Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.383
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Nasional Komputasi dan Teknologi Informasi SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling Systematics Jurnal PkM (Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi Mahasiswa Informatika (JRAMI)
Risma Nurul Auliya
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan)

 1 
Eksperimentasi TAPPS dan GI terhadap Pengetahuan dan Sikap Sosial Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu; Nur Alamsyah; Risma Nurul Auliya; Luh Putu Widya Adnyani
SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) Vol 6, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (593.674 KB) | DOI: 10.30998/sap.v6i1.9901

Abstract

Education is faced with multi-dimensional problems, including the low competence of mathematical knowledge and the crisis of social aspects. This study aims to determine the difference in the effect of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS), Group Investigation (GI), and Conventional models on knowledge competence and social attitudes in terms of learning styles. This is a quasi-experimental research, with a population of all eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 24 Jakarta. Hypothesis testing used two-way multivariate analysis with unequal cells. The results of the research included: (1) TAPPS produced knowledge competence better than GI and conventional, and GI was better than conventional, (2) TAPPS and GI produced the same social attitudes, and both were better than conventional, (3) visual and auditorial resulted in the same good knowledge competence, and both were better than kinesthetic, (4) visual and auditory produced the same good social attitudes, and both were better than kinesthetic, (5) TAPPS and GI, knowledge competence of the three learning styles were equally good, whereas conventionally there were differences, (6) TAPPS and GI, social attitudes of the three types of learning styles were equally good, while conventionally there were differences, (7) in visual and auditory, knowledge competence of the three models were the same, while there were differences in kinesthetic, and (8) in visual and auditory, the social attitudes of the three models were the same, while there were differences in kinesthetic.
Co-Authors Aditya Setiawan Agung Prabowo Dede Sutanto Dwi Dani Apriyani Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu Frasdica Fujianto Nugraha KUSTIAN, NUNU Luh Putu Widya Adnyani Luh Putu Widya Adnyani Nur Alamsyah Reza Avrizal Selli Mariko