Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama untuk Pemberdayaan Justitia Kodifikasia: Jurnal Penelitian Islam Musawa : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender
Layyin Mahfiana
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Media Sebagai Pelestari Budaya Patriarkhi Mahfiana, Layyin
Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol. 5 No. 4 (2007)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & The Asia Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/musawa.2007.54.483-495

Abstract

There are two main arguments advanced in this article. Firstly, regarding the image of women perpetuated lry mass media, and secondly why media is not showing gender sensitivity when developing women images. In general mass media portray women in one amongst these five images: women image as a frame, as a column, as an available 'bed', as a saucer and an image of friendship. These images are developed and became popular within a patriarchal culture because men define women as such, and women have no power to disagree. The author proposes that today's women readers must apply more critical view in reading and analyzing the content of mass media, especially with regard to women's images.
Quo Vadis Constitutional Complaint in Indonesia: Authority and Discretion of Constitutional Judges/Quo Vadis Constitusional Complaint di Indonesia: Antara Kewenangan dan Diskresi Hakim Konstitusi Mahfiana, Layyin; Lisma, Lisma
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 13, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v13i1.11574

Abstract

AbstractThe guarantee of citizens' constitutional rights is one of the conditions for realizing an excellent legal state. However, several studies show that there is no precise mechanism for filing constitutional complaints. Although since 2003, a Constitutional Court has been established. This article aims to describe the problems of filing a constitutional complaint in Indonesia. This article is based on doctrinal legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that there is no regulation that authorizes the handling of constitutional complaint cases to the Constitutional Court. Judges of the Constitutional Court are rigid in examining cases under their authority and have never exercised discretion over them. This condition has the potential to ignore the constitutional rights of citizens. So there is a need for an amendment to the 1945 Constitution and a revision to the Constitutional Court Law. However, this change requires political will from the authorities.Keywords: constitusional complaint; constitutional court; discretion.Abstrak Jaminan hak konstitusi warga negara merupakan salah satu syarat terwujudnya negara hukum yang baik. Namun, sejumlah riset menunjukkan bahwa belum ada mekanisme yang jelas pengajuan constitutional complain. Meskipun sejak tahun 2003 telah dibentuk Mahkamah Konsititusi. Artikel ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan problematika pengajuan constitutional complain di Indonesia. Artikel ini berdasarkan penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa belum ada regulasi yang memberikan kewenangan penanganan perkara constitutional complaint kepada Mahkamah Konsitusi. Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi rigid dalam memeriksa perkara yang menjadi kewenangannya dan tidak pernah melakukan diskresi terhadapnya. Kondisi ini berpotensi mengabaikan hak-hak konstitusi warga negara. Sehingga perlu adanya amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 dan revisi terhadap Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Namun, perubahan ini membutuhkan political will dari penguasa.Kata Kunci: constitutional complaint; mahkamah konstitusi; diskresi.
Efektivitas Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) Zaidah Nur Rosidah; Layyin Mahfiana
TAWAZUN : Journal of Sharia Economic Law Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law
Publisher : Sharia Faculty Islamic Economic Law Study Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/tawazun.v3i1.7529

Abstract

This study aims to determine the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in the National Sharia Arbitration Agency (Basyarnas). This study uses a method of socio legal study, how sharia principles are applied in resolving sharia economic disputes so that they can provide justice for both parties. Secondary data collection is carried out through a literature study of primary legal materials and secondary legal material. Some data was requested for confirmation from the National Sharia Arbitration Agency (Basyarnas) in the Yogyakarta region. To obtain answers to the research problems, 3 activities were carried out simultaneously, namely data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing / syllogistic verification of deduction. The results of the research and discussion obtained several conclusions, namely first, Islamic principles have not been maximally implemented by Basyarnas, this can be seen from the basis of the consideration of Basyarnas law in its decision. Basyarnas should also correct in terms of the contract, whether it is in accordance with sharia principles or not so that the arising of the dispute is not solely due to the default of the customer but can also be caused by incompatibility with sharia principles. Second, according to Antony Allot's theory of legal effectiveness, the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution has not been carried out in accordance with sharia principles, this is due to the lack of clarity in the case in Basyarnas' decision.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP TERSANGKA ANAK SEBAGAI UPAYA MELINDUNGI HAK ANAK Layyin Mahfiana
Muwazah Vol 3 No 1 (2011)
Publisher : UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/muwazah.v3i1.12

Abstract

Abstract: Any activities conducted within. Juvenile justice process, should be based on a principle, for the welfare, interests and future. front of them, of course, without, reducing attention to the interests of society. So when the child becomes a suspect protection is needed, which not only juridical but also non-juridical, which includes protection in the social, health, and education. It dimaksdukan to ensure children's rights as the nation's future generations.
Co-Authors Lisma Lisma, Lisma Winarto Winarto Zaidah Nur Rosidah