Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Heni Septi Rahayu; Budiyono Budiyono; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10058

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models TSI, TPS, and direct learning model on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students logical mathematical intelligence. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with factorial design. The population were the eighth-grade students of junior high schools in Klaten Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unbalanced cell. Based on the hypothesis, it was concluded as follows. 1) The mathematics learning achievement of TSI was better than TPS and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of TPS was better than direct learning model. 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with high logical mathematics was better than the students with average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematics was better than the students with low logical mathematics. 3) The students with high logical mathematics who were treated by TSI, TPS, direct learning models had the same mathematics learning achievement, students with low logical mathematics treated with TPS and TSI has the same result for both models and was better direct learning model, the students who were treated by TPS learning model was better than direct learning model, the students with low logical mathematics who were treated by TSI was same as TPS and was better than direct learning model. 4) In TSI learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of students with high logical mathematic was better than the students with both average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematic was better than students with low logical mathematics, in TPS learning model, the students with high logical mathematics was same as the achievement of students with average logical mathematics and was better than the students with low logical mathematic, in direct learning model, the students with high logical mathematics was better than the students with average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematics was same as the students with low logical mathematics.Keywords: Three Steps Interview, Think Pair Share Direct Learning Model, Logical Mathematical Intelligence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK (TSTS-PS) DAN TIPE TEAMS ASSISTED INDIVIDULIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK (TAI-PS) PADA MATERI HIMPUNAN DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA Ratnasari Ratnasari; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i1.10016

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among cooperative learning models of TSTS with scientific approach (TSTS-PS), TAI with scientific approach (TAI-PS) or classical with scientific approach one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ anxiety categories, students having high, middle or low categories giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ anxiety categories in giving mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each anxiety categories, which one is better among TSTS with scientific approach (TSTS-PS), TAI with scientific approach (TAI-PS) or classical with scientific approach in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all grade VII students of Junior High School (SMP) in Karanganyar Regency. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of students’ anxiety categories. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It shows that three classes have balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows. (1) The TSTS-PS had better learning achievement than the TAI-PS and classical with scientific approach. TAI-PS had learning achievement as good as the classical with scientific approach, (2) The students having low anxiety categories had better learning achievement than those having middle and high categories. The students having middle anxiety categories had learning achievement as good as those having high categories. (3) In each learning models, the students having low anxiety categories had better learning achievement than those having middle and high categories. The students having middle anxiety categories had learning achievement as good as those having high categories. (4) In each of students’ anxiety categories, the TSTS with scientific approach had better learning achievement than the TAI and classical with scientific approach. TAI with scientific approach had learning achievement as good as the classical with scientific approach.Keywords : Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Teams Assisted Individulization (TAI), Classical, Scientific Approach, Students’ Anxiety.

PROSES BERPIKIR MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PEMBUKTIAN TAHUN AKADEMIK 2014/2015 Dian Devita Yohanie; Imam Sujadi; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10048

Abstract: This research aimed to describe the thinking process in proof problem solving using direct, contraposition, and contradiction methods in 2nd semester mathematic education students of Nusantara PGRI University of Kediri with (1) high, (2) moderate, and (3) low learning achievements. The research method employed was qualitative approach. Subject of research was selected using purposive sampling technique, consisting of 6 2nd-semester mathematic education students: 2 students with high, 2 with moderate, and 2 with low learning achievements. Data collection was carried out using interview based on proof problem solving assignment. Data validation was carried out using time triangulation, and the valid data was analyzed using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The result of research showed that: (1) The thinking process of students with high learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise correctly and completely, did algebraic operation to connect consequence to premise, in order to prove the consequence. In review phase, the subjects check their answer and were sure with their answer after seeing the process and proof result. (2) The thinking process of students with moderate learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct, contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise correctly, did algebraic operation with summing procedure and distributive property to connect consequence to premise in order to prove the consequence. In review phase, the subjects did not check their answer and were sure with their answer when their proved. (3) The thinking process of students with low learning achievement. The proof problem solving in direct, contraposition, and contradiction ways. In entry phase is the same, the subjects understood the problem by writing antecedent as they know and consequence to be proved. In finishing phase, the subjects explained antecedent into premise difficultly, did algebraic operation with summing procedure and distributive property to connect consequence to premise using number example, thereby could not prove the consequence. Then in review phase, the subjects did not check their answer and were sure with their answer after seeing their proof result.Keywords: Thinking Process, Problem Solving, Proof, Learning Achievement

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS (TGT) YANG DIMODIFIKASI DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AFL) PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK TEKNIK DI KABUPATEN MADIUN Suryanto Suryanto; Budi Usodo; Mardiyana Mardiyana
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20250

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from creativity of the student. The learning models compared were Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) The Modified By Assessment For Learning (AfL), Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) an direct model. This research is a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research is all class 11th student of Vocational High School in Madiun. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling of the sample totaled 266 students, with details of 87 students in the experimental class of 90 students in two experimental classes and 89 students in the control class. The instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and test creativity in learning. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unequal cells. The results of research showed that: (1) The model of cooperative learning TGT modified AfL provides mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model TGT and direct learning. TGT cooperative learning model provides mathematics learning achievement as well as direct learning model; (2) Students who have a high learning creativity gives better mathematics learning achievement than students who have studied creativity medium and low. Students who have studied creativity is giving mathematics learning achievement as well as students with low learning creativity; (3) For each learning model show that, the prestige mathematics students with high creativity learning are better than the student who have medium or low, and students who have the creativity learning is giving better mathematics learning achievement than students with low learning creativity. (4) For each students' level of creativity show that, cooperative learning model TGT modified AfL provides mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model TGT and direct learning. TGT cooperative learning model provides better mathematics learning achievement than direct learning model.Keywords: cooperative learning, TGT modified AfL, TGT, creativity in learning, academic achievement.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN TIPE ROUNDTABLE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Yolan Kusumaningtyas; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10028

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from emotional intelligence of the students. The learning models compared were learning model of the Numbered Head Together (NHT) with scientific approach, Roundtable with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VIII students of Public Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and emotional intelligence questionnaire. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANOVA with unequal cell. Based on hypothesis, the results of the study concluded as follows. (1) Roundtable model with scientific approach got better learning achievement than NHT model with scientific approach and with classical model with scientific approach, NHT model with scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical model with scientific approach. (2) Students with high emotional intelligence gave the same learning achievement with the students who had middle emotional intelligence. In addition, students who had high and middle emotional intelligence have better learning achievement than students who had low emotional intelligence. (3) In each learning models, student with high emotional intelligence gave the same learning achievement with the students who had middle emotional intelligence, then students who had high and middle emotional intelligence have better learning achievement than students who had low emotional intelligence. (4) In each category of emotional intelligence, Roundtable model with scientific approach got better learning achievement than NHT with scientific approach and classical model with scientific approach, NHT model with scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical model with scientific approach.Keywords : Numbered Head Together (NHT), Roundtable, Classical, Scientific Approach, Emotional Intelligence.

PENERAPAN STRATEGI ARCS DENGAN PEMBERIAN SCAFFOLDING : UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIKA DAN PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH MATEMATIKA DASAR Henny Ekana Chrisnawati; Budi Usodo; Ira Kurniawati; Yemi Kuswardi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10018

ABSTRACT This research has purposes to increase mathematical understanding ability and build character of undergraduate in mathematics foundation which uses ARCS’s strategy with giving scaffolding. Mathematics foundation which has abstract’s characteristic and necessary from understanding ability both computational also fungtional become priority of researcher’s thought. Characteristic of mathematical concept which is pyramidal compel students to understanding basic concept correctly for the sake of understanding new concept. Not only for understanding but also building character is one of affectionate factors priority to reach success in learning mathematics. Pay attention of developing character, undergraduate are wished to show positively character in learning so that gives positively implication to the results. This research is classroom activity research which gives some informations about the changes or increase that ae caused by an activity. This research uses undergraduate of physics education in year academic 2015/2016 as a subject. Technique of collecting data uses test and observation while learning and research’s instrument is developed by validation of professional judgment. The result from application of ARCS’s strategy with giving scaffolding in learning is exist an increase of mathematical understanding ability. It showed by the results of mathematical understanding ability’s test in first and second cycle which gave information that there exist an increase of completeness percentage for understanding mathematical concept which from 39, 5 % up to 77,4 % in first cycle then continued up to 82,6 % in second cycle. Like that, it also showed by the mean of the test’s result which gave an increase from 61 in first cycle up to 81,1 in second cycle. The application of ARCS’s strategy also increased the affectionate learning’s result. It showed by the results of observation in first and second cycle which showed that the mean percentage of character building from indicators: honest, discipline, hardworking, creative, stand alone, has a curiosity, appreciate achievement, friendly, responsible which were developed. Those results increase from bottom category in pre-cycle became in middle and high category in second cycle. It means that used motivation technique (attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction) in learning activity of mathematics foundation gave fact that those technique fulfilled need of undergraduate for reaching optimal achievement. Keywords : understanding concept ability, character, ARCS’s strategy, scaffolding

PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN DESAIN TEMATIK: UPAYA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA DAN KEMAMPUAN PENGELOLAAN KELAS BAGI GURU SD DALAM IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM 2013 Henny Ekana Chrisnawati; Budi Usodo; Getut Pramesthi; Sutopo Sutopo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10050

Abstract: Integrated thematic learning is learning approach that associates some positive aspects in the intra and inter-subject. The integration properties is based on the theme as a binding relationship between matters and there is no separation between the material and subjects, require management setting of learning from the teachers. For that purpose, the aims of this program is to develop a media learning of elementary school students in the implementation of the curriculum 2013 in improving student learning outcomes and assisting elementary school teachers’ in designing teaching and learning activities in the classroom. The software that used is macromedia flash mx, because macromedia flash mx is one of animation software that can be used as a fun media learning and easier software for student to interact with the learning experience.The method used this research is a RnD Thiagarajan model, ie, Define, Design and Develop. The result of the development of the media learning was tested on a limited basis in elementary school student grade IV SD II Al Abidin and SD Warga Surakarta. The results of this research are (1) Media learning have been developed with implementing the 4D Thiagarajan, (2) The results of the content validation, a media learning with Macromedia Flash application are fit can be used with the revision, and the results of the assessment, indicating the category of eligibility amounting as 80 .825% (3) The reliability of the observation of students' response and instructional media development results, showing good agreement category (75.5%), (4) Learning outcomes showed 88% of students have a score above KKM school.Keywords: Thematic design, RnD, Macromedia Flash

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT DENGAN PETA KONSEP PADA POKOK BAHASAN TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI EMOTIONAL SPIRITUAL QUOTIENT DAN KONSEP DIRI SISWA SMA/MA KELAS XI IPA SE-KABUPATEN BANYUMAS Nastiti Rahayu; Budi Usodo; Mardiyana Mardiyana
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i1.9998

Abstract: This research was conducted to find out: (1) which produces better mathematics achievement: students who were given TGT cooperative learning with mind mapping, TGT cooperative learning, or conventional learning; students who have high emotional spiritual intelligence or low one; students who have a positive or negative self-concept. and (2) which is better, the mathematics achievement of students in each category of spiritual emotional intelligence (high or low) and the category of self-concept (positive or negative) on the TGT with mind mapping, TGT cooperative learning, and conventional learning. This study used a quasi-experimental study with a factorial design 3x2x2. The population in this study were all students of Science Second Grade Students of senior high schools in Banyumas Regency in the Academic Year of 2012/2013. The hypothesis test used three-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. Based on the analysis, we concluded as follows. (1) The mathematics achievement of students given TGT learning model with mind mapping was better than students given TGT learning model and the conventional model of learning. However, there was no difference in achievement between students given TGT learning models with conventional learning model; there was no difference in mathematics achievement of students with high emotional spiritual intelligence with students with low emotional spiritual intelligence; the mathematics achievement of students with positive self-concepts better than students with a negative self-concept. (2) In every model of learning, students with high emotional spiritual intelligence always provide a better learning achievement than students with low emotional spiritual intelligence. In the learning model TGT with mind mapping, students with a positive self-concept provided better mathematics achievement than students with a negative self-concept, while in the TGT and conventional learning model, there was no difference in achievement between students with a positive self-concept and students with negative self-concept.Key words: Mathematics Learning Achievement, TGT, Mind Mapping, ESQ, Self Concept

EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL KOOPERATIF MODIFIED JIGSAW PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT PERCAYA DIRI SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA (SMP) NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BOJONEGORO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/2012 Dian Ratna Puspananda; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v2i2.9956

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini diadakan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui : (1) Manakah yang menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, antara model pembelajaran Modified Jigsaw, Jigsaw atau Konvensional, (2) Manakah yang menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, siswa dengan tingkat percaya diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah, (3) Pada model pembelajaran Modified Jigsaw, manakah yang menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, tingkat percaya diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah, (4) Pada model pembelajaran Kooperatif Jigsaw, manakah yang menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, tingkat percaya diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah, (5) Pada model pembelajaran konvensional, manakah yang memberi prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, tingkat percaya diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah, (6) Pada tingkat percaya diri tinggi, manakah yang memberi prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, model pembelajaran konvensional, Jigsaw atau Modified Jigsaw, (7) Pada tingkat percaya diri sedang, manakah yang memberi prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, model pembelajaran konvensional, Jigsaw atau Modified Jigsaw, (8) Pada tingkat percaya diri rendah, manakah yang memberi prestasi belajar matematika lebih baik, model pembelajaran konvensional, Jigsaw atau Modified Jigsaw.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan desain faktorial 3x3. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMPN se-Kabupaten Bojonegoro tahun pelajaran 2011/2012. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara stratified cluster random sampling sehingga terpilih tiga sekolah yaitu SMPN 3 Bojonegoro, SMPN 6 Bojonegoro, dan SMPN 7 Bojonegoro. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah angket sikap percaya diri dan tes prestasi belajar.Dalam penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Siswa-siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw mempunyai prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada siswa-siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional. Sedangkan siswa-siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw mempunyai prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada siswa-siswa dengan pembelajaran konvensional, (2) Prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang mempunyai percaya diri tinggi lebih baik daripada prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang mempunyai percaya diri sedang dan rendah. Tidak ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara siswa yang mempunyai percaya diri sedang dan rendah, (3) Pada pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw, tidak ada perbedaan antara prestasi belajar matematika pada masing-masing tingkatan percaya diri, (4) Pada pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw, tidak ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara siswa-siswa dengan tingkat percaya diri tinggi dan sedang. Begitu pula dengan prestasi belajar matematika siswa-siswa dengan tingkat percaya sedang dan rendah juga tidak mempunyai perbedaan. Tetapi untuk prestasi belajar matematika siswa-siswa dengan percaya diri tinggi lebih baik daripada prestasi belajar matematika siswa-siswa dengan percaya diri rendah, (5) Pada pembelajaran konvensional, tidak ada perbedaan antara prestasi belajar matematika pada masing-masing tingkatan percaya diri, (6) Pada siswa yang memiliki percaya diri tinggi, tidak ada perbedaan antara prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw dan pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw. Akan tetapi prestasi belajar matematika siswa dengan percaya diri tinggi yang diberi pembelajaran jigsaw dan modified jigsaw lebih baik daripada siswa dengan percaya diri tinggi yang diberi pembelajaran konvensional, (7) Pada siswa yang memiliki percaya diri sedang, prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw lebih baik daripada siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional. Prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw lebih baik daripada siswa yang diberi pembelajaran konvensional, (8) Pada siswa yang memiliki percaya diri rendah, tidak ada perbedaan antara prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional. Akan tetapi prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif modified jigsaw lebih baik daripada siswa dengan yang diberi pembelajaran jigsaw dan konvensional.Kata kunci: Modified Jigsaw, Jigsaw, Konvensional, Percaya Diri Siswa, dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW YANG DIMODIFIKASI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN GROBOGAN TAHUN 2010/2011 Moertiningsih E.P.U; Riyadi Riyadi; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v2i1.9946

ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) Apakah pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw, dan keduanya lebih baik daripada pembelajaran konvensional. (2) Apakah siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent mempunyai prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent. (3) Apakah penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional pada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent maupun field independent.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan desain eksperimen 32. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII (delapan) SMP Negeri di Grobogan semester dua tahun pelajaran 2010/2011. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan stratified cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini berasal dari SMP Negeri 1 Purwodadi, SMP Negeri 2 Grobogan, dan SMP Negeri 6 Purwodadi yang berjumlah 307 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar matematika dan tes gaya kognitif siswa. Uji instrumen meliputi validitas isi instrumen tes dilakukan oleh validator dan uji reliabilitas instrumen tes menggunakan rumus KR-20. Uji keseimbangan menggunakan uji anava satu jalan dengan sel tak sama. Uji prasyarat meliputi uji normalitas dengan menggunakan metode uji Lilliefors dan uji homogenitas menggunakan metode Bartlett dengan statistik uji Chi Kuadrat. Uji hipotesis menggunakan uji anava 2 jalan dengan sel tak sama.Hasil analisis data dengan anava dua jalan sel tak sama menunjukkan (1) Terdapat perbedaan rataan antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi, tipe Jigsaw dan konvensional terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fa = 26,749 > F0,05;2;301 = 3,026). (2) Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan gaya kognitif siswa terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fb = 22,652 > F0,05;1;301 = 3,026). (3) Tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan gaya kognitif terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fab = 1,618 < F0,05;2;301 = 3,026).Berdasarkan uji hipotesis dan uji pasca anava diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa: (1) Pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi menghasilkan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw, dan keduanya menghasilkan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. (2) Siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent mempunyai prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent. (3) Pada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent maupun field dependent yang diberikan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi mempunyai prestasi belajar lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan keduanya lebih baik daripada pembelajaran konvensional. Kata kunci: Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi, Jigsaw, Gaya Kognitif, Field Independent, Field Dependent.

Title

Found 38 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 38 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 38 Documents
Search