Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.066
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Jambura Law Review KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Hukum Sasana Abdi Bhara
Gede Aditya Pratama
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Hilangnya Tes Insolvensi sebagai Syarat Kepailitan di Indonesia Gede Aditya Pratama
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 15 No. 1 (2021): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: JUNE 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v15i1.450

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan tes insolvensi yang hilang dalam syarat-syarat kepailitan di Indonesia. Pengaturan mengenai syarat kepailitan diatur dalam peraturan perundangan-undangan di Indonesia yang berubah dari waktu ke waktu. Hingga diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, tes insolvensi masih belum dijadikan sebagai syarat kepailitan untuk menentukan apakah debitur dapat dipailitkan atau tidak. Debitur dapat dinyatakan pailit cukup dengan dibuktikan bahwa debitur tersebut mempunyai 2 (dua) kreditor atau lebih, tidak membayar sedikitnya 1 (satu) utang, dan utang tersebut telah jatuh waktu dan dapat ditagih. Dalam menjelaskan mengenai tes insolvensi yang hilang dalam syarat kepailitan, artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang dikumpulkan dengan studi dokumen atau bahan pustaka. Artikel ini menjelaskan bahwa hilangnya tes insolvensi dalam syarat kepailitan di Indonesia dapat mengakibatkan suatu perusahaan/debitur yang sebenarnya berkinerja keuangan baik dapat dipailitkan. Hal ini dikarenakan syarat kepailitan di Indonesia tidak mempertimbangkan tentang kemampuan debitur dalam membayar utangnya. Sehingga debitur yang mempunyai aset besar dapat dipailitkan oleh kreditur yang hanya mempunyai tuntutan utang yang relatif kecil/sedikit.
Legal Protection of Rohingya Citizens Related to The Conflict in Myanmar Elfirda Ade Putri; Windy Sri Wahyuni; Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra; Agata Jacqueline Paramesvari; Gede Aditya Pratama
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 5 NO. 1 JANUARY 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.964 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v5i1.16722

Abstract

There are many crimes against humanity cases that occurred in the world. One of them is happened in Myanmar, which is Rohingya ethnic conflict. Rohingya ethnic conflict is an issue based on discrimination to Rohingya ethnic because there are some differences at ethnic and religion. Ethnic Rohingya is not recognized by Myanmar and not granted a status of citizenship Based on Myanmar Citizenship Law (Burma Citizenship Law 1982). This research was conducted to find out how the legal forms to Rohingya citizens based on international law. This methodology is a normative legal research that uses statutes, case, fact approaches. The research found that the role of UNHCR in handling Rohingya cases has been mandated by the United Nations and in accordance with UNHCR Statute. UNHCR plays an important role in addressing the issue of Rohingya case, at leas as initiator, facilitator, conciliator, and determination. Such roles were taken to resolve the conflict that face by Rohingya ethnic, like provide protection, safety, and facilitate every Rohingyas refugees needs. In addition to the role of UNHCR, some countries such as Indonesia, Thailand and Canada also provided some arrangement in addressing the issue of Rohingya.
LEGAL REMEDIES AGAINST BANKRUPTCY DECISION FOLLOWING CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NO. 23/PUU-XIX/2021 Gede Aditya Pratama; Nina Zainab; Heru Siswanto
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 7 Number 2 Maret 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.1060

Abstract

Bankruptcy is a legal institution created as a way out of debt problems that befall debtors. The bankruptcy mechanism consists of the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang/PKPU) and bankruptcy itself. These two mechanisms have different legal consequences, especially regarding the available legal remedies, which differ between bankruptcy rulings originating from PKPU applications and those originating from bankruptcy applications. The available legal remedies also differ between bankruptcy rulings originating from applications submitted by debtors and those submitted by creditors. Constitutional Court Decision No. 23/PUU-XIX/2021 has changed the legal remedies provisions in Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. Prior to the Constitutional Court's decision, there was no opportunity for debtors to file legal remedies against a bankruptcy ruling caused by the rejection of a peace agreement due to the failure to reach an agreement in the PKPU process. However, after the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 23/PUU-XIX/2021, this has changed with the opening of the opportunity for legal remedies in the form of cassation against a bankruptcy ruling due to the rejection of a peace agreement because an agreement was not reached in the PKPU process. It is important to avoid the PKPU process being used as a means to bankrupt debtors who are still solvent but are bankrupted because there are interests of business competition involved.
Evaluation of The Fulfillment of The Defendant's Rights in Online Criminal Proceedings in Indonesia Gede Aditya Pratama
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v9i1.2268

Abstract

In early 2020, Indonesia was hit by the Corona Virus that affect all aspects in public live including affect judicial institutions. Criminal proceedings that supposed to be held in a trial that open to the public according to the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, must be held online in which judges, prosecutor, lawyer, and the defendant are in separate places. Even though, the Indonesian Supreme Court have enacted Circular Letter No. 1 Year 2020 to regulate the proceedings during the Covid-19 pandemic, many criticisms for the course of online trials especially regarding the rights of the defendants, which were violated during the online trial. The rights of the defendant who were violated during the online criminal trial were the right to be heard equally, right to consult with a lawyer during the proceedings of the case, right to be tried without undue delay, and right to present witnesses and experts and ask questions to these witnesses and experts. These rights, that was feared violated because the defendant could not attend the trial in person. This research was conducted to explain the course of the online criminal proceeding to assess whether the defendant’s rights had been fulfilled during the online trial.
EDUKASI HUKUM PENDAFTARAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN MEREK DAGANG, PATEN, DESAIN INDUSTRI BAGI KARYAWAN DIVISI HUKUM PT. GLOBAL JET E-COMMERCE Gede Aditya Pratama; Adi Nur Rohman
Abdi Bhara Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/abhara.v2i1.2204

Abstract

Kekayaan Intelektual adalah hak yang timbul dari hasil olah pikir yang menghasilkan suatu produk atau proses yang berguna untuk manusia. Pada intinya kekayaan intelektual adalah hak untuk menikmati secara ekonomis hasil dari suatu kreativitas intelektual. HKI terdiri dari berbagai hak di antaranya hak cipta, merek, paten, desain industri, dan rahasia dagang. Penyuluhan hukum akan pentingnya HKI ini disampaikan kepada karyawan-karyawan divisi hukum PT. Global Jet E-Commerce. Penyuluhan ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan hukum para karyawan divisi hukum terkait proses pendaftaran dan perlindungan merek dagang, desain industry dan sebagainya. Setelah penyuluhan hukum dilakukan, peserta memahami bahwa merek dagang, desain industry merupakan kekayaan intelektual yang harus dijaga dan dilindungi. Selain itu, peserta juga memahami bahwa proses pendaftaran kekayaan intelektual dilakukan dengan terlebih dahulu melakukan pemeriksaan merek terdaftar untuk meminimalisir penolakan pendaftaran merek.
Co-Authors Adi Nur Rohman Agata Jacqueline Paramesvari Elfirda Ade Putri Heru Siswanto Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra Nina Zainab Windy Sri Wahyuni