Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MERCATORIA

Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama setelah Perceraian dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia Elfirda Ade Putri; Windy Sri Wahyuni
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol 14, No 2 (2021): JURNAL MERCATORIA DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v14i2.5692

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan membahas tentang penyelesaian sengketa harta bersama setelah perceraian dalam hukum positif di Indonesia. Masalah difokuskan pada pembagian harta bersama setelah perceraian anatar suami istri. Guna mendekati masalah ini dipergunakan teori perlindungan hukum dan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Data-data dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan dan peraturan perundang-undanngan yang berlaku dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa harta bersama setelah perceraian biasanya dibagi rata (50%) antara suami dan istri. Hal ini berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 128 KUHPerdata, Undang-undang Perkawinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, serta sejalan dengan Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung RI No. 424.K/Sip.1959. Sementara itu, harta yang diwarisi dan diperoleh masing-masing pihak sebelum terjadinya perkawinan, menjadi milik pribadi mereka sendiri.
Penerapan Hukum Materil terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan dengan Unsur Penyertaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Mari No. 966 k/pid/2014) Elfirda Ade Putri
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol 13, No 1 (2020): JURNAL MERCATORIA JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (885.748 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v13i1.3124

Abstract

Murder accompanied by inclusion or carried out jointly is a special form of murder that incriminates the perpetrators. Basically, judges 'considerations in deciding cases, especially with murder cases, are sometimes not in accordance with applicable law, apart from that the sentence imposed is sometimes not in accordance with the perpetrators' actions, so that justice is not obtained, especially for the injured parties. There are differences in sentencing in each court, even though prior to sentencing, the judge has considered the same juridical considerations from each court level, whether it consists of indictments of the public prosecutor, defendant's statements, witness statements, witness statements, evidence and articles of law criminal. The application of material law by the Public Prosecutor in the Supreme Court Decision number 966 K / Pid / 2014 is not right. The public prosecutor uses the subsidair indictment using Article 338 paragraph (1) jo Article 55 of the Criminal Code. Public prosecutor did not ensnare the defendant Article Number 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, where the criminal act committed by the defendant contained an element of "planning".