Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Jurnalisa : Jurnal Jurusan Jurnalistik

FRAMING BERITA PENISTAAN AGAMA M. KECE DALAM PORTAL BERITA KOMPAS.COM EDISI AGUSTUS 2021 Mukhlisa Setiabudi; Muliadi Mau; Tuti Bahfiarti
Jurnal Jurnalisa: Jurnal Jurusan Jurnalistik Vol 8 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurnalisa.v8i1.26735

Abstract

Blasphemy cases are no longer a new case in a country with a pluralistic society like Indonesia. The blasphemy case by M. Kece is the latest case that has caught the public's attention. M. Kece is known to have committed acts of hate speech and insults to the Prophet Muhammad and Islam. This case then did not miss the attention of the media as Kompas.com also highlighted this case in absolutely a different way and construction. For this reason, this study discusses framing analysis with the Robert N. Entman model which consists of four points of analysis, namely defining of problem, diagnosing causes, making a moral judgment, and treatment recommendations on the Kompas.com news portal related to M. Kece's cause. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with a constructionist approach to framing analysis. The results of this study concluded that Kompas.com tried to convey M. Kace's reporting accurately with subtle narrations so as not to tarnish the image of M. Kece because he was considered an ordinary YouTuber.
STUDENT CRITICISM TO JOKOWI'S POLICY : (Critical Discourse Analysis on Uploads of BEM UI 2021 on Instagram) najamuddin; Hafied Cangara; Muliadi Mau
Jurnal Jurnalisa: Jurnal Jurusan Jurnalistik Vol 8 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurnalisa.v8i2.31362

Abstract

This study aims to analyze critical text messages of BEM UI 2021 students on Instagram social media. The primary data in this study is the upload of the @bemuiĀ¬_official account entitled the king of lip service. This research uses the analysis method of Teun A Vand Dijk. The results of this study found that the discourse of the king of lip service was a student criticism movement for Jokowi's policies that were not realized. The nickname is a form of criticism of Jokowi's promise about. First, Jokowi's statement to long for demonstrations, but various demonstrations actually get repression. Second, Jokowi wants to revise the ITE Law, but it has resulted in the proposal of a new article. Third, Jokowi wants to strengthen the KPK which actually ends in indications of weakness. Fourth, Jokowi allowed the Omnibus Law to be sued at the Constitutional Court (MK), but contradicted Airlangga Hartarto's statement to the Constitutional Court to reject all claims against the Job Creation Law. Meanwhile, the use of social media Instagram in the student criticism movement is an alternative means to fight the discourse from the government and mobilize the student movement. Another finding is the reason why students criticize the government. First, students have a special identity, so from that identity there is a moral burden to criticize the government. Second, students have anxiety about their uncertain future. Finally, they expressed their anxiety through criticism on social media and street demonstrations, in the hope that social change would occur. Third, students have the burden of history that was obtained from the previous generation of students.
Opini Publik Kasus Korupsi Nurdin Abdullah di Kanal Youtube KPK RI Badrul Aeni Sultan; Hasrullah; Muliadi Mau
Jurnal Jurnalisa: Jurnal Jurusan Jurnalistik Vol 9 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurnalisa.v9i1.35470

Abstract

The arrest of Nurdin Abdullah, who is the Governor of South Sulawesi Province for the 2018-2023 period by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) of the Republic of Indonesia, has brought public opinion to the public. This is because Nurdin Abdullah is one of the outstanding regional heads in Indonesia, he was the recipient of the Bung Hatta Anti-Corruption Award (BHACA) in 2017. The Bantaeng Regent for the 2008-2018 period was forgotten to commit various violations in administering the government in South Sulawesi Province. In various corruption cases, the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission in every legal process always uses YouTube as a publication. Youtube as a mass media opens space for the public to comment on issues, this is supported by the presence of new media theories. Therefore, researchers are interested in examining this problem with the formulation of the problem, how is the public opinion of Nurdin Abdullah's corruption on the KPK RI youtube channel, where the research is an entire commentary that made 379 comments, with quantitative methods. The results of the study show that the tendency of public opinion towards the Nurdin Abdullah case is positive comments with a presentation of 44.9%, negative 36.9%, and neutral 18.2%, with the most comments topics focused on corruption cases with a presentation of 52.2%. which was then followed by a discussion about the persona of Nurdin Abdullah 35.1%.