Articles
<![CDATA[DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA (Allegations of Dumping Practice by Indonesia on Paper Products) ]]>
<![CDATA[Raditya Permana]]>;
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>
<![CDATA[ UNTAG Law Review Vol 1, No 1 (2017): UNTAG Law Review (ULREV) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (117.407 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36356/ulrev.v1i1.523
<![CDATA[This research entitled Dispute Settlement Between Indonesia and South Korea (Allegation of Dumping Practice by Indonesia on Paper Product) aims to analyze the dispute settlement between Indonesia and South Korea on the allegations of dumping practice. The research method is Juridical Normative. Indonesia is one of the WTO members which have ratified the Agreement Establishing the WTO by Law Number 7 in 1994. It means that Indonesia is a subject to the provisions of the WTO including the provisions on anti-dumping disputes. On 30 September 2002, Indonesia and South Korea were involved in the import duty case of anti-dumping paper products. It was occurred when a South Korean paper industry proposed anti-dumping petitions against Indonesian paper products to the Korean Trade Commission (KTC). The Indonesian paper products are charged with dumping including 16 products which belong to the group of uncoated paper and paper board used for writing, printing, or other graphic purpose and carbon paper, self-copy paper and other copying.]]>
<![CDATA[LEGAL PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF KAMPUNG NAGA AS TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>
<![CDATA[ UNTAG Law Review Vol 5, No 1 (2021): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (492.187 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36356/ulrev.v5i1.2209
<![CDATA[Legal protection of traditional architectural design as a part of Indonesian traditional knowledge, without being realized, has become a great and complicated issuebecause recently it is being exploited by irresponsible parties. The Indonesian philosophy Bhinneka Tunggal Ika describes Indonesia which consists of many ethnic groups around every corner of archipelago in which they create their own culture area with different condition. Every ethnic has traditional architecture as the cultural manifestation which rests on the custom and belief. Traditional architectural design as a piece of traditional knowledge in Indonesia is considered as one of cultural conservation which is material that needs to be protected. One of the matters that attracts attention now is architectural design of indigenous village in Indonesia called Kampung Naga. Kampung Naga provides sample or design of energy-efficient building in which its design is later developed by the private parties in Indonesia. Traditional intellectual property specifically the local wisdom has proved to offer many contributions for the development of environmental insight by using the teachings from ancestors which have been inherited through generations for centuries. Therefore, this research focuses on legal protection of traditional architectural design as a cultural conservation of Kampung Naga society in Indonesia which needs to be protected from exploitation or piracy both from private companies in Indonesia and from another country.]]>
<![CDATA[Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal Antara Indonesia dan China ]]>
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 22, No 2 (2022): Juli ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Batanghari Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v22i2.2025
<![CDATA[This research entitled A Comparative Study on Legal Protection of Communal Intellectual Property Rights between Indonesia and China aims to analyze the application of legal protection toward communal intellectual property in Indonesia and China. This research is examined using a normative juridical research method. This method uses the legal positivism approach. This study discusses the legal protection system toward communal intellectual property in Indonesia and China, in which legal protection is ratified by intellectual property regulations originating from international treaties. The results show that Indonesia and China both apply the concept of defensive and positive protection by forming laws specifically related to traditional knowledge (sui generis law). However, this concept cannot be applied in Indonesia and China through special laws and regulations regarding traditional knowledge included in the intellectual property system.]]>
<![CDATA[Sosialisasi dan Pelatihan Pendaftaran Hak Cipta dengan Sistem POP HC di Kota Tasikmalaya ]]>
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>;
<![CDATA[Yuris Tri Naili]]>;
<![CDATA[Purwono Purwono]]>;
<![CDATA[Iin Dyah Indrawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat - PIMAS Vol 1 No 3 (2022): Agustus ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa Purwokerto ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (676.105 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35960/pimas.v1i3.830
<![CDATA[Someone's copyrighted work is the absolute right of the creator who is named with copyright. Basically, a copyrighted work can be used alone or transferred to others through a legal transition. The transition can be economically beneficial because the copyright holder must pay royalties to the owner. Basically, not everyone is aware of the existence of a transfer of rights that can be one of the protection of one's work can be done by means of copyright registration as evidenced by a certificate of copyright registration issued by the DGIP. The method used is by socialization and training directly to the representatives of artists in the city of Tasikmalaya. Socialization and training activities are aimed at providing an understanding of copyright registration and providing training for owners of copyrighted works to be able to register their own copyrighted works using the POP HC application that has been made by the DGIP to facilitate the recording of copyright on a copyrighted work]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN ASET DIGITAL PADA ERA METAVERSE DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>;
<![CDATA[Yuris Tri Naili]]>;
<![CDATA[Hesti Ayu Wahyuni]]>;
<![CDATA[Purwono Purwono]]>
<![CDATA[ Literasi Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2022): LITERASI HUKUM ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tidar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (186.294 KB)
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini mengkaji mengenai permasalahan tindak kejahatan terhadap aset digital pada era metaverse dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap aset digitalnya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap aset digital pada era metaverse. Artikel ini diteliti dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif. Dimana pada pembahasannya penelitian ini memprioritaskan kepada pengkajian penerapan norma hukum positif atau kaidah hukum yang diterapkan di Indonesia. Perlindungan hukum terhadap aset digital pada era metaverse berkaitan dengan ancaman keamanan dan privasi terhadap identitas, data, privasi, jaringan, ekonomi, tata kelola, dan efek fisik/sosial. Tindak kejahatan terhadap aset digital pada metaverse dilakukan dengan cara pencurian data oleh peretas, peniruan identitas pengguna metaverse, perusakan pada data pengguna dan penyebaran data yang bersifat pribadi. Selain itu kejahatan pada metaverse dilakukan terhadap Non-Fungible Token yang berkaitan erat dengan kekayaan intelektual pada hak cipta, merek dan desain industri. Perlindungan hukum terhadap aset digital pada metaverse dapat diproses di dunia nyata dengan mengimplementasikan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada pada hukum positif di Indonesia yaitu dengan menerapkan sanksi pidana terhadap tindakan pelanggaran pada metaverse dengan mengimplementasikan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi sedangkan untuk pelanggaran atau pencurian pada NFT dapat menerapkan aturan hukum pada Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.]]>
<![CDATA[Optimalisasi Akses Literasi Produk Hukum Secara Digital di Era Ketebukaan Informasi Publik ]]>
<![CDATA[Alan Bayu Aji]]>;
<![CDATA[Marlia Hafny Afrilies]]>;
<![CDATA[Hesti Ayu Wahyuni]]>;
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>;
<![CDATA[Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat - PIMAS Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Februari ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa Purwokerto ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35960/pimas.v2i1.976
<![CDATA[The current era of Public Information Openness has had an impact on all sectors of people's lives, one of which is in the field of law. Disclosure of public information is a right of the community and an obligation for the state, in this case the provision of public information in the field of law in the form of legal products. The community is still very low in understanding regarding access to legal product literacy. This can be seen from the fact that there are still many misunderstandings about a draft legal product made by the Government and the DPR. To overcome these problems, through collaboration with the Legal Research and Writing Community, an activity has been carried out on the socialization of legal information documentation literacy. The activity was carried out directly and attended by students with legal backgrounds from several universities in Purwokerto. In carrying out these activities it aims to provide an understanding of how to optimally access legal product literacy digitally. This is considered important because apart from being a source of student knowledge, it can also be a means of effective outreach to the community, so as to minimize misunderstanding of a legal product made by the state.]]>
<![CDATA[TRANSFERRING COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP OF NFT ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF POSITIVE LAW IN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>
<![CDATA[ Perspektif Vol. 28 No. 1 (2023): Edisi Januari ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v28i1.845
<![CDATA[The development of NFT use does not function for the public’s need of objects related to copyright. In general, when someone creating NFT using another person’s work needs approval from the copyright owner. This type of normative juridical research is used as an assessment of the application of positive legal norms or legal rules applied in Indonesia. The results of research on Transferring Copyright Ownership Of NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) On The Perspective Of Positive Law In Indonesia can be regulated by using the provisions of Article 18 UUHC related to selling-buying outright of copyrighted works which in practice must meet the requirements stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code concerning the conditions for the validity of the agreement which are the existence of an agreement, parties’ requirement, particular objects, and lawful cause. The transaction of copyrighted works on NFT is not merely a sale and purchase for ordinary works of art, but also includes the rights to a copyrighted work protected by positive law in Indonesia. NFTs are protected under copyright laws and therefore have 2 (two) rights attached: economic and moral. In this regard, changing or distributing as well as modifying actions is included in violating moral rights. Even though the ownership has been transferred, the copyright holder must still be entitled to the economic and moral rights of the creator attached to the NFT.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Sertifikasi Halal pada Produk Import di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Import Daging Ayam dari Brazil) ]]>
<![CDATA[Zalfa Aliya Nadzifah]]>;
<![CDATA[Vina Okta Vidiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Tri Yulianti]]>;
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>
<![CDATA[ Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2022: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SNPPKM 2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Harapan Bangsa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (120.762 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35960/snppkm.v2i1.1019
<![CDATA[Indonesia sebagai salah satu Negara yang melakukan transaski perdangan internasional dengan Negara lain sehingga banyak produk impor yang masuk ke Indonesia. Banyaknya penduduk Indonesia yang memeluk agama islam hal tersebut berdampak pada produk makan dan minum yang beredar di Indonesia harus memiliki sertifikasi halal termasuk produk impor, hal tersebut sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Jaminan Produk Halal. Kewajiban produk yang beredar di Indonesia harus memiliki sertifikasi halal menimbulkan permasalahan salah satunya terjadi sengketa antara Indonesia dengan Brazil mengenai daging ayam impor dari Brazil sehingga Berazil menggugat Indonesia WTO, namun dalam penyelesaiannya sengketa tersebut terbukti bahwa Indonesia tidak melanggaran aturan perdagangan Internasional dan kebijakan yang di keluarkan oleh Indonesia tidak melanggar atuaran hukum yang berlaku. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana Penerapan Sertifikasi Halal Pada Produk Import di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif yang bersumber pada buku, jurnal ilmiah dan undang-undang.]]>
<![CDATA[Legalitas Penerapan Praktik Euthanasia Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Positif di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Ummu Habibah Azalia]]>;
<![CDATA[Septiani Aditiya Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Yuris Tri Naili]]>;
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>;
<![CDATA[Alan Bayu Aji]]>
<![CDATA[ Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2022: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SNPPKM 2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Harapan Bangsa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (132.429 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35960/snppkm.v2i1.1151
<![CDATA[Euthanasia adalah praktik pencabutan kehidupan manusia atau hewan melalui cara yang dianggap tidak menimbulkan rasa sakit atau menimbulkan rasa sakit yang minimal, biasanya dilakukan dengan cara memberikan suntikan yang mematikan dengan adanya kasus permohonan euthanasia yang diajukan oleh keluarga karena berbagai macam masalah antara lain kendala ekonomi dalam membiayai biaya rumah sakit, dan juga ketidak sanggupan karena melihat anggota keluarga tak sadarkan diri dalam jangka waktu yang lama. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasikan karakteristik suatu peristiwa atau kejadian yang menjadi fenomena saat ini. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yaitu menurut hukum positif di Indonesia, Euthanasia dikatakan sebagai tindakan malpraktek karena malpraktek adalah praktek yang tidak sesuai dengan standar profesi yang telah ada dan menyalahi undang-undang serta kode etik yang ada. Tindakan euthanasia ini dikategorikan sebagai tindakan malpraktek pidana (criminal malpractice) karena dilakukan dengan kesengajaan atau kelalaian]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Pasien dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Yuris Tri Naili]]>;
<![CDATA[Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko]]>;
<![CDATA[Maya Ruhtiani]]>;
<![CDATA[Hesti Ayu Wahyuni]]>
<![CDATA[ Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2022: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (SNPPKM 2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Harapan Bangsa ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (163.641 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35960/snppkm.v2i1.1158
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini membahas mengenai bagaimana pengaturan mengenai pasien sebagai konsumen dalam pelayanan kesehatan yang ditinjau berdasarkan hukum perlindungan konsumen yang berlaku di indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu yuridis sosiologis atau yang sering disebut dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris dan dengan menggunakan konsep yang ke 4, dengan mengkaji Law as it in society, yaitu Hukum sebagai pola-pola perilaku sosial yang terlembagakan. Perlindungan hukum pasien dalam pelayanan kesehatan berdasarkan persfektif hukum perlindungan konsumen di Indonesia secara keseluruhan harus mengikuti peraturan perundang-undang. Pelayanan kesehatan dianggap sudah baik apabila memenuhi hak-hak pasien yaitu terpenuhinya informasi yang dibutuhkan pasien, pelaksanaan jaminan keamanan, kenyamanan dan keselamatan, pasien diperlakukan sama pada saat diberikan pelayanan kesehatan oleh dokter/tenaga kesehatan, adanya persetujuan pasien dalam pemberian pelayanan kesehatan disedikannya kotak saran, pengaduan langsung kepada dokter/perawat dan adanya bidang pelayanan untuk pengaduan pasien.]]>
