Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter Untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar (SD) Khairun Nisa; Nurhasanah Nurhasanah; Anindita Suliya Hangesti Mandra Kusuma; Deni Sutisna Deni Sutisna; Mega Puspita Sari
Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): May
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jipp.v6i1.158

Abstract

The issue of the character of the nation is still in the sharp spotlight by the community. The characters which at the same time include national culture cover various aspects of life. Even though it has long been echoed in every educational unit, character development seems to be the only writing that is always at the beginning of the lesson plan without any measurement tools.This research aims to explain the form of character assessment instruments developed for elementary school (SD) students. This type of research is development. The product produced from this development research is a character assessment instrument. The development design that will be used is the ADDIE instructional design. The results of internal validation of the instrument show that the questionnaire developed is very valid and can be used without improvement. External validation of the character assessment instrument for low classes, it is known that all statement items in the instrument are valid. The reliability of the low-class character assessment instrument was 0.986 in the first test and 0.984 in the second test. External validation of the character assessment instrument for high class, it is known that all statement items are valid. The reliability of the high-class character assessment instrument on the first test was 0.980 (very high) and on the second test was 0.979 (very high). Recommendations for development results are character assessment instruments that need to be tested in research on normal (offline) learning and still need to be evaluated (after being implemented) based on the input obtained from the response questionnaire or field notes on the observation sheet.
PELATIHAN PENYUSUNAN RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS STEAM PADA MAHASISWA PGSD FKIP UNRAM Nurul Kemala Dewi; Safruddin Safruddin; Awal Nur Kholifatur Rosyidah; Mega Puspita Sari
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 4 (2022): November
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (153.821 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/jppm.v5i4.4307

Abstract

Mahasiswa sebagai guru di masa depan tentunya akan banyak menghadapi tantangan. Kemajuan IPTEKS terutama dibidang teknologi informasi akan memberikan tantangan tersendiri. Bagaimana mendidik para generasi penerus agar mampu bersaing di masa depan tentunya memerlukan strategi tersendiri dalam proses pembelajarannya. Salah satu hal yang perlu diperhatikan implementasinya di sekolah adalah pada penerapan Higher Order Thinking Skill atau yang disingkat HOTS. Mahasiswa sebagai calon guru diharapkan agar mengimplementasikan HOTS pada setiap pembelajarannya, yang tercermin dalam rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran. Salah satu pendekatan pembelajaran yang mengimplementasikan HOTS adalah STEAM, yang merupakan singkatan dari Sciences, Technology, Enginering, Art, Mathematic. Berdasarkan observasi, maka wawasan mahasiswa terkait dengan pendekatan pembelajaran masih perlu perhatian. Hal ini tampak dari pemahaman mahasiswa dalam menyusun rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran yang berbasis HOTS masih kurang, bahkan belum ada yang menerapkan pendekatan STEAM. Mahasiswa sebagai calon guru sebaiknya memahami dengan baik beragam pendekatan pembelajaran yang menerapkan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Hal ini menjadi dasar untuk dilaksanakannya kegiatan penyuluhan dan pendampingan agar mahasiswa memiliki wawasan mengenai pendekatan pembelajaran STEAM serta mampu mengimplementasikannya dalam menyusun rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran. Kegiatan ini dilaksanakan dengan metode pendampingan sebagai berikut : (1) pemaparan materi oleh narasumber dan (2) workshop pelatihan dan pendampingan penyusunan rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran berbasis STEAM. Pada akhir kegiatan, peserta yang berjumlah 15 orang mendapatkan wawasan yang luas mengenai rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran berbasis STEAM serta dapat menyusun rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran tersebut secara mandiri.
KEMAMPUAN NUMERASI AND NEWMAN PROCEDURE: ANALISIS KESALAHAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU SD DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA Iva Nurmawanti; Vivi Rahmatul Hidayati; Hikmah Ramdhani Putri; Mega Puspita Sari
Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistik
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/lb.v4i3.465

Abstract

Numeracy is an essential skill that must be possessed to be successful in the 21st century. Numeration contains complex problems that link mathematics to everyday life. It is necessary to know the numeracy abilities of prospective elementary school teacher students as an initial effort to develop the numeracy abilities of future elementary school teachers. Apart from that, knowing what errors arise in solving numeracy questions is necessary to know what actions to use to develop the numeracy of prospective elementary school teachers. One theory that can be used to see student errors in solving numeracy questions is based on Newman's Errors Analysis (NEA). This research used a qualitative approach involving 154 students, of which 124 experienced errors. The research results showed that there were student errors in Reading Errors (R) at 9.68%, Comprehension Errors (C) at 27.42%, Transformation Errors (T) at 22.58%, Process Skills Errors (P) at 35, 48%, and Encoding Errors (E) of 4.84%. These errors are caused by students not being able to understand the basic concept of fractions, incorrect conceptual understanding regarding the concept of fractions, and students not understanding how to write fraction symbols and what two fractions have in common