Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
1.259
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Amwaluna Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial JURISTA : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan
Abdul Jalil Salam
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Amwaluna Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah

 1 
REMUNERATION JUSTICE IN ISLAMIC HIGHER EDUCATION: A STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE Azharsyah Ibrahim; Abdul Jalil Salam; Syahminan Syahminan; Ana Fitria
AMWALUNA (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah) Vol 4, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Univeristas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (315.763 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/amwaluna.v4i2.5630

Abstract

This study generally intends to analyze perception of remuneration justice from the perspectives of stakeholders in Indonesian Public Islamic Universities (PTKIN) that have acquired BLU status. Specifically, this study aims to measure the level of distributive and procedural justice on the implementation of remuneration at selected PTKIN. The respondents of this study are the beneficiaries and remuneration policy makers from 11 PTKIN that have implemented and paid the remuneration at the time of the study. Additional data are obtained from interviews with nine policy makers from the selected PTKIN. The data are analyzed using descriptive percentages method. The results show that in general the implementation of remuneration at the selected PTKIN in included within “fair” category as perceived by the stakeholders. Partially, respondents perceive procedural justice as "tend to be fair", while distributive justice is "fair". This shows that in terms of procedures, the selected PTKIN still have to work harder to fulfill a sense of justice, while from the distribution side it has given more sense of justice as perceived by most respondents. 
Co-Authors Ana Fitria Aulia Rivaldi Azhari Yahya Azharsyah Ibrahim Hasnul Arifin Melayu Ihdi Karim Makinara Junaidi Khairuddin Hasballah MD Zawawi Abu Bakar Mizaj Iskandar Rusjdi Ali Muhammad Syahminan Syahminan Zahlul Pasha