau
Penerapan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Pada Perjanjian Lisan Antara Nelayan Pemilik Bagang Ikan Teri (PENJUAL) Dengan Pembeli Di Desa Tanggetada, Kecamatan Tanggetada Yeni Haerani; Patma Sari; Irsan Rahman, Ld; Dedihasriadi Dedihasriadi; Basrawi Basrawi; Faisal Herisetiawan Jafar; Ruhul Amin
Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE) Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Januari
Publisher : Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/mude.v2i1.3688

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Application of the Pacta Sunt Servanda Principle in Oral Agreements Between Fishermen Who Have Anchovy Bagang (sellers) and Buyers in Tanggetada Village, Tanggetada District. The formulation of the problem posed, How is the application of the principles of the agreement to the verbal agreement between fishermen who own anchovy bagang and buyers in the village of Tanggetada, Tanggetada sub-district and What are the legal consequences of not applying the principles of the agreement to an oral agreement between fishermen who own anchovy bagang and buyers, Type the study used the Normative-Empirical research method where the results showed that the application of the pacta sunt servanda principle from the buyer was not fulfilled where in the agreement between the seller and the buyer had agreed on a price of 500,000. but the buyer only paid 400,000. so that the buyer violates the agreement that has been made. Legitimate legal consequences based on Article 1388 of the Civil Code, namely all agreements made legally apply as laws to those who make them, an agreement cannot be withdrawn other than by agreement of both parties or for reasons stated by law. , and an agreement must be implemented in good faith. The consequences for buyers who violate the principle of pacta sunt servanda are giving compensation as stipulated in article 1246. an agreement cannot be withdrawn other than by agreement of both parties or for reasons stated by law, and an agreement must be carried out in good faith. The consequences for buyers who violate the principle of pacta sunt servanda are giving compensation as stipulated in article 1246. an agreement cannot be withdrawn other than by agreement of both parties or for reasons stated by law, and an agreement must be carried out in good faith. The consequences for buyers who violate the principle of pacta sunt servanda are giving compensation as stipulated in article 1246.
Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Korupsi Sebagai Wujud Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan Aksan Akbar; La Ode Awal Sakti; Faisal Herisetiawan Jafar
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 8, No 2 (2023): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v8i2.6822

Abstract

This study aims to determine the implementation of criminal law enforcement against perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia today and the application of the concept of restorative justice in the settlement of corruption cases in the future. This research is important to do as input to the legislature in the formation of laws in the future. The type of research used is normative legal research. This research has a novelty value, namely examining the application of the concept of restorative justice in the settlement of cases of corruption to make the principle of justice fast, simple and low cost effective. This research has a focus on the study of the application of the concept of restorative justice in the settlement of corruption cases in realizing a simple, fast and low-cost trial. The results of this study are as follows: First, the enforcement of criminal law for perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia is currently absolutely carried out through the judicial process, meaning that every criminal act of corruption, whether the amount of state financial losses is large or small, must go through a judicial process that ends with a criminal decision. Second, the application of the concept of restorative justice in solving corruption cases in this study only focuses on corruption cases where the loss is relatively small, which is carried out by returning state financial losses, giving fines and carrying out social work for perpetrators which involve perpetrators in their implementation. government and law enforcement officials. The application of the concept of restorative justice in the settlement of cases of corruption in addition to maximizing returns on state financial losses resulting from corruption, is also to reduce the use of state finances which are far greater than the state financial losses resulting from criminal acts of corruption. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui implementasi penegakan hukum pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia saat ini dan penerapan konsep restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi dimasa yang akan datang. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan sebagai masukan kepada pihak legislatif dalam pembetukan hukum dimasa yang akan datang. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian ini mempunyai nilai kebaruan yakni mengkaji penerapan konsep restoratif Justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi untuk mengefektifkan asas peradilan cepat, sederhana dan biaya ringan. Penelitian ini memiliki fokus kajian tentang penerapan konsep restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi dalam mewujudkan peradilan yang sederhana, cepat dan berbiaya ringan. Adapun hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: Pertama, penegakan hukum pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia saat ini mutlak dilakukan melalui proses peradilan artinya setiap tindak pidana korupsi baik yang jumlah kerugian keuangan negara besar maupun kecil harus melewati proses peradilan yang berakhir dengan putusan pemidanaan. Kedua, penerapan konsep restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi dalam penelitian ini hanya memfokuskan perkara tindak pidana korupsi yang nilai kerugiannya terbilang kecil yang dilakukan dengan cara pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara, pemberian denda dan pelaksanaan kerja sosial bagi pelaku yang mana dalam pelaksanaannya melibatkan pelaku, pemerintah dan aparat penegak hukum. Penerapan konsep restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi selain memaksimalkan pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara hasil korupsi, juga untuk mengurangi penggunaan keuangan negara yang jauh lebih besar daripada kerugian keuangan negara yang diakibatkan dari tindak pidana korupsi.  
A Optimizing Intellectual Property as a Fiduciary Security Object After the Issuance of Governmental Regulation No. 24 of 2022 Faisal Herisetiawan Jafar
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 9 No 3 (2023): August
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v9i4.71913

Abstract

The issuance of Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 2022 on the Executory Regulation of Law no. 24 of 2019 on Creative Economy has become a zephyr for creative economy actors with regard to intellectual property-collateralized financing schemes for their businesses. The regulation also further reinforces intellectual property ownership as a standalone fiduciary object that should no longer be viewed as supplementary collateral. This paper aims to study the optimization of governmental regulation on the creative economy with respect to intellectual property-collateralized financing. To this end, a normative legal method was applied by focusing on the secondary data. The research topic was scrutinized following the prevailing regulation and relevant literature. With the issuance of Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 2022 Creative Economy, it further strengthens the ownership status of intellectual property rights as objects of material guarantees. Every citizen, especially creative economy actors, can apply for business capital loans, which can be used as collateral objects and can be classified in the form of intellectual property which must be registered or registered with the Director General of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights. This consequence has an impact on the establishment of an intellectual property appraisal institution that has the task of evaluating intellectual property that will be used as collateral.
Aspek Hukum Keterbukaan Informasi Identitas Pasien Covid-19 FAISAL HERISETIAWAN JAFAR
Sultra Research of Law Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Sultra Research Of Law
Publisher : Pascasarjana Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54297/surel.v2i1.17

Abstract

Pemerintah Indonesia melalui menetapkan penyebaran virus Covid-19 sebagai bencana nasional dengan menerbitkan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Penetapan Bencana Nonalam Penyebaran Corona Virus Disase 2019 (Covid-19) Sebagai Bencana Nasional. Permasalahan terbesar adalah mengenai klaster virus Covid-19 yang masih sangat sulit untuk terdeteksi penyebarannya. Tidak terbacanya contact tracing pasien positive di suatu daerah sangat berbahaya karena akan terus memunculkan kasus klaster terbaru khususnya dari orang-orang yang masuk katagori Pasien Dalam Pengawasan (PDP) ataupun Orang Tanpa gejala (OTG). Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif artinya permasalahan yang ada diteliti berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada dan literatur-literatur yang terkait dengan permasalahan yang ada . Berdasarkan hasil penelitian bahwa Kewajiban pelayanan kesehatan untuk menyimpan rahasia berlaku terhadap setiap orang yang saling mengikatkan diri dalam perjanjian terapeotik, namun atas asas tersebut terdapat pengecualian, yaitu peraturan perundang-undangan, pemberian izin untuk mengungkapkan dari pasien sebagai yang berhak atas rahasia dan konflik kepentingan yang berkaitan dengan perbedaan kewajiban. Sedangkan dalam Undang-undang kesehatan kerahasian informasi data pasien dapat dibuka apabila berhubungan dengan kepentingan publik. Hal ini seharusnya menjadi landasan yang kuat bagi pemerintah untuk segera mengambil kebijakan untuk membuka kerahasian identitas pasien positive Covid-19.
Efektifitas Penerapan Sertifikat HKI sebagai Jaminan Kredit bagi Pelaku Ekonomi Kreatif dan UMKM Faisal Herisetiawan; Patma Sari
Syntax Idea Vol 5 No 12 (2023): Syntax Idea
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In improving the economy in Indonesia, the government is very aggressive in supporting the development of the creative economy, especially SMEs, one of which is by providing financing facilities with guaranteed intellectual property rights certificates. The problem that has occurred to date is that guarantee facilities using intellectual property rights certificates are very rarely implemented, there are many influencing factors such as , banks that apply the precautionary principle and few people use intellectual property rights registration facilities due to lack of information. This research aims to examine the effectiveness of implementing intellectual property rights certificates as collateral for credit financing for creative economy actors and MSMEs. The type of research used in writing is a normative legal research method which emphasizes secondary data. In determining whether a regulation is effective or not in its implementation there are at least five determining factors, namely, legal factors, law enforcement factors, facilities and facilities factors, community factors and cultural factors. The effectiveness of implementing intellectual property rights certificates as debt collateral in Indonesia is still not running well in accordance with what was expected by lawmakers. Regulations regarding intellectual property rights as debt collateral have been around for a long time but in practice it is very difficult to implement.