Articles
<![CDATA[PROBLEMATIKA INDEPENDENSI KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH ]]>
<![CDATA[Pasha, Zahlul]]>
<![CDATA[ Justitia et Pax Vol 33, No 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24002/jep.v33i1.1373
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTAfter signing the MoU between the Indonesian government and the Free Aceh Movement, a lot of interesting dynamics going on in Aceh, which is the Qanun KKR Aceh. As an independent agency, the Aceh TRC duty to disclose the truth on the alleged past human rights violations in Aceh. This paper examines the nature of the independence of Aceh TRC is based on theoretical characteristics of an independent institution. Based on the results of the study found that the Aceh TRC has a number of independent properties include: an odd number of members, the independent election commission members, the election and dismissal of members of the commission are closely regulated and has the authority to regulate themselves (self-regulated bodies). However, on the other hand also found two other things that escape is set regarding the nature of the independence of Aceh TRC is concerning institutional decision-making procedures and functions of the commission as well as regarding filling positions that are not members of the commission be gradual (staggered terms) but simultaneously. Keywords: Independency, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh. INTISARIPasca penandatanganan MoU Helsinki antara Pemerintah Indonesia dengan GerakanAceh Merdeka, banyak dinamika menarik yang terjadi di Aceh, salah satunyaadalah pengesahan Qanun KKR Aceh. Sebagai lembaga independen, KKR Aceh bertugas mengungkap kebenaran atas dugaan pelanggaran HAM berat masa lalu di Aceh. Tulisan ini berusaha mengkaji sifat independensi KKR Aceh berdasarkan ciri teroritik suatu lembaga independen. Berdasarkan hasil kajian ditemukan bahwa KKR Aceh memiliki sejumlah sifat independenmeliputi: jumlah anggota yang ganjil, proses pemilihan anggota komisi yang independen, pemilihan dan pemberhentian anggota komisi diatur jelas serta memiliki kewenangan untuk mengatur dirinya sendiri (self regulated bodies). Namun, di sisi lain juga ditemukan dua hal lain yang luput diatur berkenaan sifat independensi KKR Aceh, yaitu menyangkut prosedur pengambilan keputusan kelembagaan dan fungsi komisi serta perihal pengisian jabatan anggota komisi yang tidak dilakukan secara bertahap(staggered terms) melainkan bersamaan. Kata Kunci: Independensi, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh.]]>
<![CDATA[MENILAI KESESUAIAN QANUN KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH DENGAN ASAS-ASAS PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Pasha, Zahlul]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2019): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam (Jurisprud ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[State of Islamic Institute Langsa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v11i2.1042
<![CDATA[This research aim to analyze of parity between the Qanun of Aceh Truth and Reconcialiation Commission and the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Law-making Process.The conclusion of this research is establishment of the Qanun of Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission seems has trouble with the Law-making Process Principles, specifically on clarity of formulation, hierarchical types and material substances. Furthermore, this situation was leading motive prompting people who are harmed to initiate judicial review]]>
<![CDATA[Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Akbar, Khairil]]>;
<![CDATA[Pasha Karim, Zahlul]]>;
<![CDATA[Fadlullah, Nyak]]>;
<![CDATA[Siddiq Armia, Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719
<![CDATA[DOKA is the biggest source of corruption that has driven distric heads in Aceh to prison. This fact raises the question, how has the DOKA monitoring system been carried out and what is the impact on corruption eradication? This study aims to explain the DOKA monitoring system and its impact on corruption eradication. The theory used is the theory of Check and Balances and the theory of Willingness & Oppurtunity. This research is classified into qualitative research with descriptive analysis techniques. The main findings of the study indicate that DOKA is not being taken seriously. This can be seen in the absence of a special supervision system and the normal supervision system for DOKA is not optimal. In addition, there is no special institution that oversees the implementation of DOKA. Such a supervisory system has no impact on corruption eradication. It needs serious improvement and a comprehensive evaluation of the use and distribution of DOKA for the realization of social welfare in Aceh.]]>
<![CDATA[Kontestasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menyelesaikan Polemik Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Aceh ]]>
<![CDATA[Karim, Zahlul Pasha]]>;
<![CDATA[Akbar, Khairil]]>;
<![CDATA[Makinara, Ihdi Karim]]>
<![CDATA[ De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 13, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Syariah ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v13i2.13876
<![CDATA[Abstract: This article tries to trace the steps of the House of Representatives which revoked two articles in Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Governance, namely Article 57 and Article 60 paragraph (1), (2) and (4), which relate to the Aceh election institution through Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Later, the Constitutional Court's action was annulled by the Constitutional Court because it violated the formal procedure for amending the Aceh Governance Law. The research method was carried out normatively with two problem formulations, why did the House of Representative revoke two articles of the Aceh Governance Law related to election management institutions in Aceh without complying with and even violating the procedures regulated by the Aceh Governance Law as a special law? Why did the Constitutional Court annulled the revocation of the two articles and consider them unconstitutional? The result showed that the revocation of the two articles was carried out by the House of Representative for several reasons, namely removing the dualism of the election supervisory agency in Aceh and tidying up the structure of the election management body in Indonesia to comply with the provisions of Article 22E paragraph (5) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In 1945 and strengthening election administration institutions in the face of simultaneous elections in 2019. Meanwhile, the steps were taken by the Constitutional Court to cancel the revocation of the two articles and judge them as unconstitutional because the House of Representative did not conduct consultations and asked the Aceh People's Representative Council for consideration in the revocation process.Keywords: Aceh Election Commission; Election Supervisory Committee; Aceh Governance Law; Election Law.Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan menelusuri langkah DPR yang mencabut dua pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh (UUPA), yakni Pasal 57 dan Pasal 60 ayat (1), (2) dan (4), yang berhubungan dengan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Aceh melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Belakangan, pencabutan itu dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi karena dinilai inkonstitusional. Metode penelitian dilakukan secara normatif dengan dua rumusan masalah, mengapa DPR mencabut dua pasal UUPA terkait lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Aceh tanpa mematuhi tata cara yang telah diatur oleh UUPA sebagai undang-undang khusus? Mengapa Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dan menilainya sebagai tindakan inkonstitusional? Adapun metode penelitian adalah hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, teori, dan historis. Hasilnya diperoleh bahwa pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dilakukan DPR karena beberapa alasan, yakni menghapus dualisme lembaga pengawas pemilu di Aceh dan menertibkan struktur lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia agar sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 22E ayat (5) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sementara langkah Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dan menilainya sebagai tindakan inkonstitusional dikarenakan DPR tidak melakukan konsultasi dan meminta pertimbangan DPRA dalam proses pencabutan.Kata Kunci: Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat; Mahkamah Konstitusi; Lembaga Pemilu Aceh; Undang-undang Pemilu.]]>
<![CDATA[Death Penalty in Indonesia: Revisiting the Debate Between the Retentionist and the Abolitionist ]]>
<![CDATA[Abdul Jalil Salam]]>;
<![CDATA[Zahlul Pasha Karim]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Jember ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v8i1.20138
<![CDATA[Historically, Indonesia's death penalty does not originate from religious doctrine but a series of democratization processes agreed upon in the legislation. Amidst these processes, two competing opinions respond to Indonesia's death penalty: the retentionist and the abolitionist. These different approaches to address the death penalty, whether imposed or abolished, result in competing perspectives and arguments in regulatory and practical issues both in the national and international arena. This study aimed to revisit the death penalty discourse in Indonesia that opposes the human approach by assuming that the death penalty violates human rights. The data were analyzed in three steps, among other things, unitization, comparison, and conclusion. This study showed that the death penalty remains relevant to Indonesia despite the long struggle of its rejection. It concluded that Indonesia's imposition of the death penalty is regarded as worth defending, with specific and selective applications. The specific application means that the death penalty is applicable for corruptors, drug dealers, terrorists, gross human rights violators, and premeditated murders. Selective application means that a convict sentenced to death must be proven in court with a level of accuracy considered and accepted in law. KEYWORDS: Death Penalty, Criminal Law, Right to Life, Indonesian Law.]]>
<![CDATA[TIM PENGAWAL UNDANG-UNDANG PEMERINTAHAN ACEH: DUALISME KLEMBAGAAN DAN KEWENANGAN YANG SUMIR ]]>
<![CDATA[Mutiara Fahmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Zahlul Pasha Karim]]>;
<![CDATA[Nyak Fadhlullah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 18, No 4 (2021): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54629/jli.v18i4.782
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTThis study aims to examine the presence of the UUPA Guard Team which is generally intended to ensure that the articles in the UUPA run properly. This research uses a type of normative legal research, which is carried out by examining library materials that are focused on examining the application of the rules or norms in the UUPA. Data collection techniques were carried out through library research by reading previous studies and readings related to the development of Aceh's special autonomy, followed by observation, in-depth interviews with key informants and several informants who are closely related to this study. The results showed that the formation of the UUPA Guard Team was important because the work apparatus of the Aceh Government and the DPRA did not specifically have the competence and ability to understand the regulations in the UUPA. The formation of the UUPA Guard Team by both the Aceh Government and the DPRA was due to the demands of the article in the UUPA that every change to the UUPA must go through consultation and consideration of the DPRA and the Governor of Aceh, so that the UUPA Guard Team is expected to provide input to the two institutions when there is an attempt to change the provisions. in the UUPA. The presence of the UUPA Guard Team for the specificity of Aceh did not have a direct impact. This is due to the nature of the Guard Team being only limited to the Aceh government support team which was formed temporarily to provide input on the enactment of the UUPA so far. ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan menelaah kehadiran Tim Pengawal UUPA yang secara umum ditujukan untuk memastikan agar pasal-pasal dalam UUPA berjalan sebagaiamana mestinya. Penelitian menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif, yang dilakukan dengan meneliti bahan-bahan pustaka yang difokuskan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah atau norma-norma dalam UUPA. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui library research dengan membaca studi sebelumnya dan bacaan-bacaan yang berkaitan dengan perkembangan otonomi khusus Aceh, dilanjutkan dengan observasi, indepth interview dengan key-informan dan beberapa informan yang berhubungan erat dengan studi ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembentukan Tim Pengawal UUPA penting dilakukan disebabkan perangkat kerja Pemerintah Aceh dan DPRA yang ada tidak secara khusus memiliki kompetensi dan kemampuan memahami aturan dalam UUPA. Pembentukan Tim Pengawal UUPA baik oleh Pemerintah Aceh dan DPRA dikarenakan tuntutan pasal dalam UUPA bahwa setiap terdapat perubahan terhadap UUPA maka harus melalui konsultasi dan pertimbangan DPRA dan Gubernur Aceh, sehingga Tim Pengawal UUPA diharapkan dapat memberikan masukan terhadap kedua lembaga tersebut tatkala ada upaya untuk mengubah ketentuan dalam UUPA. Kehadiran Tim Pengawal UUPA terhadap kekhususan Aceh tidaklah berdampak secara langsung. Hal ini dikarenakan sifat Tim Pengawal hanya sebatas tim pembantu pemerintahan Aceh yang dibentuk secara temporer untuk memberi masukan terhadap keberlakuan UUPA selama ini.]]>
<![CDATA[Sengkarut Pola Hubungan Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus ]]>
<![CDATA[Mutiara Fahmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Zahlul Pasha]]>;
<![CDATA[Khairil Akbar]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Prodi Siyasah (Hukum Tata Negara) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15642/ad.2020.10.1.1-31
<![CDATA[This article seeks to analize the pattern of relations and authority of election agencies in special autonomous regions in Indonesia. The difference in the pattern of relations between election agencies in the special sutonomy region coincided with the implementation of asymmetric decentralization policies in Indonesia. As a result, differences in authority and specificity that is owned by one region with other regions. Whereas the Indonesian constitution based on Article 22E paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that all regulations relating to the electoral institutions in Indonesia apply nationally. The research method used is normative and empirical. This study found similarities and differences in the pattern of relationships and authority of election agencies in the special sutonomy Region. The similarity is that the election agencies in this Special Autonomous Region has lost certain duties and authorities that affect the pattern of their relationship. The difference lies in the lost duties and authority. In DKI Jakarta, the duties and responsibilities of the election organizers in the Regency/City are only in the context of assisting the Election organizing tasks in the Province. The duties and authority of the election organizers in DIY are reduced in the case of the Governor General Election. While in Aceh, the task of supervision is divided between two organizing agencies, namely the Aceh Panwaslih and the Aceh Province Panwaslih. In the future, this pattern of relations and authority will become a source of conflict and dispute. While in Papua Province, the election organize did not hold general elections due to the implementation of the noken system in some of these areas. Artikel ini berupaya menganalisis pola hubungan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di daerah otonomi khusus di Indonesia. Perbedaan pola hubungan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di daerah otsus muncul bersamaan dengan implementasi kebijakan desentralisasi asimetris di Indonesia. Akibatnya, muncul perbedaan kewenangan dan kekhususan yang dimiliki oleh satu daerah dengan daerah lain. Padahal konstitusi Indonesia berdasarkan Pasal 22E ayat (5) UUD NRI 1945 menyebutkan bahwa segala peraturan yang terkait dengan lembaga pemilihan umum di Indonesia berlaku secara nasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif dan empiris. Penelitian ini menemukan adanya kesamaan dan perbedaan pola hubungan dan kewenangan lembaga penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus. Kesamaannya adalah, lembaga penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus ini sama-sama kehilangan tugas dan kewenangan tertentu yang memengaruhi pola hubungan mereka. Perbedaannya terletak pada tugas dan kewenangan yang hilang. Di DKI Jakarta, tugas dan kewengan penyelenggara Pemilu di Kabupaten/Kota hanya dalam rangka membantu tugas penyelenggara Pemilu di Provinsi. Tugas dan kewenangan penyelenggara Pemilu di DIY diciutkan dalam hal Pemilukada Gubernur. Sedang di Aceh, tugas pengawasan dibagi kepada dua lembaga penyelenggara, yakni Panwaslih Aceh dan Panwaslih Provinsi Aceh. Ke depan, pola hubungan dan kewenangan ini menjadi sumber konflik dan sengketa. Sementara di Provinsi Papua, lembaga penyelenggara pemilu tidak melaksanakan pemilihan umum akibat penerapan sistem noken di beberapa daerah tersebut.]]>
<![CDATA[PROBLEMATIKA INDEPENDENSI KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH ]]>
<![CDATA[Zahlul Pasha]]>
<![CDATA[ Justitia et Pax Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24002/jep.v33i1.1373
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTAfter signing the MoU between the Indonesian government and the Free Aceh Movement, a lot of interesting dynamics going on in Aceh, which is the Qanun KKR Aceh. As an independent agency, the Aceh TRC duty to disclose the truth on the alleged past human rights violations in Aceh. This paper examines the nature of the independence of Aceh TRC is based on theoretical characteristics of an independent institution. Based on the results of the study found that the Aceh TRC has a number of independent properties include: an odd number of members, the independent election commission members, the election and dismissal of members of the commission are closely regulated and has the authority to regulate themselves (self-regulated bodies). However, on the other hand also found two other things that escape is set regarding the nature of the independence of Aceh TRC is concerning institutional decision-making procedures and functions of the commission as well as regarding filling positions that are not members of the commission be gradual (staggered terms) but simultaneously. Keywords: Independency, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh. INTISARIPasca penandatanganan MoU Helsinki antara Pemerintah Indonesia dengan GerakanAceh Merdeka, banyak dinamika menarik yang terjadi di Aceh, salah satunyaadalah pengesahan Qanun KKR Aceh. Sebagai lembaga independen, KKR Aceh bertugas mengungkap kebenaran atas dugaan pelanggaran HAM berat masa lalu di Aceh. Tulisan ini berusaha mengkaji sifat independensi KKR Aceh berdasarkan ciri teroritik suatu lembaga independen. Berdasarkan hasil kajian ditemukan bahwa KKR Aceh memiliki sejumlah sifat independenmeliputi: jumlah anggota yang ganjil, proses pemilihan anggota komisi yang independen, pemilihan dan pemberhentian anggota komisi diatur jelas serta memiliki kewenangan untuk mengatur dirinya sendiri (self regulated bodies). Namun, di sisi lain juga ditemukan dua hal lain yang luput diatur berkenaan sifat independensi KKR Aceh, yaitu menyangkut prosedur pengambilan keputusan kelembagaan dan fungsi komisi serta perihal pengisian jabatan anggota komisi yang tidak dilakukan secara bertahap(staggered terms) melainkan bersamaan. Kata Kunci: Independensi, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh.]]>
<![CDATA[MENILAI KESESUAIAN QANUN KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH DENGAN ASAS-ASAS PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Zahlul Pasha]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurisprudensi : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundangan-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2019): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam (Jurisprud ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[State of Islamic Institute Langsa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v11i2.1042
<![CDATA[This research aim to analyze of parity between the Qanun of Aceh Truth and Reconcialiation Commission and the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Law-making Process.The conclusion of this research is establishment of the Qanun of Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission seems has trouble with the Law-making Process Principles, specifically on clarity of formulation, hierarchical types and material substances. Furthermore, this situation was leading motive prompting people who are harmed to initiate judicial review]]>
<![CDATA[Partai Politik Lokal di Daerah Otonomi Khusus: Perbandingan Yuridis Aceh dan Papua ]]>
<![CDATA[Musrafiyan Musrafiyan]]>;
<![CDATA[Mutiara Fahmi]]>;
<![CDATA[Zahlul Pasha Karim]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 6, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty. ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22373/justisia.v6i2.11536
<![CDATA[The existence of local political parties is one of the special powers for Aceh and Papua Provinces. Unlike Aceh, the rules regarding local political parties in Papua are not clearly stated in Law no. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for Papua Province. This paper attempts to analyze the comparison between Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh and Law Number 21 of 2001 on Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua regarding local political parties, and the consequences for Aceh and Papua of differences in local political party arrangements. The method that the author uses is library research with a law approach and a sociological approach. The results of the research show that the Aceh special autonomy law contains 20 articles concerning the formation of local political parties. Furthermore, the existence of local political parties in Aceh can be seen in the participation of some of these parties in the 2009 2014 and 2019 general elections. While Article 28 of the Papua Special Autonomy Law which accommodates political parties does not have permanent legal force to be further interpreted as local political parties. it is also not applicable because it is not equipped with government regulations regarding the formation of local political parties in Papua. Even the Constitutional Court through its decision Number 41/PUU-XVII/2019 rejected the judicial review of Article 28 of the Papua Special Autonomy Law.]]>
