Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Varia Justicia Jambura Law Review Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam
Ahmad Rustan Syamsuddin
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pembuktian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Ahmad Rustan Syamsuddin
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 2 NO. 2 JULY 2020
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (792.752 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5942

Abstract

Korupsi pada sektor pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah semakin meningkat dari tahun ke tahun baik dari segi jumlah kasusnya maupun dari segi nilai kerugian negara yang ditimbulkan. Korupsi dalam proses pengadaan barang dan jasa pada umumnya terjadi karena adanya penyalahgunaan wewenang dari penyelenggara negara yang terlibat dalam proses pengadaan mulai dari perencanaan sampai pada diterimanya barang dan jasa oleh Penggguna Anggaran (PA) atau Kuasa Pengguna Anggaran (KPA). Pada umumnya terpidana kasus korupsi pada sektor pengadaan didakwa dengan menggunakan Pasal 3 jo Pasal 18 ayat (1) huruf b Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Salah satu unsur yang wajib dibuktikan oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum pada persidangan adalah unsur penyalahgunaan wewenang disamping unsur yang lain juga perlu dibuktikan khususnya berkenaan dengan unsur adanya kerugian negara secara nyata. Dengan berlakunya Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, terdapat disharmonisasi perundang-undangan terkait kompetensi dan prosedur pembuktian penyalahgunaan wewenang.
Maladministration on Mining Business Licenses: Case Study “Mining Business License Production Operation PT. Aneka Tambang, Tbk.” Ahmad Rustan; Ju Lan Hsieh; Wahyudi Umar
Varia Justicia Vol 17 No 3 (2021): Vol 17 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/variajusticia.v17i3.6265

Abstract

As a potential natural wealth, mining sectors should be managed with proper rules. Therefore, control instruments are needed in the form of mining business licenses to prevent the negative impact of mining management. At the stage of production operations, the requirements that must be met by businesses are administrative, technical, environmental, and financial. This paper aims to describe maladministration in the issuance of mining business license process especially on upgrading process of exploration permits to production operating permits. This research is a normative juridical research with statute approach and case approach. The results showed that the issuance of mining business license production operation (IUP OP) of PT. Aneka Tambang, Tbk based on the Decree of the Regent of North Konawe No. 158 of 2010 does not meet the technical requirements, especially regionally because the IUP is overlapping 11 other IUP with the same commodity, and there is an IUP OP area which not a part of the exploration area.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Review Hasil Pemilihan Penyedia dalam Pengadaan Barang atau Jasa oleh Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen Elsha Ersanda; Ahmad Rustan; Irwansyah Irwansyah; Wahyudi Umar
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 5 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3653

Abstract

The role of the Commitment Making Officer (PPK) is very important to ensure procurement objectives are achieved by reviewing the results of the selection of government procurement of goods and services so that the entire procurement process is carried out transparently, fairly and in accordance with applicable regulations. This research aims to analyze whether the process of reviewing election results in procurement process No. 15117081 carried out by PPK Southeast Sulawesi has complied with the principles of transparency, accountability and fairness in selecting tender winners based on LKPP Regulation No. 12 of 2021. The research method used is a legal research method with a statutory approach and case study. The results of the research show that the implementation of the review by the PPK in the aquo case is not in accordance with the provisions of LKPP regulation No.12 of 2021. The review should be carried out by the PKK only based on the Minutes of Election Results (BAHP) documents received, not providing field evidence or clarification to participants or other parties. The implication of these findings is that there is a potential violation of the principles of government procurement of goods and services which must be carried out transparently, fairly and in accordance with regulations.
Co-Authors Elsha Ersanda Irwansyah Irwansyah Ju Lan Hsieh Wahyudi Umar