Agung Sujati Winata
Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Investor Asing Dalam Kegiatan Penanaman Modal Asing Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Negara Agung Sujati Winata
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v2i2.902

Abstract

Legal protection provided by the state to investors is one of the considerations for foreign investors before investing in a country. This study aims to find out and analyze the legal protection of foreign investment in Indonesian law and implications itself. This research is a descriptive study, which analyzes and describes systematically, factually, and accurately the provisions relating to legal protection against foreign investment in Indonesia. Based on the results of the study, it is known that legal protection against foreign investment in Indonesian law is regulated in the Investment Law. This law has provided adequate protection for foreign investors for a variety of risks including non-commercial risks in foreign investment in Indonesia. Providing the widest opportunity for foreign investors to invest their capital in Indonesia has encouraged many foreign investors to invest in Indonesia.Keywords: Investor, Investment, Legal Protection.
Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Karen Agustiawan Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah; Dwidja Priyatno; Agung Sujati Winata; Khairul Hidayat
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 7, No 1 (2022): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v7i1.4922

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis penerapan business judgment rule dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi Karen Agustiawan. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan jenis yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan penerapan doktrin business judgment rule dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi Karen Agustiawan terjadi pada tingkat pemeriksaan di Mahkamah Agung (judex juris). Dalam pertimbangannya, apa yang dilakukan oleh Karen Agustiawan tidak keluar dari ranah business judgment rule, ditandai dengan tidak adanya kecurangan (fraud), benturan kepentingan (conflict of interest), perbuatan melawan hukum, dan kesalahan yang disengaja.  This study aims to examine and analyze the application of the business judgment rule in the corruption case of Karen Agustiawan. This research is descriptive with normative juridical type. The approach used is the approach laws and regulations (statute approach) and case approach using secondary data which was analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study show the application of the business judgment rule doctrine in the corruption case of Karen Agustiawan occurred at the examination level at the Supreme Court (judex juris). In her judgment, what Karen Agustiawan did was not outside the realm of the business judgment rule, marked by the absence of fraud, conflict of interest, unlawful acts, and intentional mistakes. 
Legal Review of the Late Notification of Acquisition of Commission for Supervision of Business Competition (Study of KPPU Case Decision No: 07/KPPU-M/2018) Hari Sutra Disemadi; Agung Sujati Winata
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The form of economic activity carried out by entrepreneurs is the acquisition of shares. Takeover is a way of developing an existing company or saving a company that is experiencing capital shortages or difficulties. One of the companies that made the acquisition was PT Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk. The company that has been acquired is PT. Prima Top Boga on January 24, 2018. The type of legal research used is legal research which is included in the normative legal research typology where this study focuses on positive legal norms in the form of legislation. The purpose of this study is to find out the legal analysis of the delay in notification (acquisition) of PT. Prima Top Boga by PT. Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk., to KPPU and knows the stages of notification and evaluation of MPU for the acquisition of a company. The results of this study show, PT. Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk., Has been proven to be slow in notifying acquisition of KPPU as stipulated in Law No. 5 of 1999 jo. Government Regulation No. 57 of 2010. Business actors wishing to make notifications regarding acquisitions that result in assets and/or sales value exceeding the stipulated provisions are required to carry out consultations as well as notifications according to the stages available.
KETIDAKPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS INTERNASIONAL MELALUI ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA Agung Sujati Winata
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v3i1.120

Abstract

In business activities, one of the considerations for international business partners is the legal certainty of a country. This study aims to analyze the causes of legal uncertainty in settlement of international business disputes through international arbitration in Indonesia. This research is descriptive of the type of normative legal research. The data used to examine the issues under study include regulations related to legal certainty in settlement of disputes through international arbitration and secondary legal materials in the form of scientific works and the results of research by legal experts, especially those related to international arbitration. The approach used is a statutory approach, especially the AAPS Law. Data was collected through a literature study, then analyzed qualitatively. The findings of this study are that legal uncertainty in settlement of disputes through international arbitration occurs due to inconsistencies in implementing the provisions of the AAPS Law, particularly concerning the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards. In addition, there are no clear limits on violations of public order as a condition for international arbitral awards to be implemented in Indonesia