Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL JUSTIQA

DAMPAK DUALISME KEPENGURUSAN ORGANISASI PERHIMPUNAN ADVOKAT INDONESIA (PERADI) TERHADAP PENEGAKAN HUKUM MASLON HUTABALIAN
JURNAL JUSTIQA Vol 2, No 1 (2020): VOL 2 NO 1 TAHUN 2020
Publisher : Universitas Quality

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In an effort to realize the principles of the rule of law in social and state life, the role and function of an advocate as a free, independent and responsible profession is important, in addition to the judiciary and law enforcement agencies such as the police and prosecutors. Through legal services provided, Advocates carry out their professional duties to uphold justice based on the law for the benefit of justice seekers, including efforts to empower people to realize their fundamental rights before the law. Advocates as one element of the justice system is one of the pillars in upholding the rule of law and human rights. The purpose of this study was conducted to explain the legal management of the Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI) according to the Law, to find out how the dualism of the management of the Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI) on law enforcement and society and how the role and efforts of the government to restore dualism management of the Association Indonesian Advocates (PERADI) became a single, strong organization.This study uses normative and empirical research methods which consist of research on legal observation and research on legal effectiveness. This study uses an interrelated concept of data collection through a qualitative approach and adjusted to applicable regulations.
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PROSEDUR DAN JANGKA WAKTU PENANGANAN PERKARA ATAS LAPORAN POLISI NOMOR STTLP/2298/K/X/2018/SPKT POLRESTA MEDAN BERDASARKAN PERATURAN KAPOLRI NO. 12 TAHUN 2009 MASLON HUTABALIAN
JURNAL JUSTIQA Vol 3, No 2 (2021): VOL 3 NO 2 TAHUN 2021
Publisher : Universitas Quality

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Indonesian National Police Institution is a State institution established based on LawNumber 2 of 2002 which functions as one of the functions of the state government in thefield of maintaining security and public order, law enforcement,protection, shelter, andservice to the community, as stated in Article 2 Law no. 2 of2002. This means thatthe police are fully responsible for providing security and order guarantees to allmembers of the community. In its development and practice, in general, this function hasnot been felt by all people, especially justice seekers who experience legal problems,either directly or indirectly, so that satisfaction with the police services cannot becategorized as adequate.Although in terms of implementation and implementation in thefield, it has been regulated in such a way as the basis or what is called StandardOperating Procedure (SOP) in this case, one of which is related to the Regulation of theNational Police Chief No. 12 of 2009 concerning the supervision and control of thehandling of criminal cases within the Indonesian National Police. This study aims todetermine how the procedure in handling a police report at the investigation level is andhow long the period of time in handling a police report is. This study will explore andlegally analyze the duration of handling a police report associated with the reportNumber STTLP/ 2298/ K/ X/2018/ SPKT Medan Polresta based on the National PoliceChief Regulation No. 12 of 2009 concerning the supervisionand control of the handling ofcriminal cases within the police.This study uses normative and empirical researchmethods consisting of research on legal observations and research on legal effectiveness.This study uses an interrelated concept, namely data collection through a qualitativeapproach and adapted to the applicable regulations. Then the data is selected bycollecting various information about the process of handling a case and the duration ofits handling at the investigation level. This research is expected to have a mandatoryoutput that is planned in the Justiqa Journal of Quality University
FAKTOR- FAKTOR PENYEBAB DAN AKIBAT TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DITINJAU BERDASARKAN UU NO 20 TAHUN 2001 PERUBAHAN ATAS UU NO 31 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Kasus di Kota Medan) Maslon Hutabalian
JURNAL JUSTIQA Vol 1, No 1 (2019): VOL 1 NO 1 TAHUN 2019
Publisher : Universitas Quality

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Crime of corruption is a social phenomenon which is the reality of human behavior in social interactions that are deemed to be deviant, things that are already commonplace, are no longer even common knowledge in the midst of the lives of nations and countries in particular, even throughout the world in general. In the country of Indonesia itself since the days of independence this has become an activity that is attached to stakeholders in the government body in particular, so that when talking about corruption is not a new thing anymore. But along with the times, that this seems to be an unstoppable culture, so it really needs serious attention for the government in terms of eradication. Considering that corruption is a despicable act, it is necessary to see and know what are the causal factors and the consequences of criminal acts of corruption on development in the city of Medan reviewed based on Law No. 20 of 2001 amendment to Law No. 31 Year 1999 concerning corruption. Therefore the author conducted a study in the Medan corruption court which was formed on May 28, 2011 ago.
KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA ATAS PENERBITAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK YANG CACAT HUKUM BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PTUN NO. 10. G/ PTUN. 2019-MDN MASLON HUTABALIAN; MARIA FERBA ADITYA
JURNAL JUSTIQA Vol 4, No 1 (2022): VOL 4 NO 1 TAHUN 2022
Publisher : Universitas Quality

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law is a tool in a country to regulate the joints of state life such as life between one legal subject and another legal subject, both in Public Law and Private Law. This research was conducted to answer the problem, namely how to study the law of a state administrative decision that is legally flawed, the case study of PTUN No.10/G/2019/PTUN-MDN and how is the legal responsibility of state administrative officials for a decision that is legally flawed. By using descriptive normative research method consisting of research on legal observations and research on legal effectiveness. The results of this study state that a state administrative decision that is legally flawed such as a SHM with legal defects, both physical and juridical data should not occur due to negligence or intentional negligence of state administrative officials, because such problems cause conflicts and losses in the community, also have lost trust. the public towards government services and the actions of state administrative officials who are negligent or intentionally commit unlawful acts in this case issuing a certificate of ownership of a plot of land that is not based on the applicable laws and regulations, then the official, both on his position and personally, can be held accountable at the before the law and can be prosecuted criminally or civilly